MovieChat Forums > Still Alice (2015) Discussion > The Most Disturbing Scene ( testing the ...

The Most Disturbing Scene ( testing the audience's moral limits)


There is a scene in the movie that poses a genuine moral dilemma for the audience. I'd also argue that its morally instructive because it tests the limits of *our* moral identity.

I'm talking about, of course, the scene where Alice's past self communicates with her future self (or current self from our perspective later in the film).

I have to confess to finding that scene very uncomfortable. Not because I'm morally opposed to suicide but because it starts to resemble an act of murder.

We all know why Alice instructs her future self to take the pills: Alice can't imagine living when she no longer knows who (or where) she 'really' is.

From this perspective, Alice's message is morally defensible and its easy to identify with her choice - she wants to put herself (and her family) out of its misery. Alice can't imagine still being Alice beyond this point, and would rather die.


The only problem is that she is presupposing the very thing at issue - a continuity between self.

If identity is an expression of memory, then there is the question of whether they're still the same person throughout time.

Since Alice didn't understand (remember) what she was watching - go kill yourself now - then her former self had a questionable claim upon her future self.

I suppose what I'm saying is: I found that scene very disturbing because she was essentially telling someone other than herself to go kill themselves.

The Alice about to take the pills gave little indication that she knew what she was doing or why: if it was without her knowledge or consent, then we're not about to witness a suicide attempt but someone trying to murder an impressionable (scared and impaired) person.

How did you feel about the scene? Did it test your limits?

reply

Yeah, it pretty much wasn't suicide anymore. She didn't even try to answer the questions that the younger Alice mentions. She just accidentally clicked on the video.

reply

Well, it was still suicide because she decided it's what she wanted. She's still Alice, even when she's lost her mind a bit, or however you want to put that. But, she knew she didn't want to get as bad as she was getting. At the point she tried to take the pills she was so far gone, she wouldn't even think about suicide or anything like that. And maybe I'm wrong, but wasn't that after she wasn't able to answer the questions because she lost her phone so she couldn't do it, but then we saw that she was past being able to answer them? Maybe that was later in the movie, but either way she was obviously close to the place she didn't want to be, so it's not that important if she accidentally saw the video or not. I was just disturbed by a lot more than the fact that she decided she didn't want to live like that. I can understand not everyone would agree, but to call it murder is a little crazy.

reply

This is why my suicide plan kicks in long before I can't answer the questions. Alice waited until the point at which she couldn't have even told you what suicide is, which is why she couldn't get it done.

And there is some question of morality in telling Future Me to kill herself, because maybe I want to end it now, but Future Me wants to hold on to every last moment. So the moral thing to do, I think, is to kill Me, not Future Me.

Also, foisting it off on Future Me, who doesn't even know what she's doing, is kind of cowardly. I should at least take action myself, while I know who I am, what I'm doing, and why.

reply

Maybe recording the video for Future Alice was as moral as killing herself at that time would be. Everything that we do is affecting what will happen to our Future Us, sometime leaving scarce options for your Future Self to decide.

Imagine a situation in which you set an irreversible action to happen in the future. Is it "inmoral" towards your Future You to decide at a moment in the present (or in the past, depending your point of view) to do something what will affect you in the future (or present)? Is it cowardly?

You could probably see it as a back-up plan, in case something goes awry or just not the way you hoped. You would have indeed take action for yourself, while you know who you are, what you're doing, and why. The only thing that changes is that your action will have a more direct and more noticeable effect for you in the future.

reply

And there is some question of morality in telling Future Me to kill herself, because maybe I want to end it now, but Future Me wants to hold on to every last moment. So the moral thing to do, I think, is to kill Me, not Future Me.


Oh, that's a really good point. I hadn't thought of that.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

Hi

I hadn't thought about the scene from this angle and you really put a new spin on it for me and gave me something to think about. Thanks!

Fabulous movie - has haunted me ever since I saw it.

