MovieChat Forums > She's Funny That Way (2015) Discussion > Jennifer Anistons Worst role EVER

Jennifer Anistons Worst role EVER

posted 9 years ago by mn2114
25 replies | jump to latest

The movie was ok, kinda cute. Kinda dumb.

But Jennifer was total *beep*
I have liked her in pretty much everything she has been in lately but she did not pull this off at all. Her acting was so bad in it that it almost reminded me of Kristen Stw,..... Ya that bad.
The role was just not for her. I can think of many actresses that that role might have worked but jenn sucked at it.

The rest of the actors where fine but my god that was by far Jennifer's worst role ever. Sad.

[–] benman46 9 years ago

She was fine, Kristen Stewart is a great actress and you are a twat. Comment on a film you've seen next time.

[–] KingChrome 9 years ago

Any Anniston ass shots? OR any other nudity. Perv watch helper please.

[–] bigmyc04 8 years ago

Damn. I don't think that you could be anymore off base. I don't know what people accept for decent acting anymore. The worst part of Aniston's character was her hair. Outside of that, she basically inhabited the role of that screwed up psychologist. I mean, her timing with her lines was great. What more do you need out of that character?

[–] myfbk_account 8 years ago

Ha ha. What's funny is that I rented the DVD 'blind' and did not recognize Jennifer Anniston till about the middle. Of course Imogen Poots was the star. But I liked Jennifer. I liked the movie, too. I suppose it's a good thing that we're all different that way.

[–] jéwé 8 years ago

I disagree. She steps out of her Friends character more often these days. That is a good thing. And I am also a fan of her and saw over 20 of her movies.

[–] tomdyball 8 years ago

I was delighted by Jennifer Anniston's explosive performance as Jane Claremont! Maybe I missed something, but this was the first time I have seen her outshine her glory as Rachel Green in Friends. Here she demonstrates that she has great range, great verve, and is a really interesting actress in the here and now.
Claremont's erratic, menstrual craziness is hilarious. It's also amusing how the judge completely misses it, and falls in love with her. But I could see why he did.
Imogen Poot's performance in this movie is also quite brilliant, but for me Anniston is the firecracker that lights up the whole show and made me watch it a second time - something I almost never do. Congratulations Jennifer!

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] gtbarker 8 years ago

She was great. Made me laugh all the way through. Funny movie

'Well I've got two words for you - STFU'

[–] DorsiaRes 8 years ago

She was one of the few enjoyable parts of the movie, and I'm not a fan of hers.

[–] mathmaniac 8 years ago

I've been a fan of Jennifer Aniston since 'Friends' but because she does comedy well and she's pretty and curvaceous and makes me want to go to the gym and work on getting a body like Jennifer Aniston's! However, I really recognized her acting skills when I saw her in a film called 'Management' with Stever Zahn. Unusual pair, no?

I am afraid to go back and see it again (I own it) because I'd hate to feel the slightest disappointment. When I saw it, I was struck by the utter sweet simple romance of two people meeting in a motel setting, seeming to have absolutely nothing in common, and really connecting in the dull Arizona landscape. I remember being moved by the performances and shocked that more people were not talking about the film.

It is the type of film you can yawn through and then go back and see again just to find out that you LOVE it. Or maybe it hits it right out of the park the first viewing - it's just an unusual little film. Jennifer Aniston is very good in it.

[–] thepartydjz 7 years ago

Wow, are you people for real? She's among the worst actresses ever, zero talent, zero range, your standards are quite low.

My Top 50 Films http://www.imdb.com/list/ls033211402/