Puzzlingly Bad


*minor spoilers - but nothing the coming attractions haven't already shown us

The movie had nearly everything a movie needs: a great cast, great locations, the great setting of WWII Europe, important and understandable goals, fantastically beautiful works of art, likable good guys and nasty bad guys, AND to top it all off, "based on" real events. But with all this going for it, the movie came off as lackluster and flat.
How could a movie, with all these strengths, fail completely to engage the audience (me, at least)? HOW? There was little tension, no suspense, no feeling of victory when the good guys succeeded, nothing to cheer about, nothing to worry about. The script was ho-hum, and a little too droll.
Don't get me wrong - this is not a terrible movie at all - it's just that it had everything it could possibly need to be a fine one, but just squandered its wealth with a poor script, bad timing, and humdrum direction.
If it were a James Bond movie or a Spiderman flick, where some tongue-in-cheek wisecracks are not only expected but obligatory, that would be different. But here, the attempts at humor were poorly timed and fell flat. A real man standing on an unexploded mine does not quip - only happens in a movie (and not a serious one, at that). If the movie's subject matter were lighthearted, if we were not supposed to care about the characters or the outcome of their mission, then by all means crack some jokes - just make them funny. But if you first encumber me with the weight of a vitally important quest, if you first preach to me that humanity would be lost should this quest be unsuccessful, then please don't joke and jive about it. A comic moment or two would be fine - if it relieved tension and moved the plot along. But there was no tension, and the plot simply stood still. Don't joke about it - instead, build some drama, and make me give a hoot about the outcome. Nazis are bad and art is good - most of us will agree to that - but it's lazy and unimaginative for a filmmaker to rely on these built-in values. You, as a filmmaker, need to introduce some drama, and make me feel something about the specific situations if you want me to care about your characters and get me involved in the outcome of their mission.

reply

Absolutely spot on. Really disappointed with the movie as I was looking forward to it. I was hoping for an old fashioned 1960's/70's style WWII action comedy, but it felt all wrong and in the end you just didn't care about anything that happened. Clooney has done better than this before, so I'm hoping that he has learned the lessons in time for his next effort.

reply

Agree also with all your points as I wanted to like this film more but in fact did not as a result of its drollness and what should have been and simply wasnt.

reply

Yeah, very disappointing... long gone are the days of "Where eagles dare", or "Kellys heros". The end credits which were accompanied by whistling, trying to hark back to the older war movies just made me realize how little I cared about the characters and story...

Gotta be down to a poor script and bad director...

Big shame, because I love WW2 movies.

reply

The only good thing to come out of this dire movie was the chat show Graham Norton with Damon, Murray and Bonneville being interviewed. Catch it if you can on YouTube - comedy gold.

"Free speech is the last line of defence against the tyranny of stupidity"

reply

BECAUSE... " a great cast, great locations, the great setting of WWII Europe, important and understandable goals, fantastically beautiful works of art, likable good guys and nasty bad guys, "
is the hollywood "formula" the producers package to get money from investors and is usually how a bomb is made. They totally overlooked story and script strength.

reply

And yet the film has grossed over 154 million to date, on a 70 mil budget... The film is ridiculously bad and I agree with everyone in this thread who has criticized it. It should have flopped enormously. So what happened?

reply

It's the cast of a Wes Anderson film but with zero of the charm.

reply

With such a great cast and a rating of 6.2 on IMDb I decided to watch this. Totally let down with a poor script and no character building or empathy. The storyline just plodded along failing to capture my interest. Gave up after 60 minutes.

reply

I'd consider doing a film about WW2 that fails to engage the audience has to be the most difficult thing there is to fail at.

reply

It's like they weren't even trying but all the actors wanted the write-off vaction time with one another.

reply

I guess I will be first one in this thread to defend this movie? I have no idea what you expected from it, but except for the smoking issue, I really enjoyed it. Okay, it will never be my favorite movie, but it wasn't bad either.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

The real problem with the movie is the director. Kudos to George Clooney for producing the movie, but he would have done his own movie more justice if he had hired an experienced director. The movie drags and lacks tension. Possible spoilers here! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*******************************************************************************
The real interest and suspence is produced by the real life search for the Bruge paintings and the Ghent MIchaelangelo.

reply