How could you not like collection if you LOVED collector ?
SPOILER!
I am observing that people who enjoyed the 1st one blame this one for lack of...how can i put it....lack of being exactly like the first one. Because yes let's admit the first one independently was better. BUT...
BUT...
BUT...
BUT...
If you are emotionally connected to the hero and still remember how he went back for the little girl you can do nothing else but praise and yell in the last 10 minutes like a dog seeing his master after 2 weeks. Screaming "Kill him" in the meantime.
What i wanna say is that I laugh at people who find this "ridicilous" and "ripoff" etc. If you are such big critics watch a classical Hitchcock movie. Watch David Lynch. Watch Bergman. Watch flawless japanese horror (i like only some of them). Hollywood horror is something else. And this movie was exactly that. A GREAT Hollywood horror movie where a little girl breaks a man's arm in order to escape BUT forget to blow out the wick of the upcoming explosion. A movie that they do not take the machine guns of the dead. A movie where the only unarmed man leads the way with a torch (!). A movie where the villain accidentally his own dog. As i was saying a GREAT GREAT hollywood hoorror movie.
"*beep* you! *beep* you! *beep* YOU! "