Here's what happened


About 15 minutes in, Sarah has arrived in the house and has settled in. She's in front of her computer with a blank page in front of her. She has told John that she wants to try writing a new story in a new genre, but she doesn't know where to start. She is looking for inspiration. She glances over at the nearby dresser and notices an egg-shaped object on top of it. This gets her thinking about what kind of person might have such an object. John had mentioned his daughter. This gets Sarah thinking about what John's daughter might be like. Everything after that is part of the story in her new book.

She creates the visit from John's daughter, changing one letter in her name so she can publish the book. She makes Julia sexually active and hints that John has orgies to add sex appeal to her book. She has already met Franck and Marcel, so she adds them to the story. The other men, who Julia sleeps with, don't require names. The swimming pool features as one of the main settings for her book because it's right outside her window as she types. She throws in the little person and the mystery about the mother to add drama. John is not necessary to the book, so Sarah cannot reach him by phone (and he doesn't return calls).

The final scene is a return to "real life": Sarah's book does include a murder but is not a murder mystery or detective story. It's more about the gap between young / old, free / repressed sexuality, French / British values etc., so John is not interested. She tells John, "Keep the book. Give it to your daughter. I've signed it for her. Ciao.". This is because Sarah's dreaming about what John's daughter might be like was the inspiration for her book. She passes by John's real daughter but of course she doesn't recognize Sarah. No-one was actually killed, so Sarah is not worried about the police. The final scene is Sarah gazing on the reality behind the inspiration for her book.

reply

Thank you

reply

But is it me or in the ending she waves at two different girls? i dont *beep* get that

reply

They did that just for the audience. They showed us the girl that Sarah was imagining the whole time. A throwback sort of.

---

reply

I like this explanation, thanks.

reply

That sounds spot on, thanks for clearing up my questions!


reply

That's pretty much the way I read it: the unblocking of a writer's block.🐭

reply

I like the explanation but I don't get a few things. When Sarah tells John that she already knew he wouldn't be interested in the book and shows the book already published by other editor, he asks "Why couldn't you have told me?" and she replies "There are a few things that you couldn't tell me", like this was a payback.
And before that she mocks him asking if she should burn the book because he didn't like it, just like (according to Julie) Julie's mother did when he disapproved her book.
If the whole Julie experience only existed in her mind, why was Sarah throwing these things at John's face?

reply

"There are a few things you couldn't tell me"

Like, for example, that he never intended on joining her in France, that he didn't share the same feelings for her, etc.

As far as the book burning, she knew him so well that she would know his feelings about the book, and that is why she incorporated that part in her book. In other words, she knew that about him first, put it in her book, then told him to his face at the end of the film, gloating at how well she knew him.

reply

You know, I watched this film last night for the first time in several years and it struck me differently. I think the points you raise have merit. I was so convinced in the interpretation that "the whole film is a projection of the novel Sarah is writing" that I forced every line into that interpretation. But after another viewing, well, I still think we are seeing her projections to a point, but other things suggest a level or reality that I dismissed before.

Take the shot where the camera pans along Julies body and then Franck. That shot appears abruptly out of nowhere -- with no context -- then cuts to a shot of Sarah waking up. So the scene was clearly a dream she was having. Did it stoke her imagination and put her on the path to the new novel? Either way, it was clearly a scene not to be interpreted literally.

Or take the shot of the "real" Julia at the end of the film. She is dressed just like Julie, so that implies (to me) that Sarah was familiar with Julia (and how she dressed) so clearly the Julie we watched throughout the film was one and the same (throw in the more obvious closing scene and that solidifies the notion). But again, if the Julie we've seen throughout the film wasn't real, or the story (whichever variation) about her mother, what could her question to John have meant? The question -- along with the book burning reference -- seem to be rooted in a level of reality, otherwise it makes little sense.

Unless Sarah is just nuts and her publicist is aware of that. And if that were true, how could such a person function in life so successfully? And so on . . .

I'll have to plan to watch it again in a couple of months. I'm sure I'll change my mind about something else

As for Julie being real or not. It can be argued either way, and many have. I think it's one of those films that will have me leaning one way then the other every time I see it.

reply

"What about Julie's mom's manuscript, supposedly burnt up by evil John but suddenly appearing, rescued by Julie after all? It's just a Gothic tease; we never even find out what's in it, let alone why John tried to burn it, or how Sarah uses it in her own work (although we see her apparently doing so). The half-baked, careless inventiveness is all part of Sarah's creative process, and part of the joke on John."

http://suzymckeecharnas.com/essays/the-deep-end-of-swimming-pool.htm#:~:text=He%20says%20his%20movie%20is,self%20into%20renewed%20creative%20energy.

reply

I just think that François Ozon likes to see hot girls in his movies, not only 'daughters'. All story has been created for those hot scenes with Ludivine Sagnier. And 'blah-blah-blah mystery' added to swindle us.

reply

Agree. There are a lot of clues. John says the house is empty, daughter isn't there, it's off season. When she arrives the pool is full of leaves and has the cover on it. The swimming scenes it's summer and the pool is clean, etc etc. It was all her imagination. Even the deleted scenes show Sarah walking around examining the areas surrounding the property, coming up w/details within. The two men (Franck and the other French guy) at the pool are even wearing the same briefs.

reply