MovieChat Forums > WhyNowTho > Replies
WhyNowTho's Replies
Ha ha. And a Trump supporter complaining about somebody ELSE hurling insults... These people either have no sense of shame or are completely oblivious -- pro'ly both.
LOL. MAGA turds have nothing. I mean, what could you possibly say to logically defend the glaring double standard?
I'm asking will you believe law enforcement findings.
Either you believe them for BOTH Smullet and Trump, or NEITHER.
I assume you'll defend an atheist baker who'll serve Christians normal cake but won't bake them a WEDDING cake if the wedding is officiated by a church official or in a church. Because that violates the atheist's beliefs that religion is a scourge. Oh, do only Christian's get to refuse on "moral" grounds. Special rights.
Wrong. If you're in the business of baking wedding cakes, then you bake the goddamn cake. Whether the customers are gay, straight, MAGA, non-MAGA.
Let's see if your argument holds up when we swap sexuality with race: "no one has a problem making a BLACK birthday cake or graduation cake for a BLACK person. Its the wedding cake thats the issue and certain SJWs are trying to treat it like BLACKS are being thrown to the back or off the bus."
So you'd be okay if a baker refused to bake a wedding cake for black people because according to the baker's interpretation of the Bible, black people are animals and therefore can't get married?
Awwww, did I hurt your widdle feelings, snowflake? Need a safe space?
No dummy, I said they have a scandal bias and Trump has eight un-ignorable scandals a day.
Dummy, you didn't answer the question as to why the media is focusing way more on the hoax revelation than the damaging voter fraud by an actual GOP congressman.
Dummy's a dummy, that's why.
If no on watches, why threaten retribution? You hilarious dummy.
If Trump knows one thing, it's TV ratings, of which SNL has the highest in decades.
Reality derangement syndrome is what you have. To claim NO ONE watches when the president is directly referencing what he WATCHED. Lololololol.
You're comparing this piddling case of of some random amateur to an ACTUAL CONGRESSMAN CHEATING TO WIN AND THUS FORCING THE North Carolina Board of Elections [b]TO VOTE UNANIMOUSLY[/b] TO NOT CERTIFY THE ELECTION AND ORDER A NEW ONE -- you're comparing these two things?
How fucking desperate are you? Or are you just pathetic? And how much scrounging on the internet did you do to find this minuscule case? lol
In other words, when it suits my politics, it's a conspiracy -- when it doesn't suit my politics, it's not a conspiracy.
Hoax hate crimes, as bad as they are, are nowhere near damaging as real hate crimes...
See Charlottesville driver...
See Maga Bomber...
See Synagogue shooter (I know, I know, he hated Trump... for not being racist enough!)
Ultimately, you can undo the damage of a hoax hate crime by prosecuting the individual and exposing the hoax. You can't bring Heather Heyer back to life by prosecuting the piece of shit that mowed her down in a car.
If he didn't involve the police, then yeah technically he'd be covered by the 1st amendment.
That's what happens, dummy. When your film doesn't perform. Theaters ditch your product. Observe, the same thing happened to a non-political film which opened with similar numbers to Gossnell just a few weeks prior:
[url]https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=assassinationnation.htm[/url]
The Mueller report hasn't been delivered yet. I'm asking -- when law enforcement officials make their case in the future, like they have just done with Smollet, will you believe them?
I'm thinking you won't.
From Newsweek:
[url]https://www.newsweek.com/remember-irs-scandal-it-was-fake-news-all-along-681674[/url]
From NPR:
[url]https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/555975207/as-irs-targeted-tea-party-groups-it-went-after-progressives-too[/url]