MovieChat Forums > Spring (2015) Discussion > Boring, Moronic Explanation

Boring, Moronic Explanation


Anybody else notice this trend with newer horror movies to try to explain things in "scientific" (read: pseudo-scientific BS) terms. An unexplained, magical, mythical, Lovecraftian creature? Amazing concept. But a nonsensical, pseudo-scientific, ancient evolutionary mishap? Boring and intellectually insulting. If you want to concoct an intelligent, plausible sci-fi story with a realistic monster, go ahead--those stories can be brilliant--but don't create a fantasy monster and then try to explain it with gibberish exposition that includes the words "evolution" and "stem cells".

I honestly thought this was one of the best horror movies I had ever seen until the girl revealed her secret. It's truly a shame how these unimaginative imbecile writers manage to ruin potentially great films. They did the same thing with Digging Up The Marrow. "Hmm...an entire hidden world of underground monsters. Oh, I know, let's think of the dullest explanation possible. That'll be exciting!"

reply

I am just trying to get passed the first 22 minutes. The good reviews are making me stick with it.

reply

Perhaps the explanation of her condition could have been done a bit better. But if anyone here is "unimaginative imbecile writer", then its the original poster.

reply

What you hated was precisely what I liked very much.*

A lot of people have relatively little interest in supernatural horror because it couldn't actually happen. Give the same story a sci-fi rationale, and it immediately becomes more engaging.

I do think this is more a sci-fi movie than a horror movie. And there's a brand of sci-fi where you make the science just credible enough to carry the sort of story you want to tell (in this case, what it would take for an immortal to decide to fall in love and become mortal thereby). It's called a "hand-wave" by sf writers.

I would say the science here is actually more plausible than the explanation for the three-year life-span of the replicants in Blade Runner, which uses invented (but very plausible-sounding) jargon. Embryonic stem cells have just enough mystery left to make them a workable hand-wave.

*I do agree with the criticism that the way the explanation is delivered is relatively weak. If at all possible, you want to avoid any scene where one character explains it all to another. A better screenplay would have had Evan finding clues and evidence that allowed him to put a good chunk of the story together himself, with us in the audience experiencing the same "aha!" moment as he does.

If the girl had been doing animal studies that attempted to replicate her own condition, and Evan had found those ... e.g., at some point he finds out that pregnancy alters the fate of injected stem cells; cut to his flashback memory of the girl tossing away the condom.

Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

reply