BOYCOTT!
you and/or your children should avoid the untalented boy-band loser who molests women.
"There are 2 kinds of people in this world...those who watch The Credits, and ungrateful bastages"
Huh?
shareThis is a troll.
shareYeah, I assumed that:)
shareThen you assumed wrong. i am Discussing the issue(how nobody should support an untalented boy-band loser who molests Women), so therefore am NOT trolling.
Go Learn what words mean.
"There are 2 kinds of people in this world...those who watch The Credits, and ungrateful bastages"
When has Timberlake molested women?
You need help.
Try to avoid such ironic, hypocritical projection in the future.
Lucky you if you missed that untalented loser trying to ruin The Super Bowl by going around ripping Women's clothing off.
"There are 2 kinds of people in this world...those who watch The Credits, and ungrateful bastages"
Oh, man.
Janet Jackson did seem offended. Do you honestly thing that wasn't rehearsed a million times before it happened? What are you, two?
Quit being ridiculous and welcome to the real world.
Condoning sexual assault?!
For SHAME.
"There are 2 kinds of people in this world...those who watch The Credits, and ungrateful bastages"
You know nothing about sexual assault, and putting it into capital letters doesn't make you right. Read on the Super Bowl issue and inform yourself.
shareAgain, try to avoid such ironic, hypocritical projection in the future.
you are shamefully rationalizing and supporting the foolish double standard of "celebrity" "justice"...in other words, being "famous" is some sort of "stay out of jail free" card...if regular ol' "civilian" john Smith did the EXACT same thing, he would be in prison.
"There are 2 kinds of people in this world...those who watch The Credits, and ungrateful bastages"
The only one here being hypocritical and offensive with personal attacks is you, so before trying to tell me what to do take a look at your own manners. Again, if you think the Super Bowl thing wasn't planned or rehearsed, you're a bit naïve.
shareYou're either being obtuse, naive or both.
No sexual assault happened whatsoever, if you think it wasn't premeditated by Jackson and Timberlake, then I refer you to my first sentence.
So which is it?
Oh, and just to cut you off at the pass..... "try to avoid such ironic, hypocritical projection in the future" is meaningless drivel.
This signature has been deleted by an administrator.
Turn down your denial, delusional fanbois.(and just because you can't comprehend Big Words doesn't mean they are "drivel")
("rehearsed"?! like practicing and pre[-]meditation SOMEHOW make molesting ok?! for SHAME)
Go Learn Logic. Why would janet go along with it? Quit being so ridiculous. his CRiME not only increased repression and censorship...but it also encouraged all the racists and misogynists with their reprehensible blame-the-victim nonsense....which ENDED her career!
"There are 2 kinds of people in this world...those who watch The Credits, and ungrateful bastages"
Enough already, child! No reason to get ballistic because you have a disagreement with someone. We've asked for links. Being told to "google it" doesn't work since nothing shows up. So show your hand or stop whining, already.
shareSo now objecting to the molesting of women is "whining"?!
For SHAME.
(and Go Learn what words mean)
"it is worth noting that everybody devoted a lot more breath back then to a woman’s breast being bared than the WAY it was exposed—a 'man' reaching across and ripping off half her bustier in essentially a choreographed sexual assault. “Gonna have you naked by the end of this song” were the lyrics [the untalented boy-band criminal loser] had just finished 'singing'."-james Poniewozik
http://entertainment.time.com/2014/01/30/nipplegate-at-10-a-flash-and-a-flash-in-the-pan/
Ok, thanks for the link. Now I have context. Here's the thing about that - this was something that was set up by Janet. She wanted it because it brought her a lot of attention. I agree that the whole thing is vulgar and a bit upsetting and once seen, cannot be unseen. It was offensive that she bared herself and equally offensive that she had another performer assist her in her undressing. However, this does not point to Justin being a molester. Have you heard of a single incident beyond this staged one that involves him and sexual misconduct? Everything I've read or heard about him reveals him to be a decent human being.
As for "choreographed sexual assault", I'm going to disagree. That was more of a choreographed strip-tease involving two performers. There was no assault because it was the desired outcome. There was no victim, other than the audience. To tell the truth, I feel that it was nasty of Janet to set this up and involve another performer. The whole thing sounded so distasteful. It also sounded somewhat immature and I look at this as something stupid young people did several years ago.
Whether you agree with that assessment or not, you are in the minority. No one is going to boycott this film because of Justin and it appears that you are the only one in this thread who is upset about a staged incident at the super bowl so many years ago. Generally speaking, I don't boycott performers because then everyone associated with a film is being punished and that doesn't feel right. And in this case, I'm just not in agreement that Justin was so awful in his part in this. Further, even though I find Janet distasteful for her part in it, I'd still go see a movie she was in.
So, if you want to boycott the film and Justin, you go right ahead, but you haven't convinced anyone to join you and it's not looking likely that you ever will. Also, calling people "fanbois" isn't going to win anyone to your side.
Go Learn Logic. Why would janet go along with it? his CRiME not only increased repression and censorship...but it also encouraged all the racists and misogynists with their reprehensible blame-the-victim nonsense....which ENDED her career!
