MovieChat Forums > In the Flesh (2013) Discussion > The show is a homoesxual allegory

The show is a homoesxual allegory


Is my reading. A few ideas:

Becoming "a zombie" is not a choice the person makes. At a certain point it just happens to them, similarly to how at a certain point, someone just realises they are gay. The MP says in the first episode the rotters didn't "choose" to attack anyone.

A big part of the show is family acceptance. Ren's sister refuses to believe he is the same person at first, and the act of "coming home" from treatment was akin to the act of "coming out". Ren's parents awkwardly and uncomfortably accept him.

There is a strong line of bigotry in the town and a refusal to accept the zombies. The town is portrayed as a bit hickish, so I feel this works with the gay-bashing backwoods town archetype.

Ric's dad is fiercely anti-rotter, until he finds out his son is one. This happens frequently with more conservative families.

Ric "became undead" and then came home from the military. It's flakey, but one could draw some don't ask/don't tell similes there.

Ric and Ren just seem to have that relationship. Ren states his world was empty without Ric, that he kept the idea of "them" alive when Ric left etc. He even said they "fooled around" (though that could be read as them just goofing off or hanging out).

There are also a bunch of little things - the one guy saying Ren would have fit in at a girls school, etc. During the first episode, a few specific choices of language stuck out to me, but I can't remember them all. I don't know if the schow is TOTALLY about homosexuality, but in the case of Ren, it seems to be a metaphor. What do you guys think?

reply

I don't think it's an allegory about homosexuality specifically. The main character is literally gay, and it's barely touched—Something I love about the series.

I actually think it's intentionally parallel to multiple topics; homosexuality, race, mental illness… It showcases society's general refusal to accept anything that's different.

reply

The show is nicely done ( script, acting etc) but the homosexual allegory is not even subtitle..seriously even Romero, in his late bad movies, is not so explicit.

(anyway in the show is implied that zombies can have sex, how the hell is possible? there are a lot of absurdities ).

American zombie does show a similar theme ( integration of the undead in the society,"racism" toward them etc) in a more adult and complex way.

reply

In the Flesh is like X-Men and Dark Angel in that it uses supernatural discrimination as a metaphor for homophobia and other real-world issues. Unlike the others, however, In the Flesh combines it with the portrayal of actual homophobia. The "girls' school" comments and Kieren and Rick's "friendship" are examples of that, and don't add to the metaphor, as they are unrelated to PDS.

reply

It is not an allegory so much as overt propaganda. My how the BBC has fallen!

However is it really wise to compare homosexuality with zombies? Are homosexuals that unnatural?

reply

No, it is not.

It is the tribal nature of humanity and how our inner predatory nature is to behave monstrously to those not like us.

You see it as an allegory because homosexuals are often the target of one of the most powerful tribal mechanisms; religion.

reply

totally agree!

reply

I don't know if it's an allegory just for that, but it is certainly an allegory For prejudice.

http://www.hesaidshesaidreviewsite.com/

reply

for sure! I had the same thoughts from the first episode.

reply