MovieChat Forums > Politics > How long has the media been evil?

How long has the media been evil?


How long have they been doing it for?

reply

Since the jews took over Disney

reply

And when, and how was this?

reply

1991: Beauty and the Beast was a good point of time for the start of the decent into clear jewish propaganda

reply

What are the hallmarks, exactly, of "jewish propaganda"?

reply

promoting the destruction of family and whiteness in our nations while keeping these powerful institutions safe in their own criminal ethnostate

reply

How does Beauty and the Beast do that?

And how do you know this trend, as you see it, derives from Jews?

And what are some examples of shows/films that do this?

reply

Hot girl falling in love with a beast, kinda like how their media pushes white girls to date negroids

reply

🙄

reply

That's the message you took from it? And are you saying that any single show that depicts interracial relationships is wrong?

And how do you know this trend, as you see it, derives from Jews?

And what are some (other) examples of shows/films that do this?

reply

Why don't we see interracial marriage with jewish girls dating blacks why is it only blue eyed blondies in the jew media having to play this role?!?

reply

How do you know we don't see that in any shows or films?

And you didn't answer my question:

And how do you know this trend, as you see it, derives from Jews?

And what are some (other) examples of shows/films that do this?

> jew media having to play this role?!?

How do you know all films/shows that do this come from "jew media"?

reply

[deleted]

It's not that the media is evil exactly - it is that we have no way to change the media from this pay-for-play model. In other words, until the Internet, everything we saw on TV or in print was paid for by someone who for some reason wanted to "program" people with their ideas of reality.

Then when we started to get a free press, public media, immediately the monied interests have tried to find a way to shut it down. They can shout louder. They can censor. They can create noise and distraction. They can attack individual voices and ideas with all the tools that their power and wealth can muster against us.

Meanwhile, we have only our culture, reason, and education to rely on, and that is under attack as well. Look at our schools and universities - we have violent idiots protesting who over and over when interviewed and given a chance to speak tell us with blank stares they have no idea what an Intifada is, or what from the River to The Sea means, or what the hell has been going on in the world since the dawn of man. In other words, mostly idiots who have been programmed to think they have something important to say.

reply

Are you talking about the news? Or Hollywood? Or both?

If you're talking about the news, frankly, they've been evil and had their own agenda since newspapers were first invented. It was a news campaign that helped take down a Queen in France, and it was a lying news campaign that started a war in the the Caribbean, just so more newspapers could be sold, never mind that lives were lost. It's the news that pushes narratives on people, even if they're not true, and it's the news that bows to whomever gives them the most money to report on whatever their favorite overlords want.

The film industry was rotten from the start, it's just that nobody was aware for at least a decade or two before scandals started being printed in the news. I mean, you basically took all the crap that was going on behind the scenes in the theater setting on the East Coast and in Europe, transferred it over to southern California, and got moving cameras involved. All that stuff about the Casting Couch, the competition, the backdoor deals, the power trips, the destruction of dreams, the drug dealing; all that was already going on in the theater setting, it's just, people didn't care back before Hollywood came about because actors were not given the time of day by the public when off the stage, and most of the time, the papers could care less about what happened to some actor behind the curtain. Celebrity worship only started in the 1920s with moving pictures.

And don't get me started on internet news sites. They just transferred all the shit going on with newspapers and tv to the virtual realm.

reply

Of course we don't teach history in schools anymore, but it used to be understood that actors and the theater represented some of the lowest levels of society in the past. This celebrity worship really took off when the Tribe became undisputed lords and masters of the nascent movie business.

Newspapers in the United States have been violently partisan from the very inception of the Republic. But it was an accepted part of politics for a long time. It's a fairly recent development, again curiously coincidental with increasing media control by our "fellow white people", that news reporting has tried to claim for itself the role of fighting for the little guy and speaking truth to power.

There's great truth to the line, "the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."

reply

Yay! You get it too! :D

reply

Yep, newspapers were used for propaganda long before the same crap was put on TV. Ya know all that nonsense about Napoleon being short and angry? Pure propaganda. The Civil War fought to free slaves? Pure propaganda. People still believe both bullshit stories.

reply

Oh yeah, it turns out that whole "Napoleon being short" myth was started by the British newspapers, because, of course, He went to war with England at one point during his career, so of course they're gonna post propaganda that dumps on him (not that some of it was wrong, he really was a rude little asshole that wanted to conquer the world). Napoleon was actually of average height, at least for men in France and Europe in general for his time period. The trouble is, a lot of America's historical information comes from England, so a lot of English myths from their own newspapers and propaganda persists into the present.

