MovieChat Forums > Bukowski: Born into This (2004) Discussion > Bono the only inappropriate inclusion he...

Bono the only inappropriate inclusion here


The only completely inappropriate inclusion in this movie was U2's Bono. I can believe that Bukowski went to -- and even danced at -- a U2 concert; he drank a lot. But what I can't imagine is that he ever gave could have stomached someone as pretentious, egotistical and manufactured as Bono. I guess Bono's star power was a draw for the film, but for me it turned what could have been a great film into a merely good one. I don't get Bono as he comes out to pay tribute to some truly inspiring artists, Johnny Cash being another, while his artistic contributions are completely out of proportion with his "legendary" status.

I would like to see this movie again with his bits edited out. I'm sure it would make for a cohesive flow and be more in the spirit of its subject.

reply

"someone as pretentious, egotistical and manufactured as Bono"

a lot of people seem to believe bono to be those things and i could certainly understand where this is rooted. however, i think this is a media perspective and sort of gloss labeling. i think if people who thought this about bono may not have invested time or energy (understandably, rightfully so; bono/u2 is not for everyone) into other shades of the man. for instance, in jann wenner's 2005 interview, the book "u2 by u2" and etc. one could see a bono who indeeds understands the pretentious, egotistical and manufactured tendencies in himself but one could also experience the doubt, humility and vulnerability as well. bono is fallible and flawed but also someone who seems to want some truth and exploration as well. i think he is admittedly self-conscious and insecure as the next person, not alone, public figure.

i think the fact bono was moved and lit up by buk's work lends credence to the fact that buk was painting with a broad brush and could seep into anyone's work. yes, the bono of the past 20 years seem incongruous to bukowski''s work. but bono as a boy/man in dublin and in the early years of u2 is consistent to buk if you were to look into it.


reply

sfdersh-1, are you actually Bono?? the thought of Bono in a Bukowski doco did rankle me at first but i did find his contribution interesting and thoughtful. though maybe he tried a tad too hard to be making quotable observations. I can forgive Bono's egomania as I'm sure the constant adoration of him and his kind makes someone prone to this condition.

reply

Bukowski called Bono a "millionaire rock-star, a part of the establishment regardless of what he says".
Of course, I'm getting this from Wikipedia, so who knows how accurate that is...

"The Losers Club"
Pennywise Lives

reply

Bono is a fraud and a prick. Did anyone notice how hard he was trying to read that poem? The camera obviously cut out somewhere in the middle, I bet he made them record that ten times. No one else in the doc tried to read his poetry with that phony sense of emotion because no one else was an egotistical bitch worried more about their own image in the film than talking about Bukowski. *beep* Bono.

reply

[deleted]

I was rolling along, totally engrossed, and then....Sean Penn. Sean *beep* Penn? How in the *beep* did Jeff Spicoli become friends with Bukowski? Of course he would call him from Bono's castle in Dublin. Bono and Penn are the ultimate "in-crowd" A-holes that wouldn't have any trouble at all getting to the front of the line anywhere, anytime. Wow, they sure are cool, to be friends with such a pock marked hunch back after he becomes de rigueur. I actually never disliked either of them until they lent themselves to this documentary. I know that using de rigueur in writing is pretentious but its OK, when I used to hang out with Ghandi and John Lennon they said its better than name dropping horse sh*t.

reply

I might be one of the few who wasn't offended by Bono's appearance. Lots of people like to pay homage to Bukowski...many of them famous. Bono seemed sincere and a genuine fan of the man.

His appearance was certainly nowhere as sycophant-like as Johnny Depp's in the documentary about Ralph Steadman.

reply

Oh what fun it is to trash-talk the wealthy eccentrics of our time!

Bono is a famous performing artist and admires Bukowski. His presence in the film is appropriate. Penn's too.

I am neither Bono nor Bono adjacent. I liked there stuff through Joshua Tree and a few of their songs after but what I like most about Bono is he's really tried to make a difference in the world. It may in fact be ego that makes a person think they CAN make a difference so I say, vive la ego!

Now, how can I get a copy of the biopic with James Franco? James, frankly, should be e-mailing me regularly. I know a lot about things he's looking into.

Okay, enough wine. Stop picking on that Irish guy.

Love is like breathing. You have to take some in and let it out to live.

reply

Very well said.

One thing I've noticed about Bono from interviews is he loves artists who go against the grain. Bukowski would be one such example.

Say what you want about Bono but "insincere" doesn't seem to be one of them.




"This is dead air, Barry....dead air."

reply

Bono was always a bit of a sod. At least it's not an act.

reply