MovieChat Forums > Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2011) Discussion > The biggest and most laughable plot hole...

The biggest and most laughable plot hole...


***SPOILERS WITHIN***

Forgive if I missed something, but Mrs. Cruise walks into a library. She asks to see a private collection, and with no questions asked she is personally escorted by a young guy who knows more about the topic than the expert she's supposed to be. Did you want us to believe that someone who lived out of researching a specific artist didn't even know he had a child? Or that a library around the block conveniently has several drawings of his that have never seen the light of day, but she "bumped" into them because the gardner told her so? Please... But the librarian giving her access to the most sensitive material without even asking her name was the best part.

The movie lost me here. It's the most cliched I've seen in a long time. I got up to the washroom by the end and I was thinking I would've been fine with not seeing the end. The creatures seemed more annoying than scary. Plus, once they had escaped, they had many opportunities to take the girl but they never did. The myth of the teeth and the deal with the church was presented and rarely used after. It has more plot holes than any other horror movie I can remember.

reply

I just don't understand why, after all the fuss at the dinner party, they didn't just move out. Or even let the little girl sleep with the light on. Seriously, problem solved right there.

reply

Just saw the movie, regarding the librarian, I think she mentions that she is working on the house, and he says something along the lines of you are lucky.

reply

thats after hes is about to show her everything

reply

Really... Did you not see how many times the creatures would make the lights go out so that they could do what they pleased... Seriously most of you guys are way over thinking this movie. If they explained every little bit of information that you all don't see there then the movie would be an hour longer. I would assume that most adults or teenagers who would be watching this type of movie would have enough common sense to fill in a few little gaps (Gaps that I didn't even see)...

As far as the librarian guys... Umm hello he is a nerd or geek and in walks Katie Holmes... I defiantly don't see any reason why he wouldn't be helping her with whatever she needs.And the material at the library was given to them from the family and was told to never be published meaning that he would "See what he could do..." About her being able to get copies...


PAY ATTENTION TO THE MOVIE IF YOU ARE GOING TO WATCH IT!!!!

reply

Lol...I agree. Actually the best part was when they finally broke into the library and the one GUEST just turned on the lights...Meanwhile the girl's stressing out because she dropped her ancient Polaroid camera (which begs another question: With 2 flashlights in the house why did her Stepmother give her a Polaroid Camera?) The same thing happened in the bathroom scene. She could have easily turned on the lights and ended the whole thing. This movie was riddled with frustrating moments as a result of extremely lazy writing. The librarian scene was a classic example of lazy writing - we needed another character besides the already cliche gardener to spoonfeed the stepmother critical details to advance the plot. And although the daughter uses a cellphone to call her mother, it might as well have been 1990 because it's barely used when there's actually an emergency.

reply

it was so implausible it was ridiculous

and i hated how there was 0 atmosphere and horrible cinematography

waste of time and money

reply

guys you also gotta remember i believe it was something emotionally wrong with the little girl cuz remember she takes some kinda pills and she has a psychiatrist at home. The only part i really had a problem with was the tub scene where she couldve just cut the lights on, but i realize she's a terrified little girl and i give her a reasonable doubt

Kill them all, Let God sort em out

reply

Ok lets assume there was something emotionally wrong with her. That doesn't mean she's mentally challenged, unless we want to assume the drugs she takes impair her judgement. Also the tub scene was absolutely ridiculous - who leaves a manic-depressive, medicated 8 year old to take a shower by herself and then goes to whole other part of the house where you can barely hear her? That is what killed me about this movie - it wasn't the fact that it was a fantasy tale, but more that you had to suspend logic as well as disbelief...

reply

What are you talking about? If anything it sounded like the girl was just on some ADD medication. That stuff is common with children this day and age and often causes depression and drowsiness, so it makes sense that she acted that way. She was only very recently suspected of being reckless, and maybe if it was her dad or his girlfriend putting her alone in the bath, then it might look kind of stupid. But the maid is just a busy maid. And Sally is too old to be getting washed by someone else. And the maid was only like 1 floor below her, and she HEARD her screams. That's how she got saved.

_

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself...

reply

Remember when the maid heard the little girl screaming from the bathtub? She hears the screaming, stops what she's doing, slowly walks closer, and listens more. She realizes it's screaming, and she barely changes her facial expression! If that were really a house keeper, and she heard the little girl screaming, wouldn't she panic and run upstairs immediately? Isn't that the snap judgment for a situation like that? Another stupid moment in a stupid movie.

reply

uh because the creatures would just turn it off and knock the lamp over, again.

reply

The idea that some book educated "expert" is going to know EVERYTHING is a hallmark of societal downfall. It's why your power takes 5 days to come back after a storm. The guys who built it aren't there to fix it, only young idiots who read about it. It's why officers come back in body bags from war and the coroner noticed they were shot from behind.

reply

It wasn't a good movie.
You never know what they cut around - in terms of the guy asking for ID, etc.
It was more bad writing than plot hole.
The screenwriters needed an "expo" scene - it was lame
The bigger problem was... the creatures could have gotten the girl several times. And didn't.
The film wasn't scary. every jump was telegraphed.

