MovieChat Forums > Oppenheimer (2023) Discussion > It's a movie you see once and never agai...

It's a movie you see once and never again 7/10

posted 6 months ago by ByTheVineyard (460)
5 replies | jump to latest

Informative historical movie, history is what it is, you can't blame the movie for boring plot. I was OK, not an 8 stars movie

[–] [deleted] 6 months ago

[deleted]

[–] ByTheVineyard (460) 6 months ago

This is a scientific movie about the history of science, it wasn't about tits... OK was there some tits but they wasn't the point, you are such a disappointment. let's say that Emily Blunt got her tits out, would that made a better movie? Perhaps it would have made some better visuals but overall it would have been at the same level with more tits

[–] Karl Aksel (1453) 6 months ago

For me, it would have worked better as a mini-series. A two or three parter, that way I might be enticed to watch it again. But a three hour long movie is discouraging, even if I'm not contractually obliged to see it all in one sitting.

[–] ByTheVineyard (460) 6 months ago

Time for me is not a discouraging factor to rewatch a movie (I watch LOTR extended once per year since it came out) It is a tiring movie, the events it describing are extraordinary until the blast at least, yet too many details about the relations between the characters, I didn't wanted to learn that much about this story

[–] quartz (402) 6 months ago

watched a movie called Margin Call the other day (enjoyed it). all dialogue, no effects. I'd say Oppenheimer was the same sort of thing, but about creating the bomb, rather than the credit crunch (and had an explosion in it)

I guess the reason I'd watch Oppenheimer again, is to read up on the history beforehand so I knew more about what they were talking about. I doubt I'd get anything out of just watching it again without reading up on it