If he disabled the security the week before the purge, it seems he would have broken the law by breaking into the guy's house. The whole idea of the purge is to (supposedly) reduce crime.
I have to wonder if he was hiding out because he was somehow wanted for committing the crime of breaking into the guy's house to disable the security system.
If so, then he'd have to wait until after the police were no longer out there and able to run his license plate, find him, arrest him, and take him out of his revenge plot.
Basically, I asked myself the same question, but this seems like a reasonable explanation.
Even though the property owner wouldn't know about the crime, it seems like this government wouldn't care much about the victims--even to the point of involving the victim--but would take an extremely hard line on criminals. I don't think they'd be going for a fair trial in this world.
Just floating it out there... If not this, then he's a moron for waiting so long to go over there. It's not like there's a starting line or rule that you have to wait at home before you start purging.
A coward hides behind freedom. A brave person stands in front of it & defends it for others.
reply
share