The End Scene


I thought the end Montage scene was excellent. The bulldozer knocks down the tree, disturbing the bats' habitat. The bat flies off, takes fruit from a banana plant. Makes a new roost above a pig farm, drops a piece of contaminated fruit that the pig eats. The pig is bought for a restaurant. The chef starts to prepare the pig when he is informed the customer (Beth Emhoff) wants a photo with him. Hand contact is made and the inter-title comes up Day 1. So who is to blame? Mankind's greed for destroying the tree?

reply

While it's true that the chef could have practiced some simple hygiene, ultimately environmental destruction is to blame. Eliminate natural habitats and the creatures have to cohabit with humans in their world. You could also include overpopulation as part of the problem (speed of transmission and spread of the virus.)

"Passion is just insanity in a cashmere sweater!"

reply


Yes, thank you, my GOD I can't believe it took this many posts before someone got it right.




´¨*¨)) -:¦:-
¸.•´ .•´¨*¨))
((¸¸.•´ .•´ -:¦:-
-:¦:-Oooh, sparkly!


reply

I think the scene could be taken as either a Hollywood liberal anti-development message, or as an example of a "butterfly effect."

reply

I thought the ending was excellent and very well encapsulated the essence. In a sense, yes mankind is to blame, at the very least, an enormous contributing factor. Deforestation leading to displaced species being forced to co-mingle with other animal species during factory farming, all lying a perfect foundation for creating a new virus or the mutation of an existing one. All of which, are man made contributors. LOVED IT!

reply


Yes I agree that mankind caused it with deforestation. Back when AIDS started it was said that it came from monkeys in Africa who had come out of the jungle due to encroachment from humans and they got into dumpsters.....came into contact with people......started the whole HIV thing. I'm not saying that this is what happened but that is what was taught at that time.

So, in other words, the chef could have prevented this whole disaster. Had he washed his hands properly while he cooked the pork, no one would have gotten sick. Also had he cleaned down the kitchen surfaces with bleach like you are supposed to after cutting/handling raw meat the virus would have been killed.

Bad chef!!



Love me some Waltons

reply

So, the movie's not so much a political statement about world ecology -- but a spanking at Asian food prep practices overseas.

reply

Hell's Kitchen, wash YOUR hands!

Uh baby U 4got to pull out. 9 months later, can U pull this "bleep" baby outta me, do that @ least!

reply

[deleted]

I think the point is you can't just blame one person.

The ones who ordered the trees to be fell played a part.
The people driving the bulldozer played a part.
The pig and the bat (although let's ignore these as being at fault).
The chef who didn't wash his hands.
These all helped introduce the virus into society.

Then there's Beth who with her behavior helped spread the disease; such as not washing hands after shaking hands with the chef's unwashed ones. Not washing hands before eating after said hand shaking. The affair in another city which helped it spread faster.

I'm not saying it's Beth's fault it happened, I rarely wash my hands just before eating as well. But everyone played a role in the disease going from nothing to millions of deaths. Lots of things lined up perfectly. Even that it was a foreigner that shook the chef's hands. Had it been a local, the disease would possibly never have left Hong Kong.

reply

I didn't see the chef wash his hands, and he mustn't of, since hand-washing was considered one way to protect yourself.

So, if he passed it on by shaking Beth's hand, then his hands weren't hygenic.

I thought the end would reveal that her lover first contacted it, and she got it when she slept with him.

reply

yeah, but blaming the cook is like blaming that mechanic guy a few years ago when that huge plane went down in South America somewhere- arrghh, I can't remember the details and I'm too lazy to Google, but from what I remember this mechanic guy, not an engineer or anyone very important, saw something flapping off a plane, and instead of asking someone or telling someone, he decided to tape it down with duct tape and went on his way. hours late the plane was in the air, completely full, and it started having problems- apparently that flap was supposed to actually flap and so the plane crashed. everyone was so mad, angry and distraught, and when everything was traced back to the mechanic people wanted to kill him!! He got death threats and was on trial and everything...all cos of a piece of duct tape!! For the want of a nail, a kingdom was lost, for the want of a cook washing his hands, the world was lost....meh, sometimes *beep* just happens

reply

you want someone to blame? how about the chef for not washing his hands or wearing gloves before stuffing the pig?

reply

Just sheer absolute bad luck. The really scary thing is, this is entirely possible. With everyone jetting everywhere around the world, it is entirely possible to spread "Virus X" just like in this movie, except for real. The CDC has said it is not "IF", but "WHEN".

reply

I think we are placing too much blaming on the cook. Theres a line somewhere in the movie that mentions a cluster of cases starting with a cook in Macau - I think the cook also died, and he is patient zero, not Beth. He was probably as good as dead as soon as he touched the pig.

If he had washed his hands, then maybe Beth would not have been infected, and it might have taken longer to spread to the US, but thats the only change.

reply