Learn History!


Do you know what I think of this movie as a Pole?
It's just another disgusting attempt to make Polish people look like they were collaborating with the Nazis... Almost as provocative as certain media writing about "Polish death camps", or Obama using that exact phrase...

Now some education for people who enjoyed this movie:

"Polish citizens have the world's highest count of individuals who have been recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem as non-Jews who saved Jews from extermination during the Holocaust. There are 6,454 (as of 1 January 2014 Polish men and women recognized as "Righteous", about 26 percent of the total number of 24,811 awards.

It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of Poles concealed and aided hundreds of thousands of their Polish-Jewish neighbors. Many of these initiatives were carried out by individuals, but there also existed organized networks of Polish resistance which were dedicated to aiding Jews – most notably, the Żegota organization.

In German-occupied Poland the task of rescuing Jews was especially difficult and dangerous. All household members were punished by death if a Jew was found concealed in their home or on their property. One study estimates that the number of Poles who were killed by the Nazis for aiding Jews was as high as tens of thousands, 704 of whom were posthumously honored with medals."

UPDATE: The Polish Anti-Defamation League (Reduta Dobrego Imienia) has launched a petition against the film, addressed to the state-funded Polish Film Institute, which backed the film, claiming that the film “fails to acknowledge the German occupation” and “that the viewer with no understanding of history may leave the film with the idea that the blame for the Holocaust lies with Poles”.

reply

I'm no historian. I did not feel that "Ida" portrayed the Polish people in a derogatory light. I did not come away with the impression that, as a nation, the Poles had been in cahoots with the Nazis.

Indeed the film suggests that old man Szymon protected Ida/Anna, her parents and her young cousin. In the emotionally fraught scene in the wood, his son, whilst digging for the remains of those he had killed, admitted that he had committed the murders. The film implies, I think, that the son's nerve broke - that he feared the discovery of those they were harbouring, and hence his family's destruction at the hands of The Nazis. The picture of Aunt Wanda cradling her baby's skull is difficult to dispel. But the picture of Szymon's son discovering that unburdening his guilt hadn't lightened his load was also very moving. I'm just thankful that life thus far hasn't burdened me with such a terrible dilemma!

reply

The remarkable thing about your comment is the film is not about the Holocaust. It is not even about "the Poles". Presumably, the term "Poles" encompasses people of Poland who may come from various backgrounds, cultures and religions. In your mind it seems to be only Catholics.

The film is about one Jewish family's story and it is very even-handed in its story telling, even from the standpoint of Catholic Poles. (Spoilers ahead): The hospitalized father was one of the Poles who protected the jewish family, at great risk to his own family. He says nothing in the hospital about how they died (we later learn) only to protect his son who was the actual perpetrator. That perpetrator even shows contrition and sadness for his act by confessing and leading them to their graves. He should have also killed Ida, but spared her life because he felt he could "get away" with it.

While comments on YouTube are usually worse than insipid, this one was quite good (from the "Ida" trailer):

TajgerTrzynascie - 3 weeks ago

Some Polish comments about the purported anti-Polish nature of the film speak volumes about the backward mentality of some people in our country today, and I'd like to comment on behalf of the rest of us.

Firstly, understanding the film as a story about "values" or "Polish-Jewish" relations is a misinterpretation: "Ida"'s poignancy is in its intimacy, personality and humanity. The dramatic power is lost when read as a parable or statement about sociopolitical issues. Its tone precisely avoids the sort of sweeping statements about history some would attribute to it. Failing to see the film for what it truly is not only butchers it, but also misrepresents the statements it does make.

Second, and, I think, more importantly, frustration about the portrayal of Poles and Jews displayed below is symptomatic of the conflict the movie concerns itself with: a bizarrely undefended assertion of an absolute dichotomy between Polish and Jewish identity. If the tragedies of the characters must be considered in terms of their historical or societal import, why must this occur in a "Jewish nationalist" framework, and not a Polish one? The story is precisely not about the holocaust, but about mid-century Poland, and the questions it raises concern our country itself, not just Jews, Catholics or Communists. If there is an injustice perpetrated in the film, it is the two-fold victimization of Poles - Jewish and Catholic alike - by two forms of totalitarianism, the historically latter of which perpetuated the hateful and divisive practices of the former with regards to Catholic-Jewish relations in Poland.

