MovieChat Forums > Meg Ryan Discussion > why do people STILL hold the Quaid/Crowe...

why do people STILL hold the Quaid/Crowe thing against her?


Happened over a decade ago.

reply

This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

Because those people don't realize Quaid cheated on her for many years in the late nineties & that she and Quaid were already seperated because of that before she and Crowe became involved.

reply

"why do people STILL hold the Quaid/Crowe thing against her?"

Because those people have no life.Plain and simple.


If you're going to be a pest Taffy,I'll just have to ignore you!Marsha Dale

reply

"Separated" does not mean "divorced," which means that she was just as guilty of adultery as Dennis.

reply

Oh please...some divorces, if difficult, can takes years. And, all that time a person is supposed to act like they are still married and be devoted to a failed marriage?

reply

Yeah, they are. It’s a rule that encourages actually thinking things through before entering into holy matrimony.

reply

False. Dennis' adultery is the reason they split. While divorce can take years, the split already occurred because of him. Thus she had the right to move on and not waste any more years on that axxhole.

reply

Obviously it was because of him.

reply

I have to speak up in Meg's defense here. Quaid, while a gifted performer, had according to the rumor mill been cheating for years and years.

Plus, according to celeb reporter friends of mine, the rumor mill said he was widely assumed to be on substances for many of those years, possibly with real addiction problems. The interview shorthands are fascinating -- go back and look at how many he's shaky or fidgeting in.

After years of demoralization and secrecy, I definitely don't blame Meg for Crowe, and they seemed to be a good couple while they lasted.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I keep thinking I'm a grownup, but I'm not.

reply

The public just got tired of her. Her day was done. The market had moved on. She reached her sell-buy date. And, not for nothing, she had atrocious taste in men. Her fade wasn’t a moral thing. It was a market forces thing.

reply