MovieChat Forums > Wyrmwood (2015) Discussion > 6.3?

6.3?

posted 9 years ago by joeesideshow
9 replies | jump to latest

Are you kidding me? This movie was awesome and a must watch for horror/zombie flick lovers. I have seen MANY movies that were MUCH worse with waaaay higher ratings. I think this should be at least an 8 but I am giving it a 10 just to help correct this poor rating. Anyone else agree a 6.3 is bull?

[–] goanna_38 9 years ago

Considering they shot it on weekends, over a 4 year period and on a budget of about $2 they did very well.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] destinedsleep 9 years ago

I absolutely agree that the 6.3 rating is bull. It doesn't deserve anywhere near a 6. I gave it a 1. What a crap movie!

[–] andrewhollingsworth 9 years ago

What film deserves a 1? Only films that have absolutely zero quality deserve such a score. There's very few films out there that are 1 bad. You clearly don't have a clue.

[–] hovee77 8 years ago

Yes a 1 is a ridiculous rating to give this masterpiece. It easily deserves a two?

[–] groovybruceman 8 years ago

Yes, this movie was pretty bad, but I think it deserves a 3/10 due to the utter hamminess and over the top acting. Although, what ruined it for me was the stupid sidestory of Brooke becoming Zombie Leader Supreme. The whole Mad Scientist stuff was so dumb. The best parts of the movie were with the guys, they were funny cuz of the purposeful bad lines and acting.

[–] mel2000 (244) 7 months ago

Although, what ruined it for me was the stupid sidestory of Brooke becoming Zombie Leader Supreme. The whole Mad Scientist stuff was so dumb.

Those two issues are 100% what ruined the movie for me, and their stories should have been left on the cutting room floor. They did nothing to drive the plot, and Brooke was used to give the movie its cheap ending. Very disappointing.

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]