MovieChat Forums > The Tortured (2012) Discussion > Ending explained for those confused.

Ending explained for those confused.


The couple said the childs name during the torturing. Why did he write the note? Because the mental influence of the torture actually broke his mind and convinced him that he was the killer. He didn't do it to "give the couple relief or closure". This made me think of an episode of Star Trek: TNG where Picard was being tortured. I may get the number of light wrong, so please forgive. The torturer told Picard that he would stop the torture if Picard told him how many lights there were. Picard would say Four, and there WAS only four, yet the torturer told him there was five and would torture him, trying to break Picard into saying he saw five, when there was only four. As a final act of rebellion, picard told the torturer that there was four lights. Later in the episode, Picard admitted that because of the torture, he actually eventually SAW FIVE lights. This is sorta similar. The man in the movie was tortured so much and told "you killed our son" that he was broken down and convinced by the torture that he REALLY WAS the murderer. Naturally, he felt guilt and killed himself. Yes, they had the wrong man. But, due to the torture that broke his mind, he was convinced that he really did it. My apologies for any misspellings or gramatical errors, it is very late.

reply

But the cops knew there were two guys in the van, so why weren't they looking for the 2nd guy in the end?

----
Don't be a hater, dear. www.youtube.com/user/dinoatcharterdotnet

reply

Well the plot answer would be that they were more concerned with apprehending a serial killer than a man who was in jail for tax evasion.

The real answer is that it was not that good of a movie to cover those things well.

reply

Well done OP this is why i think the movie deserves a better rating but most people just don't get it.

And yeah that episode of TNG was good!

---------------------
"It's game over man, it's game over!!!"

reply

Regardless of the explanation, which really shouldn't be difficult for anyone to figure out anyway, the ending is still preposterous. The real killer that escapes the van just so happens to end up at the exact same farm house the couple and the tortured guy are at? Gimme a f'ing break. Out of thousands upon thousands of acres of land and the fact that you can surmise the couple drove at LEAST several miles away from the wreckage site to the farm house, and the escapee happens to just stumble upon the exact same place and finds the tortured guy while looking in the basement window. Absolutely ridiculous beyond belief. The ending ruined the whole film. I felt like they were trying to be clever and throw in some twists at the end like "Saw" or something, and it failed miserably.

reply