REPULSIVE!
I still can't believe that Batman had sex with a goddamn teenager. They demoralized the character on BvS, now this *beep* Where is the moral ground of this character?
shareI still can't believe that Batman had sex with a goddamn teenager. They demoralized the character on BvS, now this *beep* Where is the moral ground of this character?
shareBatgirl is not a teenager in this. She's got to be at least in her mid-20s (and in the graphic novel Babs appears to be noticeably older). It was a mistake, though, for both of them, but Barbara was the one who initiated the encounter.
"If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker
It is fundamentally wrong, Batgirl was created to be the love interest of Robin, lol It was pointless enough back them, now they use her as a sex tool again? And from all possible characters, they choose Batman? She was named Batgirl for a reason, her character represents the young justice, the student, not a love interest. That is lazy writing, they don't figure out a way to bond the male character with the female. Sex was the shortcut... And considering the scenario and the back story, it was a disgusting shortcut.
shareHey, I'm fine with you objecting to Batman and Batgirl's intercourse. It was meant to be a mistake for both of them. But your first post gave the wrong reasons (at least in part). Age wasn't the issue; it's just too bad that the film didn't make that more clear.
"If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker
Age is not the issue, the moral is the issue. She was named "girl" not only because of her age, she is an student, a character that represents the younger generation. She having sex with batman is the same of a student having sex with his teacher. In this case, the teacher is basically represented as an assexual character who resisted to have sex even with woman he loves (Selina, Thalia, etc). He even resist Poison Ivy, lol All this background and character development... For him to succumbs for Babs? Out of nohwere? That doesn't make any *beep* sense, Batman has a moral code. That's the fun of the character, he is a sociopath driven by a strict moral code. Teenager or not, she still is his student and protege, she is the daughter of one of the few man he respects. This scenario is all messed up, a know character by his moral ground is now murdering people on movies and banging students on animations? C'mon now...
shareGo back and read my last post. I am not disagreeing with you.
"If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker
You said it all, acesso-33! BatGIRL (not BatWOMAN) represents Batman's legacy, the next generation of crimefighters driven by the will of bringing justice to a failed society. She is his apprentice, his student, she is supposed to be his adopted son's girlfriend for christ's sake! Batman is an older and wiser figure that is supposed to guide and protect that girl not *beep* her brains out. I totally got your back on this one. Not only it was unconfortable and of really bad taste it was *beep*ing flawed and a flawed Batman is no Batman. That's the whole point of this particular hero. Bruce Wayne is human. He is limited, vulnerable, MORTAL. The Batman is not. He's a symbol. Something you can't corrupt, break or forget. Villains can tear his body apart, poison and lacerate not only him but the ones he swore to protect but what keeps people's hope from fading is the well known fact that whatever the world manages to throw against him, the Batman will NEVER STOP. He may fall but he will always rise again and continue to fight for them, for what he believes in, for you can twist, bend and scar his phisical form but no one will ever tamper it's moral. His ethical code is what sustains his figure, if it's integrity is compromised the Batman dies. That's the whole point of the original Killing Joke. Those two antagonists were looking into each other (even if subconsciously) for a way to end their characters before being consumed by them. The moment the Joker convinces Batman of this reality with that last gag his life is put to an end and the Batman perishes with him for the Batman doesn't kill.
Bruce Wayne can do Thalia, Selina and even young girls in their 20's (that aren't your protégés, of course) for what i care. But when he puts on that mask, he has to be a bloody monument.
That's the point man, that's the freaking point! We know that Batman has huge doses of protagonism, he is like the ultimate Gary Stu, lol But that's the point of his character, the Batman is supposed to be this monument of morality. They did the batsex just for controversy. It's a filthy strategy, but we have to acknowledge that this strategy works in a twisted way. It got people interested on this animation, even the ones who already read the original comic. They could change the character in alternative universes, change his personality, "powers", identities, etc.. Doesn't really matter, the character of Batman is already established as this monument that you brilliantly exemplified.
shareI agree with you acesso, the ball was dropped big time in making Barbara a whiny, hyper-sexualised teenager that batman gives in to. It derails the movie and its focus.
It's unfortunate, because I think that if intro was modified to enforce a platonic mentor-student relationship with a strong emphasises Barbara's in-ability to "not go into the abyss" it would have complimented the Killing Joke section of the movie much better. The main theme of the Killing Joke is the insanity of Gordan and the Joker pushing Batman to the very limit. Why not have the sub-plot explore this and have Barbara recognise that she would eventually kill and decide to give up Batgirl for it? Wouldn't that make her a stronger character (perhaps even stronger than batman who eventually crosses that line) that the movie desperately needed?
