God, that was condescending.
Aside from the obvious lack of capitalisation, I think her arguments are mostly pretty valid. She shares an anecdote about her behaviour at a younger age being influenced by the media, and compares it to the dolls and today's clothing. She explains her impressions of a commercial on the dolls (see, she's done more research than I have) - and what she thinks its effects on the target population (i.e. kids, girls in particular) are. She links it back to people her own age, and then goes to the media's portrayal of teenagers, which she finds unrealistic. Not including: her screen name, eagerness to get into the argument, "I pity this girl", "So there," and "It's true. I watch scientific documentaries." I see nothing that's got much omnipotence to it. The essence of her argument is laid out well and logically. You say "they're not gonna go off and have sex with every guy that they see." Yeah, I agree; that's a pretty extreme statement. Where did Jessi imply as such?
If I may, I think you also overreacted to "throw away." That could mean any number of things. Me, I'd always return things - or donate them to charity - if I received them as gifts and didn't want them. And I'd also use the words "throw away" if I were writing about it - because those are the strongest words for it, those that emphasise the action the most.
Expletives, even covered up, aren't going to help anyone either.
I realise I'm probably overreacting to your post, but whatever. Maybe I feel like arguing too.
reply
share