MovieChat Forums > Swimming Pool (2003) Discussion > Is all the sex and nudity necessary?

Is all the sex and nudity necessary?

posted 13 years ago by lazyjulie
24 replies | jump to latest

I mean in my opinion if there is less sex and nudity, this movie will be much better. But you can be entitled to your opinion.

[–] GamblinMike 11 years ago

Typical question. I have a better question. Is all the violence on television not including the news necessary?

[–] lazarillo 11 years ago

It's an erotic mystery--they had to put some sex in it. Why do they put so many horses in Westerns? Why do they put so many children in children's movie? Why do they put so many explosions in action movies?

I'm sorry but I just can't complain about seeing Ludivine Sagnier or even Charlotte Rampling naked. You may as well complain about the beautiful cinematography or the great editing.

[–] eolloe 8 years ago

Is all the sex and nudity necessary?

Yes.

[–] gluserty 8 years ago

I thought it was apt for the subject matter of the film. Besides, Charlotte Rampling has been a part of many racy films throughout her career, so I'm not surprised at all that she's in the lead here.

[–] AlBFine 8 years ago

YES! Ludivine is such a pleasure to look at. Beauty is naked!

[–] RavenGlamDVDCollector 7 years ago

If I looked like Ludivine, I'd be naked in movies too.

;)--8

[–] dralla-1 8 years ago

You didn't enjoy it? o_O