How the hell is she '' hyper-sexualized ''?
What the hell are you talking about?
Are you some kind of a Catholic nun or something?
Batwoman is younger than Batgirl. This age sh!t is irrelevant -_-
shareBatman's love interest is supposed to be Catwoman, not Batgirl.
Batgirl belongs with Nightwing/Robin.
Here's the thing, Bats has always gone on and off with women whether you like it or now. Catwoman, Talia Al Ghul (for some reason is such a hearthrob for him), and Vicki Vale (for real?, a reporter?) are three I can name. Not to mention the scene between Bats and Babs was meant to be a mistake with them regretting it subsequently after. However this isn't to say Barbara can't have a full fledged relationship with Tim Drake or Grayson down the road (hell, she's even divided between those two as well). The love scene in this movie literally changes nothing at all. Plenty of folks with morals have done the same thing in and out of fiction when they've had an intense falling out. I believe it's called make up sex XD
shareBatman's love interest is supposed to be Catwoman, not Batgirl.Selina, Talia, Silver St. Cloud, Vicki Vale, etc.; but, yeah, not Barbara.
I'm with Otaku-sempai on this one...not that I'm for Batgirl being romantically linked to Batman.
I think in a strictly storytelling aspect it makes sense. Batman has a similar problem to Superman - the mythos is larger than the original character's intent.
Superman became overpowered and Batman became morally infallible.
They took the main theme of the Killing Joke and by adding the Batgirl subplot - raised the stakes a bit higher. Batman was just that more emotionally vulnerable because of 'this mistake'. It placed Batman on a bit more shaky ground against Joker's arguments.
Can any man lose his sanity if pushed far enough?
Would Batman kill if pushed far enough?
Now Batman crossed the line with Batgirl which was seemingly less temptation than wanting to kill Joker! According to many Batman stories, his greatest fight isn't against the Joker (or any particular villain) but against himself - always struggling to not cross that line.
Batman always returns stronger after failure...his failure with Batgirl, Talia, Robin's death and being defeated by Bane. Batman is an allegory about humanity.
Now what can be cooler than seeing a simple human entering a room of over-powered demi-gods and still being universally considered that baddest ass in the room?
Again, I personally don't care for the romance (hell, it made me downright uncomfortable) but I respect the reasoning behind it. It's got my dollar vote.
I respect your opinion, but I disagree with this statement
by adding the Batgirl subplot - raised the stakes a bit higher. Batman was just that more emotionally vulnerable because of 'this mistake'.
You have no idea what you're talking about. It's long been implied that Bruce and Barbara had a thing for a while. The entire point of it was that it WAS wrong for it to happen.
They both feel that way after the fact. Barbara was just a confused, young girl that always had a crush on Batman, not Bruce. Batman on the other hand, was lonely himself and went along with it because it seemed like something Barbara needed to do to understand that its not what she truly wants or needs.
Actually Batgirl (Barbara Gordon)was created for and debuted in the Adam West, Batman TV series. In it she was a librarian at Gotham City Library with a PHD in Library Sciences. This would have made her in her early 20s. At that time, most female superheroes were called girls (Supergirl, Batgirl, Dreamgirl,Elasti-girl, Hawkgirl, etc) all of whom were adult women.
shareActually Batgirl (Barbara Gordon)was created for and debuted in the Adam West, Batman TV series. In it she was a librarian at Gotham City Library with a PHD in Library Sciences. This would have made her in her early 20s,Given how long it generally takes to earn a Ph.D., TV's Batgirl was probably about the same age as her actress, Yvonne Craig, who turned 29 in 1966. I think that it was established in the comics that the Silver-Age Barbara Gordon graduated from high school early and entered college at 16.
now they use her as a sex tool again?
She was named Batgirl for a reason
You realize that they used the first half of the movie to actually develop her character instead of just crippling her to advance the plot?
In the comic, she didn't do anything other than get shot.
Are you familiar with the "Women in Refrigerators" trope?