Susan

"I'd rather have 3 minutes of wonderful than a whole life time of nothing special".....

reply

Since Alice didn't understand (remember) what she was watching - go kill yourself now - then her former self had a questionable claim upon her future self.



There's your paradox and why your post doesn't make sense. If she didn't understand what she was watching it was exactly the time to do it! If she could remember what she was watching it wouldn't have been relevant. The fully aware version of alice is the one who wants to end her life and thats the version we have to trust. Although I get your point. The 'hollywoodness' of this film made sure she lost her phone so we skipped the part where she couldn't remember the questions

reply

There's your paradox and why your post doesn't make sense. If she didn't understand what she was watching it was exactly the time to do it! If she could remember what she was watching it wouldn't have been relevant.


As I indicated from the outset, the scene is disturbing because of what we know or are seeing.

From this perspective, the paradox becomes morally relevant - or rather, its a moral dilemma because of the paradox that emerges in our recollections of Alice.

You're claim that it was 'exactly the right time to act' because she no longer remembers who she is falsely identifying her past self with her future self.

Alice 1 and Alice 2 aren't the same person anymore: they become morally distinct entities when the connective tissue of time (via a remembrance of things past) frays the claim on her own identity.

Whilst the tenuous link between them might (paradoxically) justify the 'suicide' attempt, the paradox also raises the question of whether Alice's own instructions to herself invariably become murder.


We know the difference between the two Alice's and are able to distinguish (identify) them according to their sense of self.

The audience essentially becomes Alice's proxy or acts as her surrogate throughout time: the reason she's 'still Alice' is because of the continuity in our perception of her.

Paradoxically, it's also why Alice is not the same person anymore: we can identify or locate the difference on a continuum.

And the paradox is the reason why the ending is so moving - Alice continues to exists because of the connection that is displaced outside of her own memories or sense of self: within the loving bond between mother and daughter (and by implication, the audience watching).

reply

Very interesting oppinions.

Well, Alice had indeed changed. We ourselves change: our poersonality, our opinions, our decisions.

We can take a decision today and regret a year later.

In this case, I don't see the deeply deseased Alice as a new person. She is incapable in front of law, she needs somebody to be responsible for her.

She's not a new person. She's just a changed person. Lots of things we live on, including deseases, changes us.

In a country where eutanasia is accepted, and considering that Alice was required another person to be legally responsible for her actions and choices, wouldn't her own self from before the desease be accepted for that decision?

But on the other side, let's suppose that when she recorded the movie she had made the decision of dying when she was unable to remember the most basic memories she loves the most. But what if, when the desease developed and she was already impaired, she'd find herself happy and willing to live?

Back to what the movie gives us, I again don't see it as an act of murder. If Alice was hearthy enough to understand what she was being asked to do and to choose otherwise, she'd just not do it. But if she's impaired enough to not understand it, then she should just follow her own wish.

The whole point here, as with said, is that she didn't want to live and force her famility to live on a position that she changed to much to the point that she *seemed* another, empty, person.

reply

Regarding losing the phone, I don't see it as a "hollywoodness". I see it as showing how the desease develops, and how people are not prepared for it. When Alice recorded the movie, she was setting a plan, where she'd continue to test her memory and in a sad day she'd totally fail it, then face the instructions and follow them.

What I thought more probable, was that somebody else would find the plan and destroy the instructions, or find her while she was following them and stop her

But none of those was what end up happening. Way before she'd lose all the pointed memories, she ended up forgetting where she put the phone, forgetting the test. She never failed the test, and found the movie in an accident. And she was alone for nobody to stop her. But she was soo ill that she was even unable to follow the instructions to success of the plan. She didn't suicide and nobody ever knew about it.

Very very sad.

reply

I think you went off track toward the end there. She almost did pull it off. If her caregiver had come in a half hour later (maybe even a minute later), I think she would have pulled it off.

