MovieChat Forums > Don't Blink (2015) Discussion > I expected some kind of explanation...

I expected some kind of explanation...


I love suspenseful movies, but this one has a zero hint of what happened. I wanted something, but it gave nothing. Some disappearances were easy to see coming, others, not. The young girl in the bathroom knew she was going to vanish...So maybe they all could"feel it".
I loved the humor of the red
head guy.the more famous
actors should of had more
screen time.
I was on the edge of my seat

reply

Movie was pure crap.

reply

The movie would have been decent if they at least alluded to a cause or theory of a cause. Like with the movie Vanishing on 7th Street.

reply

Seriously. The whole time me & my husband were watching the movie...I kept saying "I really hope this isn't going be a movie where they show no explanation for the vanishing". And I'll be damned if thats not what happened.



"But when the walls came down, the sh*t got real.." - Jenny Lewis

IheartRiloKiley.

reply

I think the point of not giving any sort of explanation was so that we would feel the anxiety that the characters were going through.

And there were some clues, not sure what they add up to but there were a couple. Like it the temperature dropping all of a sudden and there being snow on the ground. The lady said something like "the temperature has dropped like 50 degrees in the last couple of hours.

Also, whatever it is, it removes all trace that the person had been there, with the exception of the writing on the inside of the cabinet and the rope I can't remember anything at all being left behind. No clothes, blood, nothing. Gone.

There are probably other very subtle clues, but again I have no idea what they add up to yet.

By the way, I am right behind you.

reply

Thanks a lot! I must looked behind me!

reply

Yeah, this is one of my all time worst movies. And they gave absolutely no clues or evidence of what was going on. An awful movie.

reply

Here's what I don't get. Someone wrote the script, someone else read the script, someone else decided to make a movie about it. Someone else actually cast the movie. Someone else actually decided to invest in this movie. Someone spend at least several million dollars on this TOTAL PIECE OF CRAP. Didn't someone down the line have the guts to tell the actual decision maker that you need to make entertaining movies and not waste other people's time.

"Say, do I look heavyish to you? I feel heavyish. Put a note on my desk in the morning: 'Think Thin'

reply

Well said!

reply

Picardo is listed in the credits as 'Man In Black'. That would lead one to assume there's been some type of alien invasion...

reply

[deleted]

I am disappointed with the no explanation as well. Some movies are good when left to the imagination, or the movie gives enough clues to where you don't need such a definitive ending. But this is one of those movies that needed that. In any case, my interpretation was this: I do think the movie had a metaphor about how we don't know the meaning of life. The ending, she had that flashback of the guy saying something like "We can do whatever we want and it doesn't matter because in the end we all disappear." I think that was a pretty heavy line to end the movie on. So that was something I took from it.

Also, I think it did have something to do with a different dimension/time warp thing. There could also be some more symbolism in that if you start to take people and things for granted, you can and will lose them and can't fix it. That might not be the meaning for this movie, but I found that interesting as well. But as far the disappearing, I think they were being sucked into another dimension or time. The weather changing, and no animals or insects, things being not left behind but taken with them. It just all leads to some sort of portal literally opening up and swallowing them. I didn't understand the order in which it took them or why. I didn't think the looking at them or blinking or not blinking made sense, because there were many times people either looked away or didn't and it had nothing to do with who disappeared or not.

Also, it bothered me that we had really no explanation as to why the girl who was the last to stay was the last to stay. She pronounced her passion of why she wanted to, but so did the guy who wanted to get married and have a child. The guy who went absolutely crazy and was killing people and killed himself obviously wanted to live very badly or he wouldn't have gone *beep* crazy like that. So some sort of clue to why she was the last one would have been nice. The ending was interesting, I agree with some of the other posters, saying that it wasn't the others who disappeared but actually she who disappeared, and when she realized it that's when that guys quote came into her head and she basically just surrendered to the fact that they were all doomed once they got there.

