MovieChat Forums > Peaceful Warrior (2006) Discussion > Would you choose to work with a convicte...

Would you choose to work with a convicted peadophile?!


I watched this film completely unaware of the director's past. It was an ok film, the 'Rocky' training montage was ridiculous, but the rest was a midly diverting 100+ minutes.

Then I read about Salva's past on IMDB and I felt sick. Not least because of the amount of people that leapt to the defence of this slimy child molester in the name of 'Art'! Because someone (anyone) makes 'good films' we should divorce ourselves from the fact that this grown man manipulated a 12 year old boy in his employ on one of his films to repeatedly suck his penis while he video taped it?! Because he makes 'good films'?! Is that how it works?! By the same token, if it was your little bother/son/nephew/cousin/friend that he repeatedly debased and dehumanised while in his care you would put that aside as long as the creative content of his 'art' made up for it?!

I'm devasted that my money has helped this man pay his bills! I'm astounded that he is allowed to be in a position to sell anything to the public under the pretention 'I don't like to have sex with little boys'! If you need to eat, go pack boxes!! What also truly baffles me is that this is something that the industry knows about Salva and yet actors like Nick Nolte, Amy Smart, ALL OF THEM, still sign up to help him? Because it doesn't matter? The art it what he does is more important than the little boy he manipulated into performing sex acts with him on camera for his own warped gratification (and who knows who else)?! I wonder if anybody on set allowed their young childre to be around him? The author of this 'inspirational story', HIS story, allows a man who is a known and convicted sexual predator of little boys to bring it to the screen??!!! Am I missing something here?!!

If a man you knew was a convicted peadophile, a man who was a known child predator, offered you a job, would you accept it knowing that all your family, your friends, your peers would know who he is and what he had done? or does it really not matter? help me out here. Peadophiles do not stop being peadophiles when they are caught, they just have to be more discreet and/or more in control of their unnatural urges in the future. I would feel repulsed working looking into the eyes of a man who I knew had only stopped what he had been doing (or maybe just hadn't been caught out again) because he had been caught once already.

reply

Who gives a damn about his past, it has no bearing on his ability to make a movie, which quite honestly is all I want from a director.

If a man you knew was a convicted paedophile, a man who was a known child predator, offered you a job, would you accept it
If I wanted the Job, then yes, I most certainly would. I haven't done anything wrong, why should I suffer for the sake of someones else's psychological sexual perversion?

"I didn't earn celebratory fondue!"

reply

Just do what I do and pirate his work.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Mighty Alz, I've read some of your posts, and while I don't necessarily agree with them, you raise some interesting points. Your description or certain acts that are now considered Taboo but were quite common-place years ago is why I think approaching this as a legal issue is off the mark.

From a legal standpoint, it's cut and dried. Salva was convicted, served his time, case-closed. The problem most people have with this is that we our Society is governed by a Court of Law, but not necessarily a Court of Justice. True justice would have the perpetrator serving an amount of time equal to his victim's suffering - both physical and emotionally. Fortunately I have never been the victim of molestation, but I can't imagine a child is going to recover from this trauma in a year or two, which is the sentence many of these Pedophiles receive. So yes, legally speaking, Salva and others have served their time and paid their debt to society. The bigger issue is that the debt Society asks them to pay is considered quite lenient by the majority of people on this thread.

I'd like to ask you a question Mighty Alz, not to make a point, but because I'm genuinely interested to hear your thoughts. Let's take the law out of it. Let's say that it was perfectly legal for a grown man to have sex with a young boy. My question to you is, given that situation, if a 30 year old man has sex with a 5 year old boy, has the 30 year-old done anything wrong?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Depends on the job offered.

You are overly concerned about this guy.

reply