Totalitarianism effaces the humanity of the individual and privileges the group. Criticisms of "Ida" on the basis of political statements attributed to it, with no regard for its value as a work of art or the humanity of its characters, just goes to show how much damage the last century has done to our national psyche.

Wybaczcie, ze po angielsku - wiekszosc dotychczasowych komentarzy jest anglojezyczna. 

reply

It seems you have a problem with Catholics. Maybe you have a problem with the fact that the majority of Poles are Catholics? You must know religion has always played an important role in the history of Poland, there is no denying that. Poles were/are not antisemitic. Why would so many Jews live in Poland before WW2 if Poles were antisemitic? Also the film is about the consequences of the Holocaust and deals with what happened at the time it took place. The YouTube comment is offensive and was probably written by an ignorant leftist.

reply

I'm rereading my comment and trying to figure out how you think *I* have a problem with Catholics. I'm talking about what the movie is saying (and not just according to me).

However, I think that your reply pretty much sums up why you are doing your cause more harm than good by posting here:

>>"Why would so many Jews live in Poland before WW2 if Poles were antisemitic?"

This is called a logistic fallacy and if it is any indication of the way you are in the habit of reasoning then I think we can save a lot of time and breath by attempting any discourse with you.

In my original attempt to make the point, I use one of your fellow Pole's comments (should readers of this thread make the mistake of thinking that ALL Poles think like you.) And how do you respond to that? By taking offense and projecting some label on them that allow you to dismiss their thoughts, rather than reconsidering your own.

I think that is always unwise to "paint with a broad brush". All Jews are not the same and do not think about things the same. Similarly, all Poles are not the same and do not think about things the same. I have the feeling that I'm safe to say that Catholic Poles are not all the same and think about things the same, even about the Catholic Church itself.

Ida was NOT a movie where the message was; Jews = Good; Christians/Catholics = Bad. But you are right about one thing. It is about the consequences of the Holocaust and deals with what (had) happened at the time it took place. Why many Poles, like you, are unable to deal with those realities, even all these years later, is beyond me.

Labeling others that have different points of view things like "ignorant leftists" is the same sort of thing that, over time, gave rise to the Holocaust in the first place.

reply

You wrote: "Why many Poles, like you, are unable to deal with those realities, even all these years later, is beyond me."

Why many anglophones, like you, paint with a broad brush while claiming to dislike painting with a broad brush, is beyond me.

I found the word 'many' to be used as a poor excuse for making broadly-brushed statements ("Hey, I did not write 'all', just 'many'...").

reply

This is a polish film .

It happens in every society. Most people understand there is another side and that one film can't tell the whole story. It only tells part, this wasn't based on a true story was it?


ΔΨΨΔ

reply

jagamiga1

Spoiler!

No, this film does not represent real history it is however inspired by many real events. For example the character of Wanda Gruz is based on Helena Wolińska, a stalin ​public prosecutor which the director of the film met and couldn't believe that she had a hand in the death of so many Polish people.
Bloody Wanda is a creation purely artistic, which shows a Jewish woman who abandoned her own child to fight nazism and as a result she was caught in the web of bolshevizm, she fought as she herself stated for nothing and her guilt is destroying her (Helena Wolińska which she was based on apparently didn't regret her actions).

I'm a Polish woman and i don't think that this film is anti-Polish or showing false history. There were Poles that protected Jewish people, Szymon Skiba as shown in the film never reported Jewish people to the Germans, there were also those that killed them in fear of their families (the Nazis punished harbouring Jewish people by death) like Feliks Skiba who saved little Anna.
You cant search for symbolism to judge an entire nation in an artistic, intimate film with psychologically intricate characters. As I stated above there is no one true side of the story Polish people- the bad, Jewish people - the good, there is although a clear culprit of this tragedy the German invader - a Nazi.
I think it is clear for the people in the whole world who started the second World War and who is to be blamed for the Holocaust.
There is no talk of the death camps in Ida and the Polish patriots should help fight real slander of Poland, for example they could support 92 year old former Auschwitz prisoner, who sued the German television ZDF for showing the Polish death camps were run by Polish people and that they were the ones to gas people not the Germans, they should stop searching for slander in Ida.

