And the Democrats call us traitors because we refuse to allow The Great Obama to step on us. It's a never-ending cycle. Also, do you not see the irony in your statement? You say that we whine about people slamming Carson and Cain because of their race, but don't you do the exact same thing anytime somebody dares to insult our President? Political correctness and so-called racism are eating away at our freedom of speech, and its time to stop that.
Also, people constantly refer to the War on Terror as an unnecessary war, but I still have yet to see anyone substantiate that claim and not been proven wrong. Satellite images showed terrorists moving chemical WMDs from Iraq to Syria, so the claim that Bush went to war to find nonexistent weapons is disproved. Also, what do you think the response should be to a group of terrorists hijacking our planes and driving them into our buildings and killing 3000 people should be? Oh wait, I know...diplomacy and talking amongst world leaders. Maybe even letting the money drain that is the United Nations make our decisions for us, or fair trials for non-US citizens that have no legal rights and are also enemy combatants. Hah, that's laughable. But that seems to be the default response to any kind of threat here. Look at the Boston bombing. The first terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11, and what does the DOJ do? Mirandize one of the radicals that blew up the bombs. What do we do to the Benghazi suspect? Bring him back to the states and Mirandize him. What do we do to get a deserter back from the Taliban? Trade them five of their top agents. Yeah, this administration really thinks these things through, don't they?
And you can thank FEMA for the lack of response to Katrina. And by the way, Bush was not at fault for that at all. I know. I was on the Mississippi Coast when the hurricane hit, and everybody down there blasted FEMA, not Bush.
Bush may have spent more than he needed to, but a lot of it was necessary for security. Need I remind you that he not only invested heavily in the military, but also created the Department of Homeland Security? Things like that cost money. Now Obama, on the other hand, wasted over $1 trillion on a program that 55% of America opposed, and greatly increased entitlement programs while he was at it, much more than Bush. Yeah, he's really being a President. You force things down Americans' throats without their say-so, that's called tyranny, not liberty. Sorry but it's the truth.
Bush may not have been the greatest President in history, but he was a whole lot better than this idiot we have now, who can't even set aside his own fundraising initiatives long enough to acknowledge that our closest ally is going to war over Gaza and that Russian separatists shot down a plane with 300 innocent people on board, something that, last I checked, is an act of war. This party we have now is not the JFK Democratic Party we had before, the moderates that we could actually agree with on a lot of things. This party is a party of Progressives that are interested in equalizing every playing field imaginable and de-throning America from the top of the world stage, something Frank Marshall Davis would be proud of, while our Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves.
reply
share
BlackJAC
10 years ago
Stop venerating the Confederate flag, joining secessionist militias, and singing Putin's praises--you know, the guy who provided the rebels with the SA-11 battery that splashed the airliner? http://youtu.be/Y7G8u5ZOm9Y
Satellite images aren't the same as hard evidence, Blinky, or else you'd be in a black site based on a Google Earth photo of your house as "proof" that you were sitting on a meth lab/child porn factory. You gops wanted that war so your boy could prove to his daddy that he wasn't a total frak-up like Daddy believed and it didn't matter how badly things got frakked up so long as you got what you wanted. Anybody who'd read so much as half a Tom Clancy novel could've run that pet project better--who spends a year warning the target that you're coming and then broadcasts everything related to it, including troop movements, on live television? If your attack's going well, then you're walking into an ambush, von Clausewitz. And it was that single pet project that cost $2,000,000,000,000, no thanks to the cost-plus LOGCAP which made everything way more expensive; my future Congressman would love to tell you about how he and some private contractors each built an Iraqi border fort and theirs took longer to complete and cost six times as much as his. How much of a dent has the Iraqi oil revenue made in that overall price tag, especially since we were told that it would only cost 1/1000 of that at the beginning?
It's also hilarious that the people most irked about Big Gubmint went out and created a whole new government bureaucracy at taxpayer expense in order to show that you were taking the threat you ignored seriously, as if reorganizing the existing supply of morons would fix anything. The Coast Guard must love having a third outfit to report to at this point.
