MovieChat Forums > Being Julia (2005) Discussion > The essence of the book was completely l...

The essence of the book was completely left out in the film



The film doesn't make justice to the novel at all.
Julia's character does not have the same complexity as it does in the novel.
Many key moments in the her relationship with Tom are concentrated into small scenes that make her seem too wick and not too clever either.
She is in fact a double persona, the one she lets other people see and the one she really is.
Also, the most important scene in the hole novel and for me personally ( her discussion with Roger after his return from Viena, where he tells her the most infuriating truth about herself, which is that she in fact had no personality of her own, that she was the sum of all her roles and that she only played the role of a loving and caring mother, the role of a great actress, the role of a faithful and devoted wife, etc and that many times he was wondering "When I've seen you go into an empty room I've sometimes wanted to open the door suddenly, but I've been afraid to in case I found nobody there."





The function of art is not to serve as example, but to harrow his soul.

reply

Hmmm, the novel does seem different from the movie, thanks for the info. I just bought the DVD yesterday. Now I'd like to pick up the book too. Seems as though there is much more detail into their characters.Thanks

reply

>She is in fact a double persona, the one she lets other people see and the one she really is.

Yeah, that kind of showed when she used the same "You are the only one I can be myself with" speech to Lord Charles and then later to Tom, pretty much word for word.

Later, at a meal with just her son, he explains this characteristic about her, in case we didn't pick it up ourselves.

At the same time, I'm sure the book went into it in much more detail, from what you're saying.

reply

Actually it was Naples.

Typical of a film not to be able to capture all the nuance of a novel.

reply