I agree with you, except for the last bit. Day Break definitely was one of those few smart shows, because not explaining the time loop was the smartest thing the writers could do. Giving a definite explanation at the end of the show, now THAT would have been what I consider the "easy way out" for the plot writers. And it would have been a very bad choice too because, as someone else already pointed out in this thread, no matter what explanation they would have come up with, large parts of the audience would have been disappointed, which would make them love the whole show a lot less.
Knowing when to leave out what is part of the big art of screenwriting. You can let your audience develop their own theories, ideas and foreshadowings. Apart from the fact that it would have given the scriptwriters a lot more possibilities if the show was to continue, not showing and spoiling all the details makes viewers think and dream about the plot of the show, and add their own ideas. You just have to look at what most the discussions are about when people are talking about this show - they share their theories.
Just look at LOST and how successful that show is. They too give more questions than answers, and a big part of the show's success is because the huge fanbase is constantly creating, discussing and scrapping ideas. I loved the way Day Break ended. Giving closure to the dramatic storyline of that day, and giving the audience that feeling of "things are going to be allright", without spoiling the mystery of the show. And I seriously hope LOST will do the same thing, and leave some mysteries unanswered when the show ends in 2010. THAT is what I would call smart scriptwriting.
reply
share