It's more like the degree bearing producers/directors/and such apparently do not like to keep great shows on TV for too long due to the attention span of viewers...or they think that they can come up with something 'even better'...which is something they are always looking for...and quite rediculous...
Pretty accurate. A few days back I got bored and started scouring the Network Television lineups of the 1990s. To my surprise, NBC's absolute domination of Thursday night television through pretty much the late 80s to the very very very early 00s was undercut by a lot of bad decisions.
They kept introducing new shows, they'd be *hits* and after a season or two (some even being shows that were in the top
TEN of all Domestic television programming) they'd cancel it because they thought they'd be able to squeeze a few more million viewers in front of the TV.
Pretty much ever single year after 1995 saw increasing declines in viewership until all their mainstays at the time (Friends, Will & Grace, Just Shoot Me). Without any familiar programming for viewers to look forward to, NBC pretty much dropped off the face of the planet in its 2004-2005 season and has been pretty much in 4th place since.
I also believe that Les Moonves of CBS actually has signed a deal with the devil, bringing us the first wave of reality trash television (Survivor, Big Brother, The Amazing Race) as well as predictable, by-the-numbers crime procedurals (CSI, CSI: Miami, CSI: NY, Hawaii Five-0, NCIS, NCIS: Los Angeles, The Mentalist, Numb3rs, Criminal Minds) and lame, unfunny, absolutely predictable - "set up, punchline, queue laugh track" - comedies (Two and a Half Men, How I Met Your Mother, The Big Bang Theory, Mike & Molly, $#*! My Dad Says, The King of Queens, Yes Dear, Everybody Loves Raymond). Almost all seem to be popular by the unwashed masses, I just can't wait for their programming to crash and burn.
"You've shown your quality sir. The very highest."
reply
share