7.0? No. No way. Uh, uh.


Awful Acting. Predictable and Generic Plot. Terrible Script... and Poor Editing.
It's like a 'Low-Budget' flick with money.

How the hell does this movie get a 7.0 Rating?
Furthermore, how the hell did they get Chazz Palminteri & Christopher Walken to agree to perform?
It has to have been a lost bet!

Yes, of course Christopher Walken was great. That don't make it good.
The pilot of the Hindenburg may have done a good job.
Don't make it a good voyage.

4½ at best!

(¯`·._.··¸.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.,-(→_→ (*︶*^*︶*) ←_←)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸··._.·´¯)

SPOILER ALERT!!! Good guy wins/gets girl, a-hole gets kumuppins & I'm out $8

reply

Please go back on your meds before posting again. That hindenburg analogy was not only silly, it doesn't even make sense (the pilot would be the director of the movie, not one of the actors) The less said about the random bolding/italicizing of words the better, and half of your sentences read like a child wrote it ('that don't make it good')

Also what is a 'low budget flick with money' exactly? Like I said, don't forget to take your pills next time...


'Get yourself a real dog. Any dog under 50 lbs is a cat and cats are pointless' - Ron Swanson

reply

Nice comeback!

reply

It's a 10 in my book, the dialog alone gets the movie and 8 for me. Walken and Palminteri make this movie incredible. You missed the F'in signs Triple-xXx.

reply

How the hell does this movie get a 7.0 Rating?


My guess would be because of the numerous sock accounts driving it up.Browse through a few of the posts and try to count them.If you check the posting history of the people attacking posters that didn't care for for the movie you will find that they only posted on this board or the boards of the directors other films.One common theme is,"I love this movie,I've seen it 25 times!".

reply