But I do think, however that the cops and whoever else that were there would eventually start disappearing as well. I don't think government or cops knew anything about it, or they wouldn't have showed up at all and gone into the house. Obviously that area was a portal type thing, and even though the cops didn't know that, they were definitely screwed too once they showed up. So when they went into the house and she lifted her head and they were all gone, I think she was gone first. But they were also going to be gone. It was just inevitable. Just like in life, that's everyone's fate. It's easy to take some symbolism away from this film even if that wasn't it's purpose. My biggest issue with it, apart from not having a solid explanation to what was happening was why she was the last one to disappear. It was so completely random, and had nothing to do with blinking or looking away. I kind of enjoyed the film because the acting wasn't bad the premise was interesting but only because I was excited to find out the reasoning behind all of it which I never did lol. So, damn. I wouldn't recommend anyone to watch it for that sole purpose. I am getting sick of movies with no real ending unless it's better that way which sometimes it is. But movies with an awesome premise, and a solid beginning, middle, climax and ending are impressive. I wonder with these types of films if writers literally get lazy and in the middle of writing say "Oh *beep* I actually don't know where to take this... so...wanna just end it?" Kinda lame.

reply

Yes, my wife and I also thought that Claire (Joanne Kelly) was the principal character, and wondered if she was dreaming these events in a rather muddled way. That's why there appear to be some problems with coherence in the movie. But are they incoherent, or simply Claire's chaotic thoughts? We based this on Claire telling Jack how difficult it was for her to be an outsider, and how lonely she was. She seemed to be pouring out her feelings to Jack, which was strange because she apparently hadn't met him until she arrived at the lodge. Or is that really true? We think that she might have known Jack under a disguise, and been in love with Jack, and killed the other eight major characters to have Jack all to herself. Then she contemplated suicide with the noose hanging from the ceiling. And the minor characters at the beginning and end of the movie, who suddenly disappeared at once, rather than one at a time, like the major characters, were Claire's way of blocking them out from her dream state or mentally-flawed state, whenever she wanted to. Claire surprised Alex when she pulled out binoculars to look at the frozen lake, so maybe she used them to spy on Jack and his old and new girlfriend. The changing weather might also be related to Claire's changing mindset. The insects and birds disappearing might have something to do with her job at the university, which is unexplained. And Claire looked pretty mad when Jack told her he was putting his old girlfriend to bed. And the comatose Charlotte seemed to stare at Claire. Or could Jack and Claire be killing the other eight? Jack asks Claire if he can put Charlotte down. Does that mean he wants to terminate her like an animal?

Now, all this is pure SPECULATION on our part, probably because my wife and I saw the John Cusack movie "Identity" a few years ago. But I thought I would reply to you because you seem to be the only one of the commentators who are zeroing in on Claire. Mr. Oates, the writer and director of "Don't Blink," might have a totally different message. So my wife and I hope he will provide a sequel, and that's why he left the ending without resolution. If there is no sequel, then we will all be speculating. No one will know for certain what message Mr. Oates meant to convey.

reply

That is an interesting theory, and too bad they didn't think of doing something like this. The ending is just tragic.

reply

Well said!

reply

In reply to tinydancerXOXO

I don't think government or cops knew anything about it, or they wouldn't have showed up at all and gone into the house.


Government and local authorities are required, by law, to investigate the area of a crime scene. It doesn't matter whether or not they are aware of the existence of, what amounts to, the Bermuda triangle, they are required to eliminate any possibility of a crime(s).

So if the government of this fictional setting were privy to some unknown phenomenon that causes people to disappear, they'd first have to do a sweep, then quarantine the area and cut off access to the cabin lodgings, the nearby lake, any roads leading to the cabin and the surrounding forest.

Since the team sent to investigate did not return, more officials will be sent. I do wonder if helicopters will be sent to investigate the perimeter. It's much more effective than being on the ground but I suspect it will face the same problem as the crew in cars. The occupants in it, will disappear, like the birds and the insects.

The only best bet they have is the use of satellites and the space station view/scans of that area. Maybe information that angle could give them an idea as to how much area is affected by this phenomenon and at what point to cordon off "blind spots."

But back to the reason I replied...local and federal law are required to investigate disappearances of this magnitude.


reply

I meant if they knew that specific location was shady and some weird phenomenon like whatever was going on-- they happened to know "Oh thats the place people people vanish into nothing." like some small towns are aware of their town stories of serial killers and stuff like that. Of course I know that if the police are called and knnow something is happening they will go. But in a fictitious movie--- if the cops knew that was nomans land they would stop going because they know theyd disappear. And they dont want that. And obviously wouldnt want to all disappear and leave the rest of that area where people dont vanish into thin air with no officers.

So I meant they probably didnt know it was the twilight zone of areas that sucks people out or they would not have shown up out of stupidity.

reply