MovieChat Forums > Charlie St. Cloud (2010) Discussion > Honestly people, it wasn't that bad.

Honestly people, it wasn't that bad.

posted 13 years ago by SamaraShawn
27 replies | jump to latest

Okay, sure... It had some major plot holes. But, hello.. Most films do. It was all in all a pretty good film. Zac Efron showed that he actually had acting abilities. I loved Amanda Crew. And pretty much everyone acted really well in it.

The script wasn't horrible. And it was a gorgeous film. The use of the colors and camera angles gave it a really beautiful look.

It was a good film. So, honestly if you want to gripe about a crappy movie.. Go gripe about The Last Exorcism or Salt or something that actually sucked.

Thanks :)

[–] ibbi 13 years ago

Yeah, it wasn't well written at all, but the cast and general narrative kind of saves it, and makes it watchable.

___
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1TcDHrkQYg

[–] tjbsik 13 years ago

yeah i agree. It wasnt bad. 5.8 rating is pretty bad and undeserving. People probably didnt even see it cuz zac efron is in it so they gave it a low score.

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Shawclan5-179-721508 12 years ago

i didn't like it...it lacked energy...efron's performance wasn't terrible...but it wasn't great for sure...the dialogue was lame...none of the characters said anything insightful/intelligent...or even funny...it was just really forgettable

[–] ChristmasReviewer 10 years ago

Yes most films have plot holes and most films are not as bad as this. You must be very young if you enjoyed this film

[–] ausfi 8 years ago

You must be very young if you enjoyed this film

Hah hah haa, am I the exception then... I'm 78 and not romantic anymore yet I liked it.

[–] iCode_v2 8 years ago

Yes, it was.