MovieChat Forums > The Brave One (2007) Discussion > Film's subtle racism and stereotypes.

Film's subtle racism and stereotypes.


No, I don't want this to be a generic racism thread but I haven't gotten so offended by a movie due to stereotypes in a while. I'm half Chinese and half Puerto Rican and was so annoyed at the crappy overdone portrayal of New York. My minds a lil mixed up right now so I'll just make bullet points for the things that bothered me. Race-related or not. (Spelling errors I know)

- Yep, everyone knows if you walk around anywhere in New York at night you're BOUND to get either shot, stabbed, robbed, jumped, killed, or offered sex with a prostitute. (and in the middle of the day, you're offered illegal guns)
- I love how Jodie buys a gun, spends 5 seconds learning how it works, and PRESTO! She magically turns into a supercop with incredible aim! Dark at night and a guy driving a fast car getting ready to run you over and another girl. Nope not a problem for this strong women, she'll manage to throw the girl out of harms way, instictively pull out her gun and "BOOM HEADSHOT" the guy in the car in the middle of the night, while of course holding a the gun in a badass one handed stance.
- All mexicans wear tank-tops.......ALL WAYS.
- Black guys dont listen to radiohead!
- Another thing that made me just roll my eyes in disgust is when Jodie Foster is taking calls for her radio show and this one girl answers the phone. In the most obnoxious overdone hollywood "LATINA" accent, she says something along the lines of "yea ppl need to kno that NY aint no disneyland. We're getting our respect back!" Wow, just wow.
- "If you're gonna kill someone. Make sure the gun is legal." LOLOLOL WOW WHAT A FUNNY TWIST!!!
- I hate how everything in this movie just MAGICALLY seems to fall into place. Its extremely predictable.
- The two black guys in the subway scene was just so overdone and try-hard. I've seen every damn "ghetto" movie out there and this portrayal was so fake.
- Jodie can't play a straight women to save her life.
- Ugh, this movie screamed feminism so damn hard and obvious. Did they have to throw in "he" every single sentence when talking about the killings. You'd think they would "vigilante killer." But nope.
- This whole movie just seemed to be this drawn out stereotype filled borefest with "middle aged blonde hair blue eyed woman fights back against the big bad male minorities in NEW YORK!"

I think I'm pretty done so far. Thoughts? I'm from NY, btw.

reply

You have some valid points. I wish to argue a few.
-I don't know what the crime rate of NY is, but Erica found all those crimes because she went out looking for trouble. That's how she so frequently found it. I'd be willing to bet that if you continually ride the subway late at night, and go on long walks late at night, you'll find some interesting things. The first time she witnessed a crime, it just happened, at the mini-mart. And it wasn't so much general violence of NY, it was a crime of passion that happened to take place in NYC.

-Yeah, Erica's aim improved exponentially and unrealistically, especially since she never practiced in between killings.

-The portrayal of all Mexicans as "cholos" was quite blatant and obviously wrong.

-I don't think many black guys listen to Radiohead; it's not a racist thing to say, but they simply don't fit the major demographic, which is mainly composed of whiny, emo, melodramatic white teenage boys who feel that the whole world is a dreary, unfair place that would be better off destroyed, or at least filled with music that expresses the complete futility of existence. Black guys don't listen to Radiohead the way I don't listen to almost all rap.


-I didn't identify the caller as Latina; while the accent was exaggerated, I thought it was just supposed to be Brooklyn or the Bronx to show a "working class" type of person. Again, I'm not from NY, and am basing my knowledge of such accents on "My Cousin Vinny."

-The movie did have a truly terrible ending. It would've been one thing if Mercer hadn't been so resolute in his mission to bring the vigilante to justice; he did an inexplicable 180 in the cheesiest way possible.

-The black guys on the subway were also as appalling as the depiction of Mexicans; the only explanation is that they were extremely brief characters that had to pose a threat so Erica could kill them. It doesn't excuse it, it only explains it.

-I assume you think Jodie Foster can't play a straight woman because of the (probably true) rumors that she is a lesbian in real life. Sexuality doesn't automatically affect one's ability to play the opposite. You never hear someone say that an actor can't play a gay character to save his/her life. Perhaps they had so little chemistry on screen because they hated each other offscreen or something else. Perhaps it was just the wooden conversation that the script provided that made them unbelievable.

