they'd still be in a long distance relationship.. (spoiler?)
She's in SF, he's in LA.. I don't know.
shareShe's in SF, he's in LA.. I don't know.
shareYeah, I was thinking that myself. LA to SF is a six hour drive. Even though it's only a one hour flight, it's still a major hassle. Better than cross-country, of course.
I have a new philosophy. I'm only going to dread one day at a time.
/Yeah, I was thinking that myself. LA to SF is a six hour drive. Even though it's only a one hour flight, it's still a major hassle. Better than cross-country, of course./
this. even if ts only an 1 hour flight, flying is such a hassle that it would be a pain in the ass just to see each other once a month.
[deleted]
One is from America, the other is from Holland. Beat that bitches.
One is from earth, the other from Pandora...BEAT THAT PUNK
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
"One is from earth, the other from Pandora...BEAT THAT PUNK "
Haha nice one!
You can't swing a dead cat in hollywood without hitting someone with a vampire script
6 hour drive is really really inconvenient. Much better than a 6 hour flight across the country but still.. how often would they see each other? 2 or 3 times a month? That's not a very good relationship.
---
Idiots
Yeah, but if they made it work before, then they could definitely make it work when the hours are reduced... If you love each other, then it's worth it.
Born when she kissed me, died when she left me, lived whilst she loved me
Yeah it still sucks. He should just bite the bullet and move to SF. She was prepared to wait damn tables instead of do the job she really wanted -- he could have made the same sacrifice, but nooooo.....