MovieChat Forums > The Zombie Diaries (2007) Discussion > Film has an average rating of 74% on Met...

Film has an average rating of 74% on Metacritic (avg critic score)

posted 15 years ago by frog_foster
126 replies | jump to latest

Guys,

Check out these excellent reviews on the net I just found via MetaCritic:

http://www.horror-movies.ca//reviews.php?id=2619 - 10/10
http://www.moviesmademe.com/movie/review/1444 - 10/10
http://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/zombie-diaries-the-dvd - 7/10
http://www.close-upfilm.com/reviews/z/zombie_diaries.html - 9/10

etc etc

This is the best place to gauge a film's merit. The Zombie Diaries clearly stands out as one of the best of the new cinema verite style movie.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] comradebunny 15 years ago

Wouldn't the best way be to watch the film?

If the zombies are gonna eat us, we might as well be drunk.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

up to 78% now!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

Thats right it jumped after some new reviews.

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

79% now!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

Quite right

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

Nope - it's there. And up to 78% now!

[–] moviewizguy 15 years ago

I ran a search for zombie diaries on metacritic.com like others have here, and it does not appear on their database.
Yes, yes. It's quite obvious many here ae liars just to promote their film. I mean, is that such a bad thing? Who wouldn't to get their movie promoted? However, it's sad to see them trying to get people to watch their film by lying instead of having them be watched honestly...

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] moviewizguy 15 years ago

I agree.

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

it done well for such a low budget film - well done to the filmmakers

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

rubbish

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] maryfromeire 15 years ago

Good reviews.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

so true

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

Good !

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

7/10 is the average score everywhere apart from imdb, where the trolls have set up multiple accounts to try and bring the score down. Losers!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] peter-1502 15 years ago

I see a threesome in your future guys!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

funny

[–] jhray8417 15 years ago

garbage

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

Welcome to jhray8417! Another spammer! Fancy dedicating your life to this forum like ashvsreggie, its-infected and afromenace? Please do!

[–] jhray8417 15 years ago

nope. came here to check out the movie and noticed the outrageous and obvious pumping of this film and started digging around and came across you and your countless IDs.

so, like any red blooded american, i figured i'd do a real-time (and totally honest) review of your film. as i started to discover how boring and uninteresting it is, and posted that here, suddenly my post vanished!! wow, what a shocker?

you should be embarassed...not by the movie. all directors make bad films. no shame in that. but by your actions here...BOOOOOOOO

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

LOL #:

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

Its-infected is hilarious. This is a great film.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

lol

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

me too! 74% is damn good!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

cool

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] reggie_hammond 15 years ago

4.3.....

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] reggie_hammond 15 years ago

uh, not sure i'd be all that proud of and braggin' about a 74% on anything, ever, but if you want to go for it go right ahead.

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

You wouldn't brag about 74%? If it was my film i'd be well chuffed.

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

great reviews

[–] reggie_hammond 15 years ago

terrible reviews for a terrible movie.

4.3 for a reason folks.

[–] frog_foster 15 years ago

great

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

Yeh you're right!

[–] jhray8417 15 years ago

4.3 should be 2.3....

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

7.4

[–] BrunettesLoveEdward 15 years ago

1.7

I peed on the corpse. Can they do, like, an ID from that?

[–] NoseofNicko 15 years ago

[–] maryfromeire 15 years ago

oh yeah

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

Yes

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

Yes

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

[–] NoseofNicko 15 years ago

Wow... and you say that you're not a spammer!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tim_Williams 15 years ago

que?

[–] fermented666 15 years ago

Horrible spamming. This is why filmmakers should stay off IMDB. This is a terrible way for a person to find out about a movie, like I did. Very transparent attempt, boys.