It's so cute that the Party Of Personal Responsibility refuses to take any amount of responsibility for frakking up the Katrina response, instead blaming the agency that worked for them at the time. Perhaps you shouldn't have put the unqualified horse judge in command or spent all your time complaining about "liberal media templates" trying to make you look bad: http://youtu.be/1LsuOyMCPZ4
I also love how you gops don't believe that terrorists are criminals, especially when they blow up stuff that isn't near and dear to you gops. If such things had happened in Atlanta or Dallas or Phoenix, you gops might've actually been motivated to bag the frakkers...but since they happened in liberal strongholds like Boston and New York City, they're simply casualties of war to you.
And incidentally, the Democratic Party of JFK's time was the beginning of both the Hollywood connection (http://youtu.be/QCd_fuOyuA8) and the whole let's-pander-to-a-given-demographic-for-votes thing you gops love to denounce them for. How's Jimmy Walker working out for you in that regard? http://youtu.be/LWToxPni6Ic
Your replies will be graded & possibly used as material in future projects.
reply
share
jamest2014
10 years ago
Singing Putin's praises? Hardly. We're the ones who warned you about him years back. We told you he was going to make a land grab and start expanding his executive powers to a dangerous level. And did you listen? No, of course not.
And may I remind you that Obama gave plenty of notice to Syria that air strikes were coming, even giving them a nice detailed map of targets on live television? How quickly we forget.
So DHS isn't necessary to you? I suppose you favor the Big Brother surveillance project known as the NSA, which, yes, was started by Bush but infinitely expanded under Obama. At least the DHS can prevent a terrorist attack. The NSA couldn't even prevent the Boston Bombing, but they sure did have everything on the bombers AFTER THE FACT. Way to go.
And that is pure BS to say that we wouldn't consider 9/11 and the Boston Bombing tragedies simply because they occurred in liberal cities. WE were the ones that sent troops over there, nutjob. And all that we have done for that region is quickly being undone by ISIS, who has taken over the entire Middle East with little to no opposition. Why? Because we left. Thank you, Obama.
And we supposedly think that terrorists aren't criminals? Whatever man.
I don't know what news agency you watch, because I look at all of them, and I've never seen that kind of backwards thinking, ever. Maybe you've subscribed to some secret radio station run by Michael Moore? I don't know.
reply
share
BlackJAC
10 years ago
Your boy looked into Pooty-Poot's soul, remember? Of course you don't remember: if it wasn't broadcast on Fox Opinion, it simply didn't happen.
You gops didn't want to hit Assad. You also didn't want to hit Khadaffi, for that matter. You gops only hit the Taliban because the actual victims and not the base were demanding blood.
The NSA isn't chartered for domestic. That's the FBI's purview. And the FBI can't go to work without something called a "viable lead" because otherwise we'd do something stupid like, say, spend 8 years, 4500 lives and $2,000,000,000,000 on a rumor.
The Iraqis were clowns even back in 1990 when they were at their strongest and got their hindquarters handed to them in short order during DESERT STORM. Not our fault that you gops mollycoddled them like gangbusters so no more than three battalions out of 100 could fight unchaperoned.
If you believed that terrorists were criminals, you'd treat them as such. But since they've only hit blue states and not red ones, you secretly support their actions. It's the reason why you gops let bin Laden run loose for nearly a decade, and continue to masturbate yourselves bloody when watching 9/11 footage even as you gops bash the victims' families: http://youtu.be/o6347bWLpe0. Meanwhile Boston PD scragged and bagged the Tsarnaevs that same week, right in time for the weekend on top of that: http://youtu.be/u6JDF1Prrqk. Funny how competent you can be when you actually work the problem and don't preen and posture on Fox Opinion at all hours, huh?
So what say you stop pretending that you want to be friends and start drinking antifreeze? It really annoys liberals when you drink antifreeze.
Your replies will be graded & possibly used as material in future projects.
reply
share
jamest2014
10 years ago
I would be more tempted to debate you if you didn't have your head shoved so far up there. That was so far off base you might as well be on another planet. I really am starting to think I've been talking to a Michael Moore addict.
reply
share
BlackJAC
10 years ago
God forbid somebody show up and shatter your belief-based worldview with a little thing like Reality and its well-known liberal bias, huh? http://youtu.be/YKRFlNryaWw?t=29s
Your replies will be graded & possibly used as material in future projects.
reply
share