No excuse, it was a horrible way to break it to Tom,
Was it really? Simon could of gone home with his wife after "the dinner party", argued, talked... whatever... and by the morning had a game plan where he and Gemma (or just him) had a talk with Tom.
But noooooooooo.....Simon make THE CHOICE to go and spend the night with his mistress. Even AFTER Gemma said something to the effect of "home is where your SON is and I would think you'd like to have a talk with him".
Simon still make the choice... to go with his mistress. An incredibly self-center thing to do (even trying to have sex with the girl the next morning!).
Sending your child to his father and making him man up and confess to his child is hardly horrible. He rang a door bell.. Gemma didn't break in.. and then tell Tom to go upstairs to the bed room to catch them.
Even when Tom asked what was going on... Simon STILL lied. Which made no sense, because the kid was going to find out sooner or later.
No matter how you break it your kid.. he or she is going to be hurt. Gemma gave him more than enough chances to have a talk with Tom. Even when sending him to the door.. she was STILL giving Simon the chance be the one to tell him. The problem with children in Western nations is that they are not allowed to FACE REALITY nearly as much as other children are in other parts of the world. We want to "shield" them.. and we end up with weak, spoiled, adults who never know how to cope with many of life's tragic facts.
reply
share