I give f*@k zero. It's like giving no f*@ks, only without the calories.share
Look, I'm with you all the way. My response was merely to show Otaku-sempai that despite his assumption that they just used Batgirl as a sex trope, the writers actually tried to develop her as a character rather than use her as a plot device.
shareLook, I'm with you all the way. My response was merely to show Otaku-sempai that despite his assumption that they just used Batgirl as a sex trope, the writers actually tried to develop her as a character rather than use her as a plot device.Except that I never made that assumption. That is what the original story did. I stated that the filmmakers tried to develop Barbara better in this, but were less than completely successful and might have done better with a different take.
Look, I'm with you all the way. My response was merely to show Otaku-sempai that despite his assumption that they just used Batgirl as a sex trope, the writers actually tried to develop her as a character rather than use her as a plot device.
I give f*@k zero. It's like giving no f*@ks, only without the calories.share
Barbara: I wanted to kill him. I could almost feel my hands around his throat. And it felt like...joy. I think maybe that's what madness feels like. You know that day is coming for you, don't you? You and him. He keeps pushing you, you keep pushing back. How long do you think you can go on before something breaks?
Batgirl was created to be the love interest of Robin
Maybe acesso is thinking of the original Bat-girl, Betty Kane. She really was created to be a female foil for Robin. On the other hand, Dick Grayson and Barbara Gordon were made into a couple for a long time in the comics. Their relationship even survived past Dick's infatuation with Koriand'r in the Teen Titans.
"Hell hath no fury like that of the uninvolved." - T. Isabella
Ok how was batman demoralized in BvS? You do know batman bas killed gonna before...in the comics. One such time batman burned a while room of goons. Yes burnt them all to a crisp. That worse them anything he did in BvS.
shareThe killing corrupts the moral of the character. The same thing happened in this animation. What is the point of having 70+ years of character development to create key characteristics/elements if the other media took those established characteristics and *beep* them up? Doesn't matter if Batman killed before or not, his character was defined by his morals with development time. Corrupt those definitions and you don't have the same character. Batman is not a minor character like Thor or Green Arrow, there is some iconism involved.
shareBatman has always killed, you probably just didn't notice. His morals are always a grey area, that's what makes the character endure. The character has so many different variations and you're acting like they're all one. Hell, Tim Burton's Batman killed people. Having the choice whether or not to kill is Batman's moral dilemma, so Batfleck started out darker because of the Superman threat, then lets Superman live, but the tactics he was using were seen by other characters as more extreme than he'd previously used. You've been so busy with your moral outrage that you didn't see the character development that was central to the plot, starting with him branding a criminal and ending with him branding Luthor's cell wall rather than his skin. Every new version of the character has to go through this.
shareI'm pretty sure everyone has noticed the insipid 'character development' present in BvS. It's still a crappy movie with a crappy Batman.
The most beloved iterations of Batman never killed. He killed in his first comics and in some adaptations, but 99% of the time, his characterisation includes his no killing rule. This includes the silver, bronze, modern and New52 versions, the various animated series, the Arkham games, the 60s TV series and the Nolan films (although they cheated in those).
Tim Burton's Batman isnt Batman from the comics or any other media. It is just a guy dressed up as a bat.
I'll leave when I am good and ready.
Oh yeah in all his comics he runs around massacring goons with machine guins. For sure.
The point was in most (and the most beloved) iterations of the character his main rule is not to kill.
I grew up watching the cartoon and it creeped me out too. Even though she's supposed to be in her mid-twenties here(it's hazy). Batman's age here is a little hazy too. And they mention she'd been working with Batman for three years(makes you wonder why she's still so BAD at it). I'd say more, but I already said my peace on this topic.
There's always free cheddar in the mousetrap
I thought it was bloody disgusting! And for people to defend it because they think of their dicks rather than their brains is just sick! It shows that we don't think little of sex, its that other people think TOO MUCH OF IT! Why is that NEVER a possibility!!!
Batman The Killing Joke Review: - Skip to the spoiler section for an analytical reason as to why this sex scene was *beep*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZh_QExoSPo
Batman had sex with Catwoman and Talia al Ghul. He's human, not superhuman.
The movie might be saying that we all have our escapes in life: Gordon has his whiskey, Batman crushes the bad guys, Joker has his insanity, and Batgirl likes to get freaky. It all follows a pattern.
You think I'm crazy? Perhaps we're all a little crazy. I know I am.share
-Hugo Simpson
Yeah, but Catwoman and Talia didn't grow up (as kids) with Batman.
This is like a teacher beeping his students. Or worse, like an uncle beeping his nephews on their 18th birthday.
