MovieChat Forums > Zero Dark Thirty (2013) Discussion > 10x better than The Hurt Locker

10x better than The Hurt Locker


Am I right?

reply

Yes, but that is setting the bar very low.

 Entropy ain't what it used to be.

reply

Agreed, but the point is that The Hurt Locker wins Best Picture, and this loses to Argo. What an odd world we all live in...

reply

The Hurt Locker shouldn't have won... And while this is obviously the better film, I think the Academy has a history of realizing mistakes afterwards and not issuing another Best Picture as a "Make Up Call." Argo may not be historically accurate(Most Films Aren't) but it's still a well made film with an interesting story. I'm not saying it should've won, in fact, neither Argo nor ZDT were the BEST Film, but that usually doesn't matter. DiCaprio had a handful of performances better than his in The Revenant but that was the one to take it. Again, it's another "Make Up Call" and it's not gonna stop anytime soon. Warner Bros should've been smart in 2005 and nominated Leo for The Departed. Not only would it have been earned, it would've been a great combo with Scorsese's LONGGGG Overdue Win.

Moral of the story? The Academy is a mess. It's a tough job to do. I think of a year like 2007 with the handful of ABSOLUTE Masterpieces and can only wonder how that went down behind the scenes... But then I see years like 1990 when Dancing With Wolves beat out Goodfellas and I just laugh. It's a Tricky Business, that's for damn sure.

reply

Absolutely.

reply

It's better than The Hurt Locker. But I think both films are outstanding. To me this one is re-watchable over and over, whereas Hurt Locker is a tougher one to sit through. There is something about Zero Dark Thirty's escalating intelligence sequences - some successful, some disastrous - that is incredibly compelling. Chastain is great, as is the rest of the cast. Not a single false note.

reply

Glad to know I'm not the only one who has a soft spot for ZDT. With all the War on Terror stuff and other b.s. aside, I'm a sucker for spy thrillers, and this is one of them, and a damn good one, too. I like how it shows the inner CIA workings over this manhunt.

And the third act raid was really good, very suspenseful. I praise Bigelow for trying to be as realistic as possible for such a raid, especially with the night-vision shots.

So if looked at as simply a movie, it's a fairly decent post-9/11 spy thriller showing the CIA workings from behind the scenes.

reply

No your not. It's the other way round actually.

reply