MovieChat Forums > Amsterdam (2022) Discussion > James Berardinelli review - **1/2 out of...

James Berardinelli review - **1/2 out of ****


https://www.reelviews.net/reelviews/amsterdam

With its whiplash-inducing tonal inconsistencies and sloppily assembled narrative, Amsterdam often feels like a pastiche of (take your pick) Monty Python, The Coen Brothers, or Wes Anderson grafted onto a crime caper/espionage thriller with a strong allegorical message about fascism. This is more the freewheeling David O. Russell from American Hustle, which also spun its wheels early before settling down, than the disciplined filmmaker who made Silver Linings Playbook and The Fighter. It takes well over an hour before Amsterdam decides what it wants to be and, by that time, viewers may be exasperated by the film’s quirkiness and exhausted by its meandering, unfocused storyline.

Considering that talent involved, anything less than a home run would have to be considered a disappointment. One of the downsides of having so many well-known actors vying for screen time is that none of them gets a chance to shine (not unlike in 2021’s Don’t Look Up). From a narrative perspective, the story (an opening caption informs us that “A lot of this really happened”), which fictionalizes a Depression-era conspiracy to replace FDR with a respected military man, is not uninteresting but it takes Russell too long to wade through the preliminaries. The movie doesn’t start building momentum until Robert De Niro shows up, and that’s more than an hour into the proceedings.

Russell’s attempts at screwball comedy are inexpert; he’s no Preston Sturges. One of the problems is that the lead trio – physician Burt Berendsen (Christian Bale), attorney Harold Woodman (John David Washington), and shut-in Valerie Voze (Margot Robbie) – are thinly drawn. They never become real and the romantic attachment between Harold and Valerie is stronger in Russell’s imagination than on the screen. By using a non-linear structure to establish the characters and their circumstances, Russell is more apt to confuse viewers than add multi-dimensionality to the characters. The first half is a muddle.

Chronologically, Amsterdam begins during the final year of World War I. That’s where Burt, Harold, and Valerie meet: they’re injured servicemen and she’s a nurse. After the war, the threesome travel to Amsterdam, where they enjoy an idyllic break from reality before Valerie disappears and Burt and Harold return to the U.S. – the former to become a physician obsessed with repairing the disfigurements of war veterans and the latter to study law. Fifteen years later, Burt and Harold remain friends but neither has seen Valerie since Amsterdam. That’s about to change, however.

Burt and Harold are approached by Liz Meekins (Taylor Swift), the daughter of their former beloved commanding officer, General Bill Meekins (Ed Begley Jr.), to investigate the circumstances surrounding her father’s passing. Contrary to the official cause of death, Liz believes he was murdered. It doesn’t take much to convince Burt and Harold that she may be right but a series of bad breaks and coincidences have Burt and Harold on the run from the law trying to clear their names. This once again brings them into contact with Valerie along with her brother, Tom (Rami Malek), and Tom’s wife, Libby (Anya Taylor-Joy). Tom wants to help and has powerful connections but is unwilling to stick out his neck…unless Burt and Harold can convince the revered General Gil Dillenbeck (Robert De Niro) to speak out in their defense. Against Tom’s wishes, Valerie accompanies the men when they leave.

Christian Bale’s performance is delightfully loopy. Burt, with his glass eye and penchant for slapstick, is something out of a Mel Brooks movie. Bale is matched beat-for-beat by Margot Robbie, whose bona fides for farce go back to her eye-opening turn in Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street. That leaves John David Washington as the straight man, the Bud Abbott to Bale’s Lou Costello – it’s a role that fits like a glove. The supporting ensemble is crammed with recognizable names. In addition to Rami Malek, Taylor Swift, Anya Taylor-Joy, and Robert De Niro, Russell (despite a checkered reputation) was able to attract Andrea Riseborough (as Burt’s wife), Alessandro Nivola and Matthias Schoenaets (as two detectives), Michael Shannon and Mike Myers (as bird-watching secret agents), Zoe Saldana (as Burt’s love interest – sparks fly during an autopsy), and Chris Rock. Of those, Saldana is underused and there’s a little too much Myers.

reply

Amsterdam’s politics are obvious to anyone who is looking. Although events transpire primarily in the 1930s, there’s little doubt that Russell is drawing parallels to today. This may be only one of many items on the director’s crammed agenda for the film but it’s one that is the most likely to draw fire in some quarters. While the parallels are imperfect, the screenplay does its best to italicize them, equating the worldwide rise of fascism and nationalism in the 1930s to similar political movements in recent years. At times, the observations are on-point but they are also a distraction, intentionally removing the viewer from the movie’s setting.

There’s no lack of ambition in what Russell attempts with Amsterdam but his goals outstrip his ability to achieve them. A lot of scenes and moments, taken in isolation, are effective, but the juxtaposition of so many conflicting elements creates an unwelcome tension between comedy, drama, and suspense that the filmmakers are unable to manage. The lack of chemistry among the leads doesn’t help the scattershot storytelling. In short, Amsterdam is a mix of good and bad – possibly the least imposing entry on Russell’s strong filmography but by no means unwatchable. It just requires some fortitude to wade through the first hour.

reply

That’s hardly a review. More like a spark notes of the movie.

reply