"minority"? ha! Read the article again. Application of even a little bit of Critical Thinking will show it certainly is sexual assault.(and even though election results apparently mean that a "majority" supports groping women, that doesn't make it any less of a crime...and i will not, despite your wishes, Quit opposing it.
Why would Janet have on nipple jewelry? Why would she admit that she planned it?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-207344/Janet-admits-planning-boob.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/nipple-ripples-10-years-of-fallout-from-janet-jacksons-halftime-show-20140130
Applying critical thinking and logic tells me the source of the article you provided is biased and the author has an axe to grind and wishes to turn this into an issue that it was not.
And no, "fanbois" is slang that you kids use these days to try to sneer at one another. It is not a diagnosis of any kind, let alone a clinical one. My warning to you was that if you wanted to win people over to your point of view, you're not going to be successful by insulting them. But your responses are telling me that you don't care if people agree with you or not, you simply wish to trash them and express your anger, otherwise you'd listen. Clearly this is a one way communication all from you to the rest of the world. We're not listening and YOU are in the minority.
Turn down your denial, delusional fanbois.
You write like an angsty teen.
(and just because you can't comprehend Big Words doesn't mean they are "drivel")
There was nothing big about your words, you simply managed to assemble them in an order that wasnt provoked by anyones responses, i.e. all a bit OTT.
("rehearsed"?! like practicing and pre[-]meditation SOMEHOW make molesting ok?! for SHAME)
Now youre kind of proving the "angsty teen" is less than rhetoric.
It was planned. How can an act that has CONSENT between both parties be molestation?
Quit your crying child.
Go Learn Logic.
Quite the comedian.
Why would janet go along with it?
Why did Madonna and Britney kiss onstage? When you can answer that, you will have your answer why Janet did it.
Quit being so ridiculous.
You first?
his CRiME not only increased repression and censorship..
So, reading that back, what Justin and Janet did means less nipples onscreen..........
.but it also encouraged all the racists and misogynists with their reprehensible blame-the-victim nonsense.
What victim?
...which ENDED her career!
Was Janet Jacksons career at some sort of high point when it happened?
This signature has been deleted by an administrator. share
You mean your delusional teenie-bopper fanboi denial about your molesting, untalented boy-band loser false idol.
AGAiN, opposing somebody who goes around ripping Women's clothing off is "crying"?
for SHAME, slimeball.
What a joke. Since when does the criminal's consent matter?
Go Learn the difference between a consensual kiss and sexual assault.
it certainly did end her career...try to be less irrelevant in the future.
Way too much emotion and nastiness in your messages.
It seems that you did not read my last post to you. You never responded. When you read something that pushes your buttons, it's important to look at other sources and to see what the opposing viewpoints say. In this case, it turns out that Janet, herself, admitted she set the whole thing up. http://www.mtv.com/news/1484801/janet-jackson-issues-video-apology-for-super-bowl-incident/.
Janet lost her reputation because she orchestrated a stunt that was not approved of by the people who hired her. It was completely inappropriate for the audience and it caused the covering network some embarrassment. Janet admitted that she set it up and claimed that it wasn't supposed to expose as much of her as it actually did. If you read the article I linked, you will learn that there was a wardrobe malfunction because the stunt was originally supposed to leave her with lace covering her breast. And then you would clearly see the nipple jewelry underneath it. That's still rather inappropriate for the venue and was not approved of.
Crying rape when there is no rape helps to discredit those who are actual victims. Nursing anger and outrage over a celebrity stunt is wasted effort. There are enough real problems in the world that need that type of energy.
You mean your delusional teenie-bopper fanboi denial
I'm in my 40's kid, you need to work on your insults.
about your molesting,
Didn't happen.
untalented boy-band
He quit didn't he?
loser
He's doing the horizontal bop with Jessica Biel, has a successful music and acting career, and makes more money in a year than you will your entire lifetime.
Yeah, I can see how that lifestyle might bring rise to calling him a "loser"
false idol.
Sorry, you think he's some kind of demi-god?
AGAiN, opposing somebody who goes around ripping Women's clothing off is "crying"?
You mean that section of clothing that was designed to be "ripped" away?
for SHAME,
Consent is now molestation..... someone didn't get the dictionary they needed for Christmas did they?
slimeball.
Really? Is this still an insult in 2016? If its meant to insult me, it doesn't work, i'm laughing at you.
Why don't you call me a cad or a charlatan next, I mean if you've no intention of being at least "current" on your insults, you might as well just dust off some other old words.
What a joke.
In polite company, you might well receive that distinction, others might not be so candid.
Since when does the criminal's consent matter?
Janet Jackson is a criminal?
Go Learn the difference between a consensual kiss and sexual assault.
Mmmmmmmmm...... irony overload.
it certainly did end her career
Pssst..... her career by that point wasn't exactly at a high point.
...try to be less irrelevant in the future.
I'm phoning it all in to be honest, you're scarcely worth the extra effort.
This signature has been deleted by an administrator. share
And not the happy dancing kind either. 😩
shareHe is a troll who is trolling "Trolls". ?
share