-This movie was NOT feminist. I am a feminist, and take offense every time someone says that this movie is feminist. This movie promotes the victimization that some "feminists" cling to; rather than showing Erica suffer that horrible ordeal and show her struggle to heal as a dynamic character would, they show her become Velma Vigilante and shoot up all the things that threaten, as you said, a white woman. It would be one thing if they showed her transform into a true monster, an emotionless, soulless killer who did so methodically and with a sense of purpose. It could've ended with her killing herself rather than going to prison for what she so strongly believed in. That might have been interesting. They could have completely changed the movie as I previously suggested; that could've been soppy, but it might've worked. They could have showed her seeking revenge on those who committed the pointless violence against her, and her personal struggle about whether or not to follow through. But no, they turn her into the willing "perpetual victim", who is torn apart by what she does every time. The reason the cops assume the killer is a man has nothing to do with feminism, either. The movie makes brief mention of the reason: statistically, women usually kill for personal reasons, rather than some warped sense of justice. The statistics are changing to be more equally dispersed, but murder is still generally a man's crime, especially when it comes to serial killers, as one could argue a vigilante is. Also, the pronoun "he" can be gender neutral; if you don't know the gender of someone, you usually say "he" rather than "he/she" or "vigilante killer".

-This movie certainly has social panic, escapist overtones. A woman is wrenched out of her idyllic perception of NY, and thrown into the brutal reality of its underbelly. Only the reality is accurate; it's a facade invented by rich screenwriters in LA.

reply

you guys are acting like she was getting all shots with fantastic grouping. she jsut hit the target, and from only a few feet away. Its completely possible for an inexperienced shooter to easily hit a target from a good 10 feet away i know ive doen it. her sloppy hits on a human torso from 3 or 4 are beleiveable. The black guys on the subway were not that far fetched it would be pretty easy to find some guys just like that. You act like by showing a few mexicans ( pricks that attacked her and at that one mexican bitches house)that means that they are showing all mexicans that way. alot mexicans act that way, about half my *beep* school acts that way.

reply

You dum**** they were puerto-rican, where do you think this movie takes place in California? I hope the Mexicans in your school kick your dum**** every day or else they are missing your ass.

reply

You dum**** they were puerto-rican, where do you think this movie takes place in California? I hope the Mexicans in your school kick your dum**** every day or else they are missing your ass.

you are a dumbass as well , what makes you think they were puerto ricans ?

reply

They were...in...NYC. I suppose there coulda been some Cubans as well, but realistically, the Latin culture in NYC is Puerto Rican.

,Said the Shotgun to the Head--
Saul Williams

www.myspace.com/ohhorrorofhorrors

reply

to Lizard:

I don't think many black guys listen to Radiohead; it's not a racist thing to say, but they simply don't fit the major demographic, which is mainly composed of whiny, emo, melodramatic white teenage boys who feel that the whole world is a dreary, unfair place that would be better off destroyed, or at least filled with music that expresses the complete futility of existence. Black guys don't listen to Radiohead the way I don't listen to almost all rap.

Thats not fair, I listen to Radiohead and I'm hardly emo, whiny, and melodramatic, and it makes me wonder have you ever even listened to Radiohead? You just stereotyped, way to go.


Don't worry, I saw Lord of the Rings. I'm not going to end this 17 times.

reply

ok because the difference from mexicans and peurto ricans is *beep* huge with them both coming from native central americans and the spanish. the only difference is cultural and its not that big a difference, and yes i forgot a little bit, *beep* yourself. or else they are missing my dumb ass? what the *beep* does that *beep* even mean.

reply

You're sooo right. There's not that big a difference between Mexicans and Puerto Ricans. Aside from the following:

--Food is different
--Music is different
--Customs are different
--Holidays are different
--History is different
--Indigenous populations are different
--Climate is different--one's desert-y and attached to the southwest U.S., the other's a tropical island in the Caribbean
--There are language differences--yes, both speak Spanish, but there are words and phrases that are very much not common to both and to a Puerto Rican, some Mexican words and phrases are very foreign and vice versa, I'm sure.
--The accents are different
--In addition, from Wikipedia (yes, I know, but this doesn't seem to be in dispute there so far):

"Puerto Rican culture is a mix of four cultures, African (from the slaves), Taíno (Amerindians), Spanish, and more recently, North American."

The genetic breakdown gets rather convoluted due to all the people who visited/moved to the island.

The Tainos are believed to have been from the West Indies. BTW, they were also made slaves by the Spaniards.

