Shameless!

They were. Proof of motive is not required in any court of law. Your objection in this regard is a non argument.
You didn 't do any research on this case. If you did, you'd know they weren't railroaded and received a very fair trial and two automatic appeals, which they certainly wouldn't have gotten in the US, UK or my country. In the US/UK they'd be well into their sentences after their trial conviction with no appeal.

The only viable research you could do would be to read the court transcripts and judges sentencing reports, which you clearly haven't done, hence your untrue statement on railroading. They let Patrick Lumumba go once they found out he was innocent, yet decided to railroad two other innocents, one a middle class US citizen and the other a rich kid from a politically connected family?
I notice also that when it comes to Peterson, you seem to be viewing the totality of the evidence against him, yet not with Knox and Sollecito. Why would the Italian system railroad two middle class defendants? There is no logical reason to do so.

No. Guede did not get a reduced sentence for "lying", stop lying. He availed of a fast track trial which automatically knocks a third of a convicted defendant's sentence. Knox and Sollecito would have also gotten the same reduction had they had have availed of a fast track trial. Your claim that he got a reduced sentence for lying is completely untrue and cutting deals are illegal in Italy anyway.

Again, no. Plenty of physical evidence, including bloody footprints by Knox and Sollecito, Knox's mixed genetic material- presumed blood- mixed with Meredith's in five separate samples in three separate areas of the house, including Filomena Romanelli's bedroom where neither girl should have been and where not a trace of Guede exists, despite the claims from Knox supporters that he committed the burglary using that room as an entry point, Sollecito's DNA on the victim's underwear and Knox's DNA on the handle of the knife that her trial and appeal accepted as the murder weapon, not to mention Meredith's on the blade highlighted their involvement also. Then there's their lies, changing accounts and alibis and Knox's detailed knowledge of Meredith's murder that even the cops didn't know at the time. Which also constitutes as evidence against them, in any western court of law.

Also, the Supreme Court have decreed that Guede did not act alone but that "his accomplices have not been found", so if you're saying that Guede acted alone, you're basically saying that Knox and Sollecito were acquitted on flawed grounds, something that anyone who has objectively studied this case knows.
Again, you didn't research as you wouldn't be coming out with such glaring falsehoods if you had have.

I have asked Knox supporters repeatedly over the years to list any legal, procedural or systematic errors that occurred at her trial or Nencini appeal. I got crickets in response so I invite you to do the same thing and validate your position that the court got it wrong. Whenever you're ready.
The supreme court otoh got plenty of things wrong- they reviewed evidence for starters, contradicted and overruled themselves as a body and made the same illegal remarks that they had annulled a previous appellate court for making.
Care to comment on these discrepancies regarding their acquittal?

I was convinced of guilt BARD by reading the primary sources. They're much better than your "TV reports".

They did have evidence against them. What do you think they argued at their trial and appeal if not evidence? What do you think the Defence cross examined expert witnesses on, if not the evidence?
In Italy the evidence has to be presented to a panel of 12 judges before the case can even go to trial, precisely to see if there's sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. If you're gonna lie or else engage in sheer irrationality by falsely proclaiming that there was "no evidence", then it's pointless attempting rational honest debate with you.

I have stated repeatedly that despite disagreeing with the SC verdict I accept it and feel that both Knox and Sollecito should be free to get on with their lives, so not sure what you mean by "let it go". Stop falsely asserting that there was no evidence against them and that Guede cut a deal and I won't need to comment on your falsehoods. Fair enough?
You haven't made one viable argument here, so come back when you do, thanks.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

The bleach has always been a red herring. The prosecution never presented any evidence about bleach in the trial and none was found in the murder room. Assuming they had used it, how would they have removed every trace of their invisible DNA from the murder room and still left so much of Guede's? Knox's DNA is only present in the blood outside of the murder room for the simple reason that she lived there.

Why would anyone wish to visit that hateful shill site set up by Chris Mellas (Knox's stepfather) & bankrupt fraud Bruce Fischer, where repugnant attacks on Meredith Kercher and her family consistently occur? There was a post there a while ago by the poster "Alex_K" mocking the Kerchers over their mixed heritage.
There was another post by the poster "annella" cajoling for autopsy pictures and yet another post by the poster "carlofab" accusing the Kerchers of "prosituting their daughter's memory for financial gain".
And that's just the tip of a very hateful iceberg.
People should study the primary sources, such as court transcripts as well as the relevant motivational reports on the verdict to make up their own mind, as opposed to PR quasi racist murderer groupie shill sites like the one you've just linked.
Alternatively a summary can be found here.
www.themurderofmeredithkercher.com
www.themurderofmeredithkercher.com/The_Evidence

WM3 are guilty also as far as I'm concerned and is a totally separate case anyway.

"Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!"