MovieChat Forums > Zero Dark Thirty (2013) Discussion > Why didn't ZDT make American Sniper kind...

Why didn't ZDT make American Sniper kind of money?


I thought Zero Dark Thirty was a great film. Had better previews than American Sniper, edgier direction and more interesting subject matter. Overall, a much better movie. But Sniper is making an insane of money. It made more in its first weekend than ZDT grossed in entire run.

Why?

Were (general) audiences not yet ready for an Iraq/Afghanistan War themed movie? Were they turned away by the idea of a female lead in a military movie?

You can't say it's the appeal of Bradley Cooper because he's been involved in some major box office disappointments. Or the Clint Eastwood aspect. Hardly anyone saw his underrated Jersey Girls.

So, what was it? Why wasn't ZDT a bigger hit than it was, and why is Sniper making so much? I would even argue that many of the people who lined up to see Sniper in its first weekend weren't even familiar with Zero.


"Visions are worth fighting for. Why spend your life making someone else's dreams?"

reply

One reason: Chris Kyle's death

reply

Because ZDT was painfully boring and left wing gibberish.

reply

All of what's been mentioned. Overall, American Sniper had a much more accessible marketing scheme going for it. It was a biopic about a recently deceased soldier very much on the public radar and was directed by Clint Eastwood. And I disagree, Bradley Cooper was and is very much a hot ticket, more so than anyone in Zero Dark Thirty. Then there's the sociopolitical aspects. American Sniper is much less ambiguously pro-America than ZDT.

Zero Dark Thirty on the other hand is a slower, subtler movie. It's more of a political drama than a personal one.

See you in hell, candy boys!

reply