Notice, no Mayans or Aztecs, etc. The Tainos are believed to have been from the West Indies.

I won't even get into politics, as that gets rather involved, other than Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens--many people seem to forget or be unaware of that fact.


You're right, there are hardly any differences between the two.

Disclaimer: if it appeared that there was a bit of a Puerto Rican slant to this list, it's because I'm Puerto Rican and not Mexican, though I could hardly tell the difference either way, right? I'm not, however, trying to suggest that one is better than the other. Just pointing out the teeny, tiny, insignificant differences between the two. Don't get me started on Cubans, Dominicans, Spaniards, Guatemalans...

reply

[deleted]

Do you think the average white American knows the difference between a Mexican, a Cuban, a Puerto Rican or someone from South America?

reply

I'm Irish and Italian and I figured they were Puerto Rican. Can the average American of any color tell the difference between a Pole and a Czech or a Swede and a Norwegian or an Welshman and a Scot? Can Most people from anywhere tell the difference between an American and a Canadian?

reply

The subway was realistic, she was really close to them, and prepared to shoot as well. But the fact that she managed to shoot a moving target who was behind glass and almost completely obscured so severely that he completely lost control of the car and at the same time trying to push the girl out of the way seems a bit far fetched.

I have never known a black person to act so ludicrously "gangsta", and I went to a high school that was about 45-35-15-5 (white, black, Hispanic, Asian) and the people who acted that stereotypically were usually white suburbanites who had never even taken public transportation, never mind a subway train late at night.

I personally believe that the racism of the Hispanic characters comes not just from their depiction, which was quite stereotypical, but from their lack of depth. Here they were, people who managed to totally ruin this woman's life, and the filmmakers made them one-dimensional villains; if they had had mustaches, they would've twisted them evilly. They make them just "bad guy 1" and "bad guy 2"; there is literally zero characterization. The director doesn't even bother to make a point about the crime being tragically random or pointless. It happens in the first fifteen minutes and no more is said about it. I realize that it is a film about Erica and her coping process, but I think a great deal more depth could've been given to her character if they had spent more time on the nature of the crime and all the people involved, especially when the climax of the film and the closure she gained came from going after the guys who personally hurt her and made her what she was.

reply

don't think many black guys listen to Radiohead; it's not a racist thing to say, but they simply don't fit the major demographic, which is mainly composed of whiny, emo, melodramatic white teenage boys who feel that the whole world is a dreary, unfair place that would be better off destroyed, or at least filled with music that expresses the complete futility of existence. Black guys don't listen to Radiohead the way I don't listen to almost all rap.

did not know you took a poll of black men to know what they listen to , dumbass

reply

Just because you disagree with someone or believe them to be wrong doesn't make them a dumbass. And no, I didn't take a poll. Quite simply, black people don't fit the target audience that the record company and MTV try to reach with Radiohead. I didn't say that there has never been a black person who has ever listened to and enjoyed Radiohead. I said they don't fit the major demographic of Radiohead enthusiasts, which is true.

reply

you know , i apologize for calling you a dumbass . should not of said that to you

reply

OP Xcard: Maybe or maybe not a dumbass, but a few coins short of the right change for sure.

It's a frackin' movie - get a life FFS.
You're probably the sort of person who would claim that the Death Star would only rotate like it does if it were controled by a Unix based opperating system which you noted, they didn't seem to have.

Mmm Xcard, Tell you what, why don't you pop down to some project housing areas in the 5 disricts, round up 100 African American males between the ages of 17 - 23 and get back to us with the results of a simple survey: How many of them & how much did they pay, for 'In Rainbows'

reply

Oh my freaking g*d.

Would it have made you, those screaming racism, would it had made you all happy if every single bloody person, ALL OF THEM, all those in the crime scenes as well if they were all white? Yeah that would be realistic wouldn't it in the most multicultural city in the world.

Everyone is always screaming racism this racism that, no one is ever stinking happy has to blame something else.

As for the black people and Radiohead, well then Howard's character Mercer is a racist cop because with Katt's character is running down the list of names on the iPod, Mercer makes a comment about Wu-Tang Clan. So what is he a racist too for basically saying black guys only listen to Wu-Tang Clan.