But I also wonder why you think nobody ever knew about it. You think no one came across the pills all over the floor? The bottle with "TAKE THEM ALL" on it? The video on the computer, open and easy to replay?

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

She finds the phone a month later, and she tries and fails to answer the questions then, doesn't she?.

As to the OP, sorry but I find it absurd to call it murder. She's obviously still herself. So far gone she cannot make any decisions, which is why she made them when she still could.

What's sad is that she couldn't go through with it.

reply

Hell, I could have cared less.

reply

So you did care a fair bit, then.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

There is a scene in the movie that poses a genuine moral dilemma for the audience.

Not at all, why?

She decided, with a conscious mind, that if a certain stage is reached, she wants to end it.
Perfectly fine with me, I routed for her and hoped she would make it.
Unfortunately, as we know, she was interrupted and was then doomed to vegetate through the rest of her life while her brain decays, only keeping the vital organs alive.

Most people who have a problem with that probably come from a religious background and are still indoctrinated with the false belief that "suicide is bad".
It isn't at all, why would it be? It only depends on the circumstances.
Do it out of clinical depression? Would be a loss, since this can be fixed or at least addressed.
Do it out of terminal illness?
Should be anyone's right to do then!
Who are you, or anyone, to tell me when and how to die, or rather what I am expected to endure and live through?

If you think of that, you might get my point.

reply

I agree totally with you. I in her shoes would hope that I wouldn't fail at this & her former self was very honorable & wise to try to plan it that way.

reply

Not all christians think like that. I am a Christian and I believe that we have the right to end our life when we know that our families and ourselves will suffer in certain moment from a illness or an accident.

reply

[deleted]

Who are you, or anyone, to tell me when and how to die, or rather what I am expected to endure and live through?


Exactly. It should not be a judgment call from some Governor of some state - your state - to make these decisions for you. This would be a difficult decision to make, and I am positive this film about much conversation about this controversial issue.

reply

I'm an atheist, and I was raised by atheists (or at least agnostics), so no indoctrination here. I don't believe that "suicide is bad" in all cases, and I think people have a right to do it. And while I was watching, I was rooting for her to succeed too.

But I've been convinced by arguments here that it's not as simple as that. She can't know when she's making the video how her "future self" will actually feel.

Think of it this way: a lot of people would look at an obese older person who uses a scooter to get around and think "kill me before I let that be me". Let's say twenty years from now, you can arm a little robot to watch you as you get old, and to inject you with poison if you ever "let yourself go" that bad. Is that right? Shouldn't your older self have the right to enjoy a life that includes a casino buffet and scooter ride around the mall with your friends, if that's what you're fine with "settling for" by that point?

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

I was sad that she failed. It's not how I would want to live.
Or so I assume. I'll never know unless it happens to me. And then I may not be able to know. I'm 65, and mostly love my life. But I can easily see 25 or 40yo me warning me against what I've now become. And 16yo me would blow his mind, if he knew how life slows down, and gets achy!

reply

Yup, that last point is what I was getting at upthread. I was sad she failed too, but think of how misguided your 16yo self would be if able to decide when it's "not worth living" any more!

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

I thought the scene was quite moving but I have a question. I listened to an unabridged version of STILL ALICE and I don't remember the later Alice finding the site, the pills, and then dropping them. I do remember the earlier Alice making the "video." Please remind me if the later Alice finds it in the book. AND NO CRACKS ABOUT NOT REMEMBERING, PLEASE.

reply

She found the Butterfly folder (which apparently held a letter altho the video was better) but she never found the pills. She was distracted by finding other things in the drawer, so either the pills had already been found by someone and removed, or she just didn't find them. Then her husband comes in and talks to her and she forgets about the whole idea. It happened very near the end, just after the scene where she is eating ice cream with John and he asks if she still wants to be there.

www.freerice.com

reply

interesting take, murder vs suicide.

reply