I think not. He is a "hard bastard", and he wouldn't care if he'd leave a girl pregnant. He'd rely on the pull-out method, and he wouldn't let a piece of latex spoil his fun.
shareOnly from Q Branch.
What no man Can give ya. And none Can take away.
This is a ridiculous thread.
shareDoes it look like he gives a damn?
shareYou know the woman has some say in this decision too.
Personally, I wouldn't let Bond near me with that disease-ridden thing without both of us wearing a condom.
Hell, what am I saying? Knowing his sexual history, I wouldn't let Bond near me with that disease-ridden thing PERIOD. Orgasms are fun, but not worth taking that kind of risk over. Besides, it's not like orgasms are rare. They're pretty easy to have.
The NY Post just published a story about some Hollywood A-lister who has HIV and has known he's had it for years. According to the Post, much of Hollywood is freaking out. While all I was thinking was "Condoms???"
You do realize that in the Bond world, not everyone knows about his sexual past, right?
I'm not saying people shouldn't have safe-sex, but it isn't like in the Bond world they know how many women he's banged over the span of 50 years of movies.
You do realize that in the Bond world, not everyone knows about his sexual past, right?
Oh, because Bond strikes people as the careful when it comes to sexual partners type?
If he's doing it with you, he's done it before you..........a lot of times.
Only to kill an assassin.
Speaking of which, can you imagine how many STD's Bond has had over the years? Must keep his own penicillin stash.
Sig, you want a sig, here's a SIG-sauer!
Everyone automatically assumes every Bond has screwed all the Bond girls, but if you consider only the girls that each has slept with in their series of movies, it's not that many.
shareIt's usually at least two a movie. And, since the movies usually only take place over a matter of a few days or such, that is another issue.
share