Give the racist crap a break it is so old.

reply

It also called 'cross cultural communictions' too. All races have different cultures including music and thats a fact. Of course there are exceptions to sterotypes, but I would think that black cultures do not listen to Radiohead, and a good detective would notice this piece of evidence, of course its not hard evidence, but a good lead to start the investigation ...

reply

[deleted]

Way to completely misrepresent Radiohead fans.

reply

What the heck is "Radiohead"?

reply

Its a rock band. They are English, I believe.
They are probably most famous for their song "creep" but they have some other really good songs too.

Ever hear of Me and This Army?
They are a rap group, and the like Radiohead too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnIM3U47pVc

Although I wouldn't classify them as Emo I can say that Radiohead isn't necessarily for everyone.



There is no flavor text!

reply

What is a "cholo"? Is that a type of burrito or something?

reply

"It would be one thing if they showed her transform into a true monster, an emotionless, soulless killer who did so methodically and with a sense of purpose."

You might like 'Ms.45' It's a classic I tell ya.'

reply

unfair portrayal of NYC?. wait until night, then start walking thru the lower or upper part of the island, with jewelry and ipod

reply

I've lived in the East Village all my life and although, NYC is the safest big city in the US, I don't think characters portrayed were stereotypical at all. In fact, if they weren't portrayed they way they were, I would have thought it unrealistic. Of course, everyone is not the same. Most NY'ers are great folks, but there is bad element here too like everywhere else and the movie wanted to show the bad element. I'm not sure what the OP was expecting.

reply

I actually thought they did a fairly decent job of presenting an even-handed variety of ethnicities in both positive and negative lights.
Black detective/Black thugs/Black attorney/Black helpful concerned neighbor/Black prostitute.
White murderers and abusers/White victims/White witness/White cops and detectives.
Asian crime victim/Asian black market gun seller.
The same with Hispanic characters, medical personnel, bystanders, etc.

As tmontyb said, I'm not sure what the OP was expecting, either. And movies have pretty much always utilized stereotypes and broadly-drawn characters to get an idea across in a short amount of time.

I would agree if all of the bad/good lined up consistently along strictly racial lines, but I think they took some care to 'mix it up' in this case. And as a small point, the white middle-aged blonde blue-eyed professional woman was not a heroic figure at all...she was a psychologically ruined killer who was out of control and suicidal.

reply

They left out the Arabs, Eskimos, and Native Americans. I call racism.

reply

HAHA! And I didn't see any Italians so I'm going to play the race card too!

reply

Yeah ok she goes to the part of the Upper East Side where it's known for being full of Mexicans lmao.

reply

I co sign with the OP this movie reeks of misandry and racism. Of course the men of colour are depicted as evil and white women are once again placed as victims in the film.It is interesting because white feminists scream and yell when white women are stereotyped in movies. Yet this movie is obviously anti male it is just plain disgusting and cannot be taken seriously.

reply

Would you apply your theory of alleged misandry and racism to the portrayals of Erica's East Indian fiance, David and the Black detective Mercer and Black neighbor who befriended her in her misery and desperation? Or do you only select the negative or violent characters of color whom you can force fit into your scheme of things?
Your blanket statement that "Of course the men of colour are depicted as evil and white women are once again placed as victims in the film." is easily refuted. There was only one white woman victim who later became the worst kind of perpetrator of unreasoned murder. As far as the male characters...I wonder if you have very selective memory or you just didn't see the film.

reply

Mercer was the main good guy (outside of Jodie) and one of the few good cops (or at least the one of the few shown actually doing their job with some sort of zeal) and he was "of color."

I also notice that people don't want to piss and moan about the extremely negative view of police officers. I know you all probably think that it is cool and "in the right" to point out that cops are lazy, cruel and don't care like the receptionist in the precint. However, outside of the one or two you see on the news acting like jack-asses, these men and women put their life on the line to help us, and we throw them under the bus repeatedly to serve a story-line. I think that was far far more blantant and so much more negative than any racial undertones this movie protrayed.

And if you have a negative view of cops because one pulled you over going ten over the speed limit because (you think) he had to fill a quota, go whine somewhere else. I'm not interested. The only people who hate cops are those who break the law, and in-turn have multiple run-ins with them.

reply

Pray tell who usually assaults and rapes women they don't know.

It sure isn't women and it's disproportionately not white males.

White males get drunk and shoot their girlfriend.

Street rapists and muggers in cities are nearly always minority.

The stats don't lie.

Since when can we not make movies anymore that offend simply by portraying the obvious.

reply

"There is nothing racist about this film. This is who commits most of the crime in large urban areas like it or not.