And does anyone think it should've been guy Pearce who went down the hole? Sacrifice himself for his daughter?

Lots of hype... don't believe it.

Don't be afraid of the dark? Don't be fooled into thinking this is a scary movie.

reply

"It wasn't a good movie.
You never know what they cut around - in terms of the guy asking for ID, etc.
It was more bad writing than plot hole.
The screenwriters needed an "expo" scene - it was lame
The bigger problem was... the creatures could have gotten the girl several times. And didn't.
The film wasn't scary. every jump was telegraphed.

And does anyone think it should've been guy Pearce who went down the hole? Sacrifice himself for his daughter?

Lots of hype... don't believe it.

Don't be afraid of the dark? Don't be fooled into thinking this is a scary movie"


There is so much wrong with this post I have no idea where to start.

"More Special!!!"

reply

Actually there isn't. He pretty much nailed it.

reply

Actually there is. So much. Wrong with. That post.

I can do this all day.

_

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself...

reply

Why don't you tell me, point by point, what is wrong?
Was the film scary? No.
Was every jump telegraphed (we see the creature go under the sheet before the girl does, so it's not a surprise when we see creature under sheet, is it?)
The exposition scene... it's lazy writing. Katie Holmes doesn't find out any of this info. She's told the info. That's lazy. Ask yourself this... why does that scene exist? We as the audience know everything that is told to us already. The artist/original owner dealt with these creatures, that they craved children's teeth, etc. You can argue the only new inofrmation that came out is "one life has to be taken." But the scene is mainly to get Katie Holmes up to speed on everything. We as the audience know everything already.
That's lazy writing.

I can do this all day too. Except of course, I actually state things and back up my points. Unlike you.

reply

I can do this all day too. Except of course, I actually state things and back up my points. Unlike you.


I'm sorry... All I could imagine after that comment was you snapping your fingers in a Z formation. Oh no you didn't girlfreeenn'!!

But wow, you're pretty full of it. Was the film scary? Even if it was with your stance there's no way in hell you'd admit it. Try admitting that. :P I on the other hand have the balls to say I was genuinely scared in that bedroom scene. It was one of those scary moments where you knew it was coming but just had to brace yourself. Similar to a roller coaster ride, when you slowly scale up awaiting the moment you get plunged down. There is nothing wrong with a horror movie using that method, and the way it was used in that scene was very arguably successful. But even if you truly weren't scared, it's ok. That's just your taste in fear man, and I'm not saying it's wrong to not find this scary. To each his own. The type of fear I felt in this movie was one I haven't felt since I was a kid, and I watch a lot of horror movies.

Lazy writing producing a getting-character-up-to-speed scene does not make the movie bad, I'm sorry. It destroys any chance of this movie being called a masterpiece, yes, but that's all. I really don't know why that one scene makes you hate everything else, but okay.

My gripe about you is not that you hate this movie, but because you feel self-important enough to come on this board and say thus movie is bad like it is a fact. When in fact it is just your opinion. Running around calling people mentally challenged for stating their own thoughts is pathetic.

_

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself...

reply

1stly... you're the one who said, "you could do this all day."

So your z snap girlfriend comment should be resevered for yourself.

2ndly... where did I say it was bad? I said it wasn't good.

If you bothered to read, there was more than just the one scene that makes this film not good. This particular post is discussing this one scene (again, read, comprehend - it will help you in life).

The bedroom scene was NOT scary. You clearly see the monster go under the sheet 1st. Hence, you know it's coming. It makes it less suspenseful. All you get is a cheap jump instead of a scare.

The gardner had an "accident"? He's near death by tripping repeatedly over lawn tools, which stabbed him several dozen times over and over again?

That alone makes the film weak.

You came to the movie and made fun of my critique without offering an opinion. That makes you self-important. I put my thoughts down, you didn't even bother, simply saying, "You're wrong, next. I can do this all day."

If you actually paid attention to the post topic... I disagreed with the OP. The scene we're talking about is not a plot hole. It's just a lazy scene. A movie is presented to the audience. The main character usually is the one guiding us through the film. We learn as they learn. the scene in question catches the lead character up on things we already know.

