Why was it cancelled ?


Hi guys,

I'm just watching this show for the first time, and I think it's great ! I'm french, I don't live in the US, although I get to be in contact some aspects of your culture daily, I am still not too informed on how television works in America. Well, I've seen the classic The Network, and have devoured enough American telly, but I still don't get why some things get dropped so fast and so unjustly. So, err, this show made it past the pilot, and to 22 episodes, which is good already. But they didn't keep it on for another season. Do you know why ? Any precisions about the channel that airs it ? The general reaction of the public to the show ?

reply

It was on NBC and ratings dropped pretty steadily after the pilot. There was talk leaked from NBC about cancelling at the mid-point of the season. I would argue that's when Sorkin became disillusioned with the show, and the writing deteriorated after that.

I heard that it was an expensive show, and the ratings were just not good enough for NBC to keep it on the air.

reply

Ok, thank you for the answer ! I guessed it had something to do with ratings, I was just wondering it there was any other reason (political, etc...), anything to justify the abortion. I was frustrated, and I needed someone to tell me it was not just because of the ratings. Haha.

I agree with you, it did start to feel like the end a bit too soon. I had started the thread after seeing 7 episodes. I should stop watching shows that get cancelled too soon, I'm going to develop a fear of abandonment !

reply

Personally, I think part of the ratings problem was NBC's decision to schedule Studio60 against Monday Night Football. Who knows what happens if they choose a different timeslot!

I read somewhere that CBS nearly won the bidding for the show initially. NBC certainly has (or had) a reputation of being less patient with new shows than CBS, so maybe the show would have had more time to find an audience on a different network.

reply

Oh, thank you for your answer, it sheds a little more light on something a decision that I find truly unjust.

reply

First a quick correction, the story about Studio 60's "impending cancellation" was "reported" by Roger Friedman of Fox. He broke the story about a week before NBC picked up the show for the full season (the back 9).

To go back to the beginning though, the show was super expensive because of the stars and the immense set, but also because of the bidding war with CBS. The problems the show had with ratings wouldn't have happened at CBS. The promotional ads for the show prior to its pilot advertised the show as the return of Matthew Perry and every commercial they cut all year highlighted a physical joke (the one that sticks years later is him breaking a window with the bat). This led to a huge audience tuning in to see a comedy and not being happy nor returning.

While the end result were ratings that were better than many shows that lasted, it was disappointing compared to those initial numbers and the expense of the show.

reply

Was wondering all that myself. It was a good show. By the way, if English is your second language, you write it very well. Your sentence structure is better than many Americans, (which doesn't cast us in a very flattering light). Good for you :-)

reply

Thank you for the compliment, I try my best. We do have the same phenomenon in France as well.
Some very insightful couple of posts have been published recently, dealing with the specific reasons why Studio 60 was so unfairly aborted. Just below :).

reply

The shows' ratings declined all season long as it was up against the NFL on Monday nights. I have read where even though it was not doing well in "live" viewings, it was the number one DVR show. In other words, people like me were recording it to watch later so they could watch the NFL live. This is important because shows make money via advertising, so if people are recording it and skipping the commercials, advertisers won't buy ad times. The DVR rating idea was new in 2006 and was not considered a good thing. Nowadays its being taken a bit more seriously. Had Studio 60 been on the air today, it might have survived another season.

Another issue is that the year Studio 60 premiered, the comedy 30 Rock started and had Tina Fey as the head writer. Both shows were based on how a show like Saturday Night Live is produced and Ms. Fey used to be the head writer on SNL. I think people were expecting both shows to be outright comedies and since 30 Rock WAS a comedy (and in a better time slot) it got the better ratings. Not that two shows should be compared to one another, but 30 Rock was killing on Thursday nights while Studio 60 was languishing on Mondays.

Both of these things combined to kill Studio 60. Personally, I loved the show. I think the writing was terrific and the cast was excellent. I just think it couldn't compete with the NFL and having another similiarly-based show hurt it.

reply

Thank you very much for the details. I can now precisely picture why such a good show was dropped.

reply

Ditto to everything that has been said. Although, from my recollection, 30 Rock's ratings during its first season were not stellar and in fact were lower than Studio 60's, it's just that Studio 60 was infinitely more expensive to produce. All that said, the two shows couldn't be more different and for all this show's flaws, I did enjoy it. It certainly deserved more time to find its proper footing, alas, at least we have these 22 episodes. In addition, it was poorly marketed and NBC is just a joke of a network most of the time. I can only wonder what would've happened with this show if CBS had won the bidding war...it certainly may have had another season.

reply

My understanding is that it was canceled because of the writers strike that yr. Several shows lost their momentum and then when the strike happened, they dropped some good shows I think the should have given anger chance

reply

All the things people are writing here are true, but if the show had been truly great it would have weathered those things. The real thing was that somehow it just never gelled enough. Perhaps it was too personal to Aaron Sorkin. I mean, he's writing a show about writing a show. He didn't have the position of a dispassionate observer. Matthew Perry in a lot of ways represented Aaron and Brad Whitford represented Tommy Schlamme. The trials and tribulations on the show must have been somewhat similar to the ones they had on Sports Night and The West Wing, the first cancelled and the second abandoned by them after the fourth season, neither one a happy ending.

if you compare to The West Wing, which was very successful, TWW had the notion that everything in it was extremely important. The presidency and the country's future was at stake, week after week. But on Studio 60 obviously that's not the case. Nor should it be. But if you want to have the same impact, you need to replace that aspect of the show with something else. Humor would have been the natural one to choose, but it was only occasionally funny. They tried serious drama, but only at the end when it was too late. Maybe if that had come sooner.

It ended up being a "sort of" a show. Sort of comedic, sort of dramatic, sort of meaningful, and so on, but it failed to grasp any of these options strongly enough to grab a big audience. You more admired the show than really enjoyed or obsessed over it. America didn't take it to heart. It didn't endear itself to us in that same way.

reply

STUPIDITY.

reply