By the end of the court hearings, I started finding it feasible that Salander really could be a psychopath. Her defense was able to discredit the testimony's against her (through illegal, possibly false means (the child porn on Teleborian's laptop)), but that doesn't change the fact that she could be a sociopath. Did anyone else think this?
shareHer defense was able to discredit the testimony's against her (through illegal, possibly false means (the child porn on Teleborian's laptop)),What are you talking about? The child porn wasn't PUT there by Plague, he simply COPIED the entire hard drive on which the child porn already existed.
This is the most childish thread I've ever seen, right next to some drunk texting with my ex when I was a teenager.
You guys arguing about who is right or wrong just to win and no one will listen.
It's a movie, and the book is also fiction.
There are not facts here that can be proven as in the court case in this movie where you provide evidence, because again, it is fiction and as such could be understood openly but at the same time you can easily conclude there are no real ulterior motives for the writers to leave such important plot information out, I mean if it wasn't clear one way or the other, when in doubt just go for the obvious, unless there is evidence of the opposite; by the end of the movie and the trilogy everything should be clear unless there is a fourth installment and then we realize the doctor was right and Salender was lying and had someone plant the child porn evidence and she is the psychopath and goes free to kill people.
All of which is possible since it is fiction and a writer could change things as seen fit, but I would think it unnecessary, and for now the facts are what are shown to us.
If this was a real life story, then I would see the need to know exactly how things happen, but even there ambiguous minutia is pretty much impossible to demonstrate.
This is the most childish thread I've ever seen,