That's lazy. We as audience members are bored b/c we're hearing stuff we know. The scene exists b/c the filmmakers needed to get Katie Holmes up to speed on things so they could set up the ending.

Look at your own posts and then yourself... you're the hypocrite, self-important pathetic stooge.

reply

I wasn't even talking to you when I said "I could do this all day" I was talking to cleverqbin. I said that because someone said "There is so much wrong with that post"

At which point he said "Actually no there isn't."

And I said "Actually there is. I can do this all day." Meaning I can go back and forth with "No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes." because it's easy.

And right now even, you think were getting more in depth about the subject but we're just adding complexity to the oh-so-mature argument of "you're stupid. No you are. No you are. No you."

Saying it wasn't good is like saying it was bad. I mean come on are we really arguing about that? It's common freaking sense. I mean you say "the movie wasn't good. the movie was weak. The movie isn't bad." WHAT!?!? Can you explain yourself for this lack of consistency please?? Or can you at least understand why I might think you hate the film?

I already explained why the bedroom scene was very acceptable...As much as I hate repeating myself, I will say again that just because you know something is coming doesn't make it not scary. If that's the case for you, then good for you. But for many others, knowing something is going to happen can actually make it even scarier. If you cannot understand why that is, then there is no helping this argument and we should just agree to disagree.

I do very much agree that at least the police should have been involved after the gardener accident, but that is just another thing that could have happened off screen. Either way, it barely made me mad. :/ Mainly because as you said, we learn as the main character learns. I can't remember for sure, but wasn't Sally sent to bed right after that little accident? Therefore she wouldn't have seen the police come in. But that's all just a theory anyway. Hopefully it's a deleted scene or something.

Once again, I never made fun of your critique. I was just defending someone who I was agreeing with. I barely read your post, and I wasn't talking to you.. Forum battles, dude. :P Fight immaturity with immaturity. You calling people mentally challenged tells me how seriously I should take your opinion.

And the whole "was the library scene strong or weak" is 100% an opinionated debate! Because I can honestly say I was very intrigued during that whole scene, and it totally strengthened the creepy aspect of seeing Sally's identical drawing later on. I got chills. Now you can say that's because I haven't watched enough movies or something, but that's a whole separate argument. And a stupid argument at that.

_

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself...

reply

DonkeyKong wins; this film is weak and his posts speak to that issue quite clearly. Yes, it's all opinion but he was at least backing his opinions up with sound reasoning, whereas you mostly talked about how the film made you feel. Methinks you are easily impressed... that must be nice.

I can go back and forth with "No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes." because it's easy.

...but, why? Why do somethings so asinine and pointless? Seriously, I'm honestly curious why someone would have arguments of zero substance "all day" simply because it's easy. Enlighten me.

"Specificity?"

reply

It was a joke. I'm just saying we can go back and forth for days with these short "asinine and pointless" comments, but they will just lead nowhere. Read between the lines?

And now are we going to start arguing over what makes a critic correct? What next, how the earth was created? The connection between those two debates is that it is something we can debate about for days and NEVER reach an outcome. "Pointless," don't you think?

So let's just try to cut to it. Do I think this movie was a masterpiece? No. Would I even call it good? Probably. But there are many aspects of it that deserve to be defended, like the bedsheets scene.

You should also know that I'm comparing it to other modern horror films, which, as of recently, are not scary and have no essence. This movie tried a bit harder and took itself more seriously by not relying much on gore, cheap loud scare tactics, or nudity. That fact alone is proof that this movie, as a modern say horror film, is not weak.

But then again, I should just say it's weak so I don't have to keep going around in circles with you people..

_

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself...

reply

I think the A.D.D generation enjoy cheap jump moments. That's what the bedroom scene is. If there was a noise, that she goes under the sheet to investigate and you didn't know if it was real or just her imagination, then suspense builds and when the creature appears it's a genuine scare moment.

With us seeing the monster go under the sheet, we know she's going to find the monster - there wasn't even a mis-direction - so you know the jump is coming. It's just a matter of when. All the suspense is taken out of the moment.

That's why that scene is weak. You know the monster is there. And it's a monster smaller than her doll.

And why do the monsters wait until the film's climax to try to take her? They had numerous chances throughout the film including when she unlocks the grate and peers inside the basement hole. From the opening scene of the film, we're shown that the creatures have the ability to drag a man (3 times her weight) into the hole and down with them. So why did they not just take her then? Or the several other times they were alone with her?

I am not comparing this to any other films. I'm judging this film and this film alone.

