Strange film, not very enjoyable and here's why?
There's something off about this film. I've watched it twice and i cant put my finger on why it left me so cold. I'm a huge fan of Spielberg but i can't see his usual quality in this...
The film seems disjointed and well, cheesy. The dialogue is so odd, it stops you from engaging with the film and its characters. It lacks a sense of realism throughout and i think the problem, like many films that were originally plays and then adapted, is the strange need for the dialogue to over emphasize a sense of place and time. on stage this works but on film we have more visual clues to establish the scenery that the dialogue needs to be adjusted. The dialogue sticks out so much that it become distracting.
I felt manipulated throughout, that my suspension of disbelief was forced and not natural, that i was required to make the film work in my brain. It's so unlike in Munich or Scindler List where the visuals and dialogue connect to create a sense of realism.
Any one agree or disagree? I amm i right about the diaglogue?