Explaining the supposed problems of "Murder With Too Many Notes"

There are many things to appreciate about this penultimate installment, like the believable and realistic set-up, which is creative: The apprentice practicing on the roof of the theater, the long dormant elevator and the conductor’s motive, which isn’t just envy, but the threat of ruin and mass embarrassment. Jealousy goes back to Shakespeare and ancient Greek theater, but I find placing envy and status into the framework of Oscar-winning composition compelling. The episode is also an interesting window into the behind-the-scenes activity surrounding the scores to major films.

Yet there are seeming problems with the muddled ending, which can be traced to Patrick McGoohan's rewrites as director. He decided to use a musical demonstration at the climax in order to be theatrical, but the way it’s done does not lend itself to a satisfying “gotcha” response. The scriptwriter, Jeffrey Cava, included several clues in his teleplay that failed to make it to the screen after McGoohan's revisions. For instance, the ultimate clue in Cava’s script was particularly convicting and impossible for the murderer to dodge, but McGoohan prudently eliminated it for practical reasons. On top of this, it’s dishonest to say there is "no evidence" in McGoohan’s version. For detailed answers go to this thread at The Lt. Columbo Forum: http://pub10.bravenet.com/forum/static/show.php?usernum=806565873&frmid=6&msgid=1298800&cmd=show.

Others complain that Columbo’s slow drive home with the conductor is filler material. But the rumpled detective already sniffed him out as the murderer and needed to spend time with him to accumulate evidence and start wearing the suspect down in order to eventually break him. Columbo knows that when people get seriously aggravated they start saying & doing things they never intended to and thus reveal evidence against them.

As shot, “Murder with Too Many Notes” is somewhat of a headscratcher, but the answers ARE there if you look for them. Besides, what’s wrong with head-scratching when it concerns a murder mystery?