if it was a controlled demolition in NY then how come the collapses started at each of the impact sites...great piloting to know where to hit the buildings exactly? How come the plane impacts didn't immediately start the demolition charges or completely destroy them?
Depends what was used to blow up the columns. If it was c4 that can't go off unless you use an electrical circuit. If it was something can go off through a source of heat, the bombs might have been in something fairly durable and heat resistant like a metal briefcase because if bombs were used, you're obviously going to have to hide them from the people inside the building.
As for skilled piloting, there's many possibilities here. First off it would have been more likely numerous bombs were placed on different floors. Next they just have to place the bombs on floors most likely to be hit because it would be easy to assume they weren't going to hit the towers on say level 10 for example. After this part it gets tricky. The thing about controlled demolition if you look up videos is that it's pretty hard to actually see which floors are the ones collapsing (you usually just see a building collapsing) and with all the smoke coming out of the twin towers, it would have been harder. Another possibility since the bombs only could've been activated via remote, they just activate whichever bomb they need on the floors. Finally the fire very well could've set off the bombs, just took them a while to burn through whatever the bombs where placed inside.
Originally I did believe the official story too and thought it was silly to plant bombs since isn't a plane enough? However things start popping up that says otherwise such as the fact many buildings have been caught on fire in the past too like these ones
https://more911.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/fires.jpg and most recently a 1,100 ft building in Dubai
http://thisthespot.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Skyscraper-Fire -in-Dubai-2.jpg. The fires in these buildings were massive and made all 3 WTC building fires combined look small and guess what? These buildings did not collapse. Then there are buildings that did collapse from intense fires and their collapse look NOTHING like the WTC collapses. Usually just parts of the building fall and it's always the badly burnt areas. The ONLY type of building collapse that match the WTC collapse are these type of buildings falls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbff_Ol-izY.
Then there's the tragic part how it's acknowledged there were people ALIVE on the floors where the planes hit or maybe just one floor above or beneath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3151MqXu52s. So fires that are so hot they can weaken and melt steel but not kill people? What?
Then there's how the engineers of the Twin Towers have outright said they designed the Twin Towers to be able to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 after another plane crashed into the Empire State Building back in the 1940s (but did not collapse it). Notice a lot of contradictions here from the official story?
Also who went out to Shanksville and carved the outline of a plane into the ground?
They didn't. The outline was already there. Here's a pic of the field back in 1994
http://www.whale.to/b/Shanksville_mine_1994.jpg.
reply
share