The image of Pawlikowski is cameral, concerns people and their settlements with God and history and it is not to be generalized because that shows complete misunderstanding of the film.

reply

I saw the movie last night and loved it. I did not get the impression that the Poles were colaborating with the Nazis. It was about one case of a stinking father and son collaborating to take advantage of a poor Jewish family whose house and land they wanted. No more, no less.

My 100 favorite movies http://www.imdb.com/list/Uvw_F2_GMx8/
What are your favorites?

reply

In the building I lived as a child, we were all jewish. Many of them were polish and among those all of them said how anti-semite polish people are. How many jews are living in Polland today ? Not many I bet. No one wants to go back there.

reply

So you're implying that all/most Polish people are anti-semitic and that's why the Jewish community in Poland is relatively small (about 25 000)?

I'm not sure you fully understand turbulent Polish history of last century. Perhaps you should visit Poland, come to Kraków and attend the Jewish Culture Festival, you might be surprised how many Polish people enjoy Jewish culture and have fun socialising with Jews.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Culture_Festival_in_Krak%C3%B3w

reply

[deleted]

So:

- Polish children who repeat anti-Jewish sentiments = bigotry, hatred & innate anti-Semitism?
- Jewish children who repeat anti-Polish sentiments = reliable & impartial information?

Or maybe I got the meaning of your message all wrong?

Please inform me.

reply

I'm a Pole, who moved to the States 10 years ago- and I have no issues with this film- other than some minor editing and staging that made a few shots lengthy and awkward. A few points: 1. This is just a movie. 2. The point of it as a movie is to tell interesting stories of individuals as human beings. Not to make any broad statements about any nation or any group or forward any political agenda. It's not a documentary, it's not a history lesson. I also grew up with this tainted perspective that made me insist that Poles, Polish history and it's glorious tradition were all displayed through a lens that is kind and accurate as if the whole world watched, the whole world cared and made broad assumptions about the nation as a whole, be it a movie like this or some minor editorial in the NYT. I guess holding onto history and our uncompromising moral high-ground was something that really helped us through some tough times and allowed us to retain our identity. Polish media also add to this notion that whatever someone has written or filmed about Poland is of utmost importance. But the stark reality is that the world doesn't care either way and the movie industry doesn't have a duty to only depict attitudes that majority of people displayed. Similarly, it isn't "our movie" it's not a national treasure we all have a stake in, it's this filmmaker's vision. It's this girl story. If it's a minority tale, if it's the unusual and out of the ordinary, against the stream, the more interesting the movie becomes for presenting this however isolated tale. And the thing about making movies is everyone can make their own on or in response to just about anything. I really doubt however that anyone cares about "setting the record straight" outside of Poland, because a movie is a movie and history is history. Here's why Polish films were failing to connect with international audiences lately: too much history, too much pride about things that non-Poles can't relate to or understand and not enough good movie making. Stop living in the past, stop looking for validation in the history of once great empire and just move on. The world has for sure.

http://blog.lawyeronwheels.org Blog on disability, law and inspiration

reply

but the jewish militias in palestine had strong cooperation with the nazis through german embassy in turkey, they had one enemy, britain and one goal sending euraopean jews to palestine, these militias formed later the israeli army and produced israeli prime ministers, and the holocaust is largely a myth.

i mostly will not be able to answer your reply, since marissa mayer hacked my email, no notification

reply

As a Pole I don't understand your anger and post .
If you were to know history of at least level of middle school ,you would know that Yes there were Poles that killed Jews ,fom many reasons ,but I guess You are one of those that have idealized image of Poland

Anti-Polonism not this movie
Anti-Semitism not this movie

I could write a lot but I know your kind and I know it would be waste o my time

reply

As a non-Pole (and non-European) with a non-biased POV, I can see the OP's point. Poles are fairly routinely portrayed in films and popular culture as having a high level of collaborators and/or anti-Semites, along the same level as Ukrainians or Latvians (which actually *did* have a high rate of collaborators, etc.).

It seems especially a shame that this is so because as measured by overall percentage of any nation that faced the Axis in the Second World War, non-Jewish Polish civilians had the highest death rate, much higher than even the Soviet Union. No other group other than the Jews suffered so terribly, which makes the mistaken portrayal even more egregious. Maybe Ida alone doesn't push this message, but it is part of an overall trend that I've noticed.

reply