That whole thing about Marie Antoinette being a selfish bitch and saying, "Let them eat cake?" Pure newspaper trash. She never said that. She actually wasn't a bad person, but the problem is, she is a victim of circumstance. If she had been a smarter, more proactive Queen, and not been trapped in the system, she might have had the ability to help the French peasants more. But as it was, she and her husbands were basically pawns the fall guys for higher pay grade people, both on the monarchy side, and the revolution side.

reply

Since it's inception.

reply

Since AD200...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexamenos_graffito

The Alexamenos graffito (also known as the graffito blasfemo, or blasphemous graffito)[1]: 393  is a piece of Roman graffito scratched in plaster on the wall of a room near the Palatine Hill in Rome, Italy, which has now been removed and is in the Palatine Museum.[2] It may be meant to depict Jesus; if so, it competes with an engraved gem held in the British Museum as the earliest known pictorial representation of the Crucifixion of Jesus.[3][4] It is hard to date, but has been estimated to have been made around the year 200 AD.[5] The image seems to show a young man worshipping a crucified, donkey-headed figure. The Greek inscription approximately translates to "Alexamenos worships [his] god,"[6] indicating that the graffito was apparently meant to mock a Christian named Alexamenos.[7]

Here's the link to The British Museum "Magical Gem"

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1986-0501-1

Clearly anti-Christian as it depicts the crucifixion completely at odds with what we know today... estimated creation 2nd-3rd century...

reply

I think the turn began to happen after 9/11 and MSNBC's hatred of George W. Bush which led into the ugly God like Worship of Obama.

reply

As many have said, since its inception. But to get more "current," in 1932 Walter Duranty of the New York Times won a Pulitzer for his coverage (cover up, more accurately) about the conditions in the Ukraine during the Holodomor (something most people never heard about in school) where an estimated 10 million Ukrainians starved to death due to the policies of Stalin's that basically stole every morsel of wheat from the "bread basket of Europe," that led to mothers cooking their babies that had died before them.

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/08/1097097620/new-york-times-pulitzer-ukraine-walter-duranty

And to tie this in to movies, check out Mr. Jones (2019) a movie made about Welsh journalist Gareth Jones, who sought to expose Duranty's lies. Jones died under mysterious circumstances in 1935.

For those who hold the NYT as the "pinnacle of journalism," do a little digging. They have had a hand in starting several other major wars due to their false reporting.

reply

And you wonder why less and less people are taking the mainstream news at their word anymore?

reply

Nope. About ten years ago, many of my friends who never talked about the news all of a sudden couldn't stop going on and on about it. I never paid much attention to it, but started to suspect something was not passing the smell test.

Instead of buying in to second hand info, and edited clips, I went to the sources and listened to whole speeches, or at least longer, unedited clips, and independent media, and discovered that the media was lying by omission mostly, and putting their own spin on stories and didn't provide whole unbiased facts, but continuously spun various narratives that were designed to produce outrage, instead of providing stories that people could form their own opinions on. Propaganda works best when small pieces of facts were mixed in with "editorial content" nudging people to certain conclusions that suited the media's narrative.

I'm sure variations of this technique have been around much longer, but it was honed to modern effectiveness by the Frankfurt School as "Critical Theory," shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution, by adherents including Edward Bernays, Sigmund Freud's nephew. Check out Adam Curtis's documentary mini-series The Century of the Self [2002] for a deeper dive, including the dawn of modern advertising.

reply

You can find demonstrations of people buying into the media lies right here on this website. All you gotta do is look at all the mainstream media stories people post about Israel, Gaza, and President Trump. They've been trained by both the tv and social media to only take what is said in those mediums as gospel truth and not look into how other, less well-known news outlets look at the same story. I could name at least three different Trump myths they still believe in, despite them being debunked. Not to mention that incident in Missouri with "hands up, don't shoot!"

And our media aren't the only ones guilty of this. The media over in Europe and parts of Asia as well as Latin America pull that kind of crap too, doing lies of omission and pushing narratives that are designed to outrage people instead of telling the whole truth.

I've heard of the Frankfurt School. It's mentioned frequently in writings about how evil people covertly pushing socialism and communism often got their first training there in times past.

reply

I think we're on the same page.

reply

That's great to hear :)

reply

Since Edward R. Murrow

reply