All the choices I felt the filmmakers made were weak. Was it well-acted? Sure. Well shot? Yes. Good score? yes... that's why I didn't say it was "bad"... it was simply not good. It was vanilla, bland, but I reserve the comment "bad" for TRANSFORMERS 2, GI JOE, THE WOLFMAN... bad films that made no sense. This film made sense, it was just weak.

Understand?

reply

To me a cheap scare moment is when loud music bursts yous ears and the camera goes crazy but nothing is really happening. (Perfect example is in Boogeyman when the main character goes into the closet) But you still get startled becuase of the abrupt noise. Another thing is, keep in mind that we still didn't know what the creatures really looked like until that scene. This was like their grand unveiling. But I'm not repeating myself a 3rd time about why that scene deserves credit.

But about the other point, I guess the reason I personally didn't care about why the fairies hadn't tried to take her sooner was because I ironically know a lot about fairies, (I'm an art major, and had to study them for certain projects) one thing being that they are extremely playful and non-consistent/adolescent beings. They'll do things that don't make any sense, but in the end will do whatever it takes to get their way. Basically they were playing with their food. Remember how one of them pretended to be her toy bear?

_

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself...

reply

import22, that isn't a plothole.

reply

Correct.
A plothole would be something that doesn't make sense
The scene he's talking about actually makes everything MAKE SENSE
It's just convenient exposition which is the result of lazy writing.

reply

I don't know why I even come to IMDB boards after seeing a movie. I saw it tonight and thought "Hey, that was a kind of neat little fantasy/horror flick" then I come here and the posts are "OMG THIS WUZ TEH WORST MOVIE EVAR RAZZIE FOR SCRIPT MADE NO SENSE RAGE RAGE RAGE" "NO IT WAS PERFECT YOUR JUST STUPED!!" "NO UR STUPED THIS MOVIE WAS DUMB CUZ THEY DIDNT SHOT TEH GIRL BRUSHING HER TEETH BEFORE BED PLOTHOLE POLOTHOLE PLOTHOLE!!!"

Damn, it's just a movie.

reply

I'm assuming you are mentally challenged, correct?

If you don't like people discussing the films you just saw... then don't come to these boards.

To come on board and type madness - attacking everyone for stating their opinion - is pathetic. You, not the ones expressing their opinions about the film - is the pathetic, sad one.

If you pay to see a film, you have the right to comment - pro or con. If you don't like it, there are a billion other websites to visit. I suggest you visit WebMD and get diagnosed... STAT!

reply



No I'm NOT mentally challenged I'm RETARDET.

reply

******ATTENTION ALL "PLOT HOLE" EXPERTS*****

There's no such thing as EVIL TOOTH FAIRIES either!!! You want the film to exhibit common sense about killer tooth fairies????

I haven't read every single post here, but i hope you "plot hole" people haven't seen the original, because if you think this version is rediculous, you're going to HATE the original!LOL!

So friggin what! It's a horror movie, there's dumb plot holes in almost every classic! In The Exorcist, there are things flying around the kids room, and the mother STILL thinks it might be medical!!!!

It's just an entertianing horror flick. The funniest is the end....hmmmm, my girlfriend just got sucked down a well, but i won't get the authorities in on her rescue or just a simple body search. I'll just keep it between myself and my daughter. Oh yeah, Kim must have had absolutely NO next of kin!! I don't care!! It's a fun horror picture.....

reply

There's no such thing as EVIL TOOTH FAIRIES either!!! You want the film to exhibit common sense about killer tooth fairies????
Then I guess a film doesn't need any structure or logic at all because anything can happen. Sally should have shot all the tooth fairies with her Plot Contrivance Ray Gun™.


"I've been living on toxic waste for years, and I'm fine. Just ask my other heads!"

reply

I love how the gardener "accidentally" cut and bruised himself with every tool in his toolbox, hahahahahaha.

reply

I know. They got some real geniuses in that police department.

This movie was weak on so many levels.

reply

well, you know, he WAS pretty clumsy. He regularly ended up with a screwdriver sticking out of his body somewhere. They would have fired him long ago if he wasn't so good at planting mushrooms in a circle.

reply

Wasn't really a plot hole. Wasn't a Random library around the corner, it was the providence public library which is actually a privately owned public library which has thousands of collections donated to them over the last 150 years or so. She wouldn't know about it because his family assumed he went crazy and didn't allow his later works published, but he was already a famous naturalist

bad man make cody cry hurt.

reply

Every issue that was brought up in this thread went through my head as well. But really, its a movie and it was an enjoyable one. What happened to just enjoying a fun horror film without being a cynical dick?

reply

Because you kind of hope you get some value back for your $10 and 2 hours spent.

reply