Barbara Gordon didn't grow up with Bruce either.
shareBarbara Gordon didn't grow up with Bruce either.Not in The Killing Joke graphic novel (novelette?), and probably not in this version either. Jim Gordon would have done his best to keep his family life separate from his professional life--including keeping Batman out of his home life.
It gets confusing with all the versions, so maybe she didn't grow up with Batman.
Still, he'd probably have some encounters with her as a kid, while meeting with Gordon.
In any case, the 'teacher beeping his students' is still not normal, especially for someone that's supposed to have more self control than the average Joe.
Not to mention she's his best mate's daughter.
shareYou're an idiot, OP.
--
Regardless of age, it's kind of a skeezy thing to do. Like banging your best friend's daughter. Seems like a betrayal not only of the mentor/student relationship but also the partnership of Batman and Jim Gordon.
Trying to create a funny, engaging YouTube channel. If you guys check it out, hope you enjoy what you see. Thanks in advance.
Review of the film here-https://youtu.be/V9xYZn3XRrk
A romantic interest between them isn't a new idea, he got her pregnant in Batman Beyond. It was Barbara who initiated things, so your complaint should be "I still can't believe that Barbara Gordon had consensual sex with her dad's friend" and the answer would be "So? That's not immoral".
shareOf course it's immoral, wth you talking about? Dick ended his partnership with Bruce in the beyond universe just because of this immorality.
I don't give a *beep* about alternative versions of the character. Future batman, past batman, pirate batman, etc... Whatever. The problem is that Moore wrote his story using the segmented Batman universe. The universe where Batman don't kill, he has his morals and etc. This universe is established, it's being used as the main Batman timeline for decades. If it is canon or not, regardless, the killing Joke was so succesfull that DC considered it part of the main continuation.
I don't really care about BvS, the Snyderverse, Murderverse, Depressiverse, whatever... It is a horrible Batman story, but it's an alternative take of the character. It doesn't make things better, but it's more easy to digest if we consider this Batman as something completely different than the established character. Even Nolan's Batman is something alternative. Changes on this kind of material are accepted, changes that improve some aspects (Nolan), changes that ruins the character (BvS, B&R, etc), doesn't really matter. Every Batman fan knows the iconic characteristics of the character: detective, moral compass and gadgets. That's it. For Batman to be Batman, the writer needs to use these established characteristics.
Well if you'r so bothered about continuity then there's no immorality because Grayson and Bats had fallen out years before and there was no relationship between Dick and Barbara. Look at his overprotectiveness as him having developed feeling for her over the years they were working together and then Joker's actions will be even more abhorrent due to inadvertently destroying Bruce's fledgling love life, which he probably needed more than he'd care to admit. Doesn't matter anyway, 'cos you're simply trying to retcon your initial, misplaced outrage about her age. How dare a young, single woman pursue someone that she's romantically interested in, eh? You seem to be so simultaneously clueless and well versed in Batman that you're either a genuine fan who ignores subtext or you're a troll using wiki to try and construct an argument.
shareI guess you just want the Adam West version. All these superheroes have either directly or indirectly killed many people. Imagine what your insurance premiums would be if you lived in a place with superheroes. Their actions have cost billions of dollars in property damage and an untold number of people getting killed or injured when this and other damage occurs. You have put these superheroes on pedestals when their creators (especially Stan Lee) know it's the furthest thing from it. They are all flawed and all make mistakes that cause misery. Take off your rose-coloured glasses.
shareBatman Beyond isn't an alternative universe. It's set in the future of the Batman in the 90s animated series and many animated Batman movies, including this one.
Make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.
Batman Beyond isn't an alternative universe. It's set in the future of the Batman in the 90s animated series and many animated Batman movies, including this one.Except that this movie is not set within the DCAU continuity that includes B:TAS, S:TAS, JLU, Batman Beyond, etc. And in the DCAU Barbara Gordon was never crippled by the Joker so far as we know. There is certainly no hint in Batman Beyond that it ever happened.
The point is... The Killing Joke is a separate story, it became canon in many Batman universes (the arkham games have their own spin on this story, for example). And most of these universes respects the source material. In this animation, Timm finally found his mainstream story to shove his Batgirl fetish into it, more people witnessed his vision of the character. With is a tremendous disrespect, to use the Killing Joke to instigate his twisted vision? *beep*
DC is free to use the killing joke to enhance the lore of the character, I don't see any problem with that. But they need to use it on a respectful way.