[Rant] Inconsistencies and stupidities made me reconsider this movie
OK. Let me make a little confession. First time I watched it, I liked the movie. So maybe I wasn't too bright. But after reading around a bit, I agree with most of the posters, the plot holes, inconsistencies, plain stupidities made me reconsider my feelings toward this movie. This is a good story done in a very bad manner. Great concept, lousy execution. I don't just want emotions and character development (which is done incorrectly either), I want a REAL PLOT that is believable.
Here are the list of things that made me reconsider:
1) THE CAPTORS DOESN'T SEEM TO WANT TO PACIFY WADE AT ALL
They handcuffs this man hands at the front of his body, not the back. This is plain stupid. We have a man who is an infamous bandit. He robbed 21 coaches and killed lots of people. And you cuff his hands at the front so he can kill people, take a gun and aim them. There are **hundreds** of ways to pacify this guy. How stupid were the captors?
- Handcuff his hands on the back. Have him tied to the horse (face down, tummy to the saddle) and have one man take the horse with him (while also riding a horse).
- Blindfold him.
- Gag his mouth so he wouldn't speak.
After he KILLED one of the captors, are we to believe that the sheriffs at the wild west era are pansies that just hit him?
- Shoot off his fingers
- Shoot off one of his leg
- Again, cuff this guy on the back
We are to believe that law enforcement people that are SMART enough to make a stagecoach bait are not smart enough to cuff this guys hand at the back. Heck, tie ropes all around him and his legs for that matter.
2) WE HAVE A MAN WHO IS MOST DEFINITELY WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE. YES, LET'S TAKE HIM TO YUMA WHERE THERE IS GREAT CHANCE THAT HE WILL ESCAPE AND WE WILL GET KILLED BY THE BANDITS. NO DON'T KILL HIM HERE AND NOW.
We are to believe that law enforcement at wild west are all corrupt, yet one of them believes in court and the law so strongly that he doesn't execute a man on the spot. It's like the law enforcement are all modern politically correct liberal lefties somehow transported to the wild west by some time machine (no wonder all of them are pansies and can't hold a gun, let alone aim them).
At one point, the *beep* law enforcer (that burned the barn) once said 'I say we shoot him right here right now' - NO REPLIES. Yes. That's right, THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO KILL HIM RIGHT THERE RIGHT NOW.
Remember. *This* *is* *the* *wild* *west*. Ever heard of the term 'Wanted dead or alive'?
3) WE OFFER $200 DOLLARS FOR EVERYBODY THAT KILLS A LAW ENFORCEMENT GUARD. YES, $200 FOR ALL OF YOU TO BE AN OUTLAW. AND THE WHOLE CITY FALLS FOR IT (30-40 PEOPLE)
*This* *is* *the* *wild* *west*. And this is the south. Citizens have guns. They loath bandits. It wasn't a small, obscure pirate's cove. It's an effing budding town with railroads. In a time and place where citizens have to fend for themselves against bandits, the whole town chooses to be an accessory to the crime, support the bandits and kill the sheriffs. I agree with they guy that said it, this is like osama bin laden offering 30,000-100,000 dollars to new york citizens to kill a cop - GUARDING AN EFFING TERRORIST.
I'll say no more and quote this amzing post by 32Ford:
You forgot to mention the dumbest part. We are supposed to believe a gang of 7 o outlaws with prices on their heads can ride into a town and sit around in the open on their horses and threaten the town Marshall? In the real west it would have taken about 3 minutes for the towns people to shoot them off their horses and then pose smiling for photos with the bodies while they wait for the reward money to come rolling in.
On top of that,we are supposed to believe one of the gang can shout out to the town that he will pay anybody 200 dollars each for each of the guards they murder,and the people in the town start grabbing their guns to go shoot the deputies and Marshall?
I am a BIG fan of Elmore Leonard,but if he wrote this script he had to have been smoking some super weed when he wrote it because it may be the dumbest damn thing I have ever seen.
4) WE HAVE 7 - YES -SEVEN PEOPLE DOWN BELOW, OMG WE ARE SO AFRAID. SO LET THE BANDIT GO OUT AND SPEAK TO THEM - THE MOST STUPID THING EVER IMAGINED. OH YES, AND DON'T SHOOT THE BANDITS BELOW EITHER.
How many IQs do you have to have, that you keep your prisoner's mouth stuffed rather than let him talk to his homeboys? They don't effing know for sure that he's at the motel for crying out loud.
Have you ever realized why the 7 guys waited instead of just storming inside?
1. The law enforcement guy have height and cover.
2. They are afraid of shooting because they might shoot their boss that they're trying to save. Why do you think they sit down and wait instead of going in?
And the seven guys there, in plain sight, the guys could have separated to different rooms with different vantage points, and starts shooting the below. In *the* *wild* *west* the marshal surrenders. Pathetic. You don't get to be marshals for being pansies, you get to be marshals for being tough.
5) LAW ENFORCEMENT CAN'T SHOOT.
Look, I know bandits at the *wild* *west* are tough. Marshals and sheriffs and bounty hunters and yes, even regular citizens, they are all tough too. In this movie, only bandits can shoot. The others are either afraid of shooting or have allergies with guns. Remember the holdup at the hotel. *No* *bullets* *fired*.
---
Now, the movie has an interesting concept - that the honest-to-the-core bale character could affect wade and his worldview, that they grow together as a character - but it was crudely made. If there was a change of heart in wade's character, it wasn't shown in words, expressions, or any kind of body language. Wade in this movie, let me stress this, is CONSTANTLY CONSISTENT. That's what made the sudden change of heart in the end quite unbelievable.
Many posters made interesting theories on how bale-character influence wade. I appreciate that, it shows some depth in the concept, however it's just not well made. It made this movie a disappointment.
/end rant