The difference between you and I is that I need evidence. Theories, hearsay, opinions, conjecture, and outright lies (http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/hoax.html) are not evidence.
It's funny how you never addressed any of my other comments in that post, except for that one comment. von Kleist mentioned how you can watch frame by frame of the "explosion" upon impact, from your own home, if you have a copy of the plane hitting. I did, and after I looked at it frame by frame, it wasn't altered. This author of the site that you listed is using HEARSAY, claiming that "people" who talked to von Kleist said that he made certain remarks. I'm not using hearsay. If there is a witness who describes what he saw, that is not hearsay. Your example proved my point of how you're a hypocrite, when you tell me that:
Theories, hearsay, opinions, conjecture, and outright lies (http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/hoax.html) are not evidence.
...
...when you did at least several of these things already. The funny thing is that if I direct you toward "9/11 Architects, Pilots, etc... for Truth", you'll tell me that they're not experts, but the typical 9/11 official story believer will ignore experts, because it doesn't go along with their official story theory. So, in essence you consider yourself as being more credible, because you have experts that follow the party line. If these experts that follow the official story, were to change their position, it could possibly be bad for them, as they could be fired or blacklisted. I have a buddy who is a metallurgist for Lockheed-Martin, even tell me that anyone who officially changes their position could be fired or blacklisted, hence why many people remain hush hush about it, or have the position that their company wants them to have. Yet, there are many credible pilots that served commercially, privately, or with the military, that don't share the official position. The same goes for firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, media professionals, medical professionals, political leaders, religious leaders, scholars, and scientists...hence why each have their own groups trying to have the investigation reopened. So, you're telling me that these individuals, many of which have hands on experience in their fields, are dead wrong, but YOU are right, because you follow the official position, and the story they give you?
By the way, von Kleist made a documentary in 2007 where he made his point clear, and went in a more detailed direction. He has never claimed to be a "know it all", he has only tried to display the evidence, and asked people to think. If Dave was wrong about a certain detail, he certainly would have corrected in by that time, especially since the details released to the public in 2004 and 2007 were different, in terms of how much info was released, and info that was clarified. Hell, in 2004, there was still much confusion about what info was correct, or just a mis-clarification, because it was only 3 years after the event.
You have to wonder why many people who had much experience in their fields, whether it was a MS, PhD, commercial/military pilot, people who served in intelligence fields (Army, Navy, CIA, NSA, Naval Intelligence, etc...), various architects and engineers, etc... would be a part of these groups, especially with all of their experiences in their fields? But, according to you, all of these people are wrong, and you are right.
Here's the part where you make some minute statement about something that has little, if anything to do with anything. You'll just say that I'm wrong, you're right, and you'll be vague about the details of the side that you have. You'll say that my point of view is simply a conspiracy theory, not a conspiracy. You'll say that all of these people that have experience in their respective fields that formed such and such "for 9/11 truth" are full of crap, and yet you're not. Basically, your tactic with be debating by discrediting the opposition. What I've found is that people I know that are pilots, scientists/researchers, architects/engineers, etc... don't speak up because of one of two things: 1. They don't want to lose their jobs or get blacklisted, so they keep their mouths shut. OR 2. They haven't done any research of the official story or the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11, so they believe the official story, because they haven't done in depth research, because they have had no reason to. There is actually a third reason, and that is: People don't want to think that their government, or people within the government could be that evil, so they would rather be in a state of denial. Believe me, I don't "get off" on conspiracy theories. I find them intriguing, but I'd rather have them be not true, than find out that there is truth in various conspiracy theories. Something I learned is: Don't trust your government. You see enough politicians lie through their teeth, and get paid off by lobbyists, so why wouldn't our Heads of State be any different? The government will lie and do covert acts to accomplish what it wants(WMD's, Watergate, Bay of Pigs, etc...). They would rather you be spoonfed information by them/media, than to do your own research.
"Every time there is a bang, the world's a wanker short." -Billy Connolly
reply
share