It ain't hillbillies..lol

It was refreshing, so unpolitically correct for a change. Someone fights back."


Refreshing? So this is the first time you've seen a movie with minorities committing crimes and someone fighting back? What country did you come from lol.


"Street rapists and muggers in cities are nearly always minority.

The stats don't lie."


Yeah and the fact that you said that sounds like you're racist. The stats don't lie.

reply

Hollywood and race baiters like yourself can't stand the heat can you?

Must suck to be the victim generation after generation after generation.

reply

"Of course the men of colour are depicted as evil and white women are once again placed as victims in the film."

Yeah, like Howard's character and the man on the train with the kid... Evil incarnate!

I've lived in NY all my life. It was a slice of life. This story just happened to be about a white woman victim. Oh, and Foster's boyfriend... He wasn't a white man. Then again the whole Asian doctor thing...that could be perceived as sterotypical, lol. And I couldn't help but notice the thing with the Latina caller.

Overall, it's a movie. I found it entertaining. It served its purpose.



"The world was not READY for Big Audio Dynamite!"

R.I.P. Ledgend

reply

"Of course the men of colour are depicted as evil and white women are once again placed as victims in the film."

Are you sure you saw this movie? Terrence Howard certainly wasn't evil, nor were the other cops "of color". Chloe certainly wasn't white and she was one of the victims.

Life, every now and then, behaves as though it had seen too many bad movies

reply

I guess you missed the part where the black cop helps her out at the end or the fact her fiance was not white. It's people like you who make any excuse as to why something is racist that have blurred the lines on what is truly racism.

reply

I'm sick of this "learning to use the gun" crap.

I see people every day who buy a gun, get lessons and can shoot and hit what they are aiming at the first try, before anything is learned from the lesson.

Get a clue, guns are not hard to use.

reply

Hey genius,

The black guys didn't listen to radiohead - they STOLE the mp3 player from the white kid who was listening to radiohead.

And there were no stereotypes in this film, only things you'd normally see in a big city. The black kids on the bus was not over done by any means. Even where I live, black kids on buses make a point of being loud and acting menacingly.

reply

The OP is objecting to the cop's stereotype-based remark "Radiohead? I'm guessing this wasn't his iPod" (I'm quoting from memory, but that's the gist of the line).

reply

by - XcardfiendX on Sat Feb 9 2008 22:05:39
- Black guys dont listen to radiohead!

---------------------------------------
but someone might steal an iPod regardless of what was on it. dude, your comment is hilarious...actually more-so a stupid statement.

reply

I was referring to when the detective saw radiohead on the Ipod on the black guys dead body and said "I don't think this is his!"

Genius.

Also, maybe its just me, but I felt as if the makers of this film felt it might be deemed somewhat racist, so they added in random "good" minority characters to try to even it out and make it seem more like "New York." (old black guy on the bus, Jodie's fiance)Also, making Jodie's character not seem racist by having her fiance be non-white. (after all, most of the dudes she kills in the film are minorities.)

reply

[deleted]

XcardfiendX: I was referring to when the detective saw radiohead on the Ipod on the black guys dead body and said "I don't think this is his!"

-------------------------------
I didn't read your original post that way, but now that you cleared it up, i see your point. Also, your other points in the above post are reasonable.

reply

Im black and noted the ethnic stereotypes but didnt think the film was being racist, I just felt it seemed a bit ermm to obvious to be true, as in it was a bit lazy in how they depicted the minority thugs. Someone else has said it more eloquently as in the Latinos just seemed to be bad guy1 etc, but other from noticing it I wasn't really offended readin this thread definitely has killed any anger I may have felt, know I just cant be bothered.

Also with the radiohead thing, come on black people just tend not to listen to them, I like to think I know about other types of music but apart from creep I couldn't tell you the name of any of their songs and I first heard of that song because there was a hip hop remake a few years ago. Not only that the guys werent just black they were dressed head to toe in 'hip hop' attire so yes it would be unlikely that they listen to radiohead, It would be like a punk listening to Britney spears.

reply

The first of Erica's victims was a guy who had just killed his wife. He looked pretty Anglo to me. Is that feminest?
Given the same experience level, which was NONE, woman with a gun is more dangerous than a man with a gun.
Hitting a human in the torso from 10 feet away with a gun is easy. Killing them with one or even 6 shots is hard. The younger and stronger the target is also increases the survival rate. One or both of the cats on the subway would have survived, more than likely

reply