Plot Hole


So the Capital building has just been destroyed by bombs. So they put all the important people left in the Whitehouse? Don't you think maybe that might be the next target? Don't you think it more likely that they'd lock down and evacuate DC and move the New President and family away from DC?

reply

Please learn what a plot hole is. This isn't one.

__________________________________________
"In your opinion?"
"Um, yes your honor, in my opinion."

reply

I was thinking some kind of bunker at the White House or Camp David or that place in Nebraska.

reply

Granted it wasn't a plot hole, but it was in first thing that came into my head that late at night. What I also know is that LBJ recited the oath of the president on Air Force 1. So while the optics of the oath being taken in the WH is useful it's not needed. The difference here Is that after 9/11 our government was intact. No one on the line of succession was killed and I don't believe any elected official or cabinet member was killed.
So what we have here is keeping safe the last person who could be president without a constitutional crisis and he's being paraded around in a potential bomb zone. That is bad writing to me.

reply

Granted it wasn't a plot hole, but it was in first thing that came into my head that late at night. What I also know is that LBJ recited the oath of the president on Air Force 1.


That was in 1963, at the very beginning of media-run presidencies and in the middle of the Cold War. You couldn't get away with that now. Just think of the message it would send--"Hi, I'm the new President of the United States and I'm taking office on a military plane, surrounded by soldiers." Praetorian Guard, much?

So what we have here is keeping safe the last person who could be president without a constitutional crisis and he's being paraded around in a potential bomb zone. That is bad writing to me.


This is not a convincing argument because it continues to ignore that absolutely critical factor of ensuring a quick and legal transfer of office in surroundings the public would recognize and would find reassuring. In that sense, the new President *has* to be in the White House to reassure the public that everything is fine and we can more or less go on as usual, even when that's not true.

There's also the cold, hard fact that if it is an inside job, nowhere is safe for the new President, anyway, and he is probably a lot safer the more he lives in the public eye. It's easier to dispose of him quietly if he hides out in some bunker somewhere.

The Historical Meow http://thesnowleopard.net

reply

That was in 1963, at the very beginning of media-run presidencies and in the middle of the Cold War. You couldn't get away with that now. Just think of the message it would send--"Hi, I'm the new President of the United States and I'm taking office on a military plane, surrounded by soldiers." Praetorian Guard, much?

They would swear in a new president immediately, regardless of where he (or she) is. They never did nor ever will put someone on a plane for the purpose of searing them in but at the same time if they are in the air then they would do it in the air. They would not say, "Oh, we could not swear him (or her) into office because he (or she) was in the air.", that would not be acceptable.

reply

That crossed my mind too after Maggie Q's character mentioned "this could just be the beginning".

While the White House is very secure, so was the Capitol and that didn't stop the bad guys from blowing it up.

reply

In reality, the Designated Survivor wouldn't have even been in DC, in the event of a massive nuclear strike. I mean, the guy is the potential President and he is looking out his window at the Capitol building, which is on fire!

They likely would have moved him to a secure location (one of the command and control bunkers in Virginia or Maryland), Camp David or to Offut AFB in Nebraska, or some other location.

They would NOT have taken him back to the White House until the attack was sorted out and they could be sure that DC was safe.

Major plot hole.

reply

It was a ploy designed to show strength a hey look you blew up the capital with the president but hey look WE GOT ANOTHER PRESIDENT You did nothing the government will go on business as usual . I believe its also stated that its important for them to do a show of strength and by having the president in the white house that shows strength so really no plot hole.

FIVE TO ONE BABY ONE IN FIVE NO ONE HERE GETS OUT ALIVE - JIM MORRISON

reply

And a decapitations trike was attempted the night Lincoln was shot and killed. At the same time, the Vice President and Secretary of State were attacked but survived. If the Vice President would also have been killed that night, there would have been no constitutional successor to the presidency, as the list was only one deep until the ratification of the 25th amendment in 1965.

reply

Abraham Lincoln was shot about a century and a half ago. That is not much of an example since technology has improved drastically since then.

reply

You are right, they would not gather everyone together and especially not such a likely place as the Whitehouse.

reply

[deleted]