MovieChat Forums > Andromeda (2000) Discussion > What did Kevin Sorbo do?

What did Kevin Sorbo do?


I'm a fan of Sorbo, but it seems like he burns bridges. He really was kind of unprofessional the way he went public with his disagreements with Rob Tapert on Hercules, especially when he made personal attacks on Lucy Lawless in interviews.

I've heard rumors that the reason one of the main writers of the show got fired after season two of Andromeda was because of Kevin Sorbo. Can a fan give me the whole story? What did Sorbo have to do with it?

PS I never watched the show when it was on. I kind of resented the idea that Sorbo was doing a new series, because I was such a big fan of Hercules. I just started watching the show and I'm on season 4. I'm glad I finally gave it a chance!

"Success is all luck. Just ask any failure."

reply

I read that Sorbo wasn't fond of the serialized writing of the series that was established from the beginning and campaigned to make the show more episodic and more Dylan-centric. As a result, showrunner Robert Hewitt Wolfe was eventually fired and the show quickly went to hell in a handbasket.

I'm Heather Langenkamp's husband in another universe.

reply

I've seen that on message boards. I'd just like to see it from a reputable source with some more info. Oh well.

In fact, Kevin Sorbo, after the fact, has stated that he felt it was a mistake to fire Robert Hewitt Wolfe, like he had no part in it.

Gilles Nuytens: I really enjoyed that movie. It was really entertaining. My next question: did the storylines from ‘Andromeda’, as season one progressed, meet your expectations?

Kevin Sorbo: Yeah. I thought it was fantastic. To cut to the chase, I thought it was a big mistake to get rid of Robert Hewitt Wolfe as our show runner. He made a five year vision for the show and they fired him after two years. That’s kind of the studio’s way to sort of keep people in their place for ego reasons, I don’t know. I was hoping we could see his vision through. I enjoyed the darkness of it, the unpredictability of it, and I enjoyed the universe. Being as evil as it was, I wanted to see how Dylan was going to work his way through with the Magogs and the Nietzscheans, and all the other bad people.
http://www.thescifiworld.net/interviews/kevin_sorbo_01.htm

In any case, I'm on Season 4 and I didn't notice a huge shift in the series after Season 2. I'm still enjoying it. After I finish I'll read the Coda to see the original vision for the show.

Anyway, I get sad when I hear about Sorbo burning bridges. I think he's a good actor and he's a great presence. It's just sad to see that he might have acted like that behind the scenes....

"Success is all luck. Just ask any failure."

reply

http://www.agonybooth.com/tv/Gene_Roddenberrys_Andromeda_Series_Review .aspx

After Andromeda was put out of its misery (and ours), Sorbo changed career directions by starring in Christian-based movies, such as God’s Not Dead. Fine, but what irks me is that he eventually said that removing Wolfe from the show was a mistake, which begs the question of why he championed it so much when it originally occurred. In recent years, Sorbo has also claimed that Hollywood stopped giving him roles because he’s a Christian, and the fact that he’s simply a lousy actor has nothing to do with it.


Read more: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?p=4954573#post49545 73#ixzz3K7sRWyZ9

reply

Fine, but what irks me is that he eventually said that removing Wolfe from the show was a mistake, which begs the question of why he championed it so much when it originally occurred.
I see that, but that's what I'm asking about. I've not seen a legitimate source for this being the case. I've seen claims on message boards, and now one TV series review written recently. But I haven't found any real news reports or statements about it, so I'm just curious as to where this comes from. Has Wolfe ever spoken openly about this and blamed Sorbo?

EDIT: I have found reports that Sorbo was on board with the change at the time it happened. However, dude may have changed his mind in retrospect. Still, I've still seen nothing to suggest that Sorbo was instrumental in that change....

Please stop.

reply

I assume that specialising in Christian Movies is a fairly lucrative niche in America - I have no idea if it reflects any particularly strong belief on his part. Have to say through that the few times I've tried this genre they were unwatchable in terms of script/production values/casting (mostly). Then when I go to the message boards there are heaps of posts praising the film for non-cinematic reasons. Are well, so it goes.

reply

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/TroubledProduction/LiveActionTV

Production on Andromeda had an absolute whale of a time thanks to the antics of lead actor Kevin Sorbo, who demanded that the show focus more and more on him at the expense of his co-stars, as well as executive demands to make the show more episodic and maintain the status quo at all costs. All of these factors led to showrunner Robert Hewitt Wolfe being fired after the end of season two, taking all pretense of character or story development along with him. Wolfe has since written a one-act play, Coda, which is a compressed form of his original plan for the series. Sorbo's antics also put a permanent dent in the actor's career, and he soon descended into religious fundamentalism, being unable to secure roles in anything except direct-to-video and made-for-television productions and Christploitation films such as God's Not Dead and Let There Be Light.

reply

I never watched the show when it was on. I kind of resented the idea that Sorbo was doing a new series, because I was such a big fan of Hercules.

Funny, but I'm the other way around. Because I liked Andromeda, I decided to check out Hercules.

reply

He underestimated the intelligence of the viewers which led to him getting several of the best writers involved fired and then dumbed down the show because we the viewers were too stupid to grasp complex serialized shows.
He also had such overblown ego that he at the same time changed the show so that it was all about his character.

reply

That's the party line for a lot of people on message boards, but I've seen little evidence from legitimate sources that support that.

Please stop.

reply

Basically, he did what he had to do as star of the show. Lead actors often have the "executive producer"-title attached to their contracts, since it allows them better royalties from re-runs.

As leads and exec prods they also have it written in their contracts that they have to act as the public faces of a project, endorsing whatever the main line of the production company is supposed to be at one time or another.

Tribune and several of the writers, including Wolfe as first head writer and many on the original writing staff, had differences, mainly about how ratings started stellar and then dropped continuously for the first year and a half. And since they couldn't meet on eye-level, Tribune fired Wolfe. Sorbo went out and did his job, taking it upon him to explain it to the press and the fans. The fans did not take it kindly.

Then, when the studio did not come up wit a head-writer replacement, a power struggle occurred between one half of Wolfe's writing staff (Kiene / Reinkemeyer) and the other (Stentz / Miller). Stentz / Miller won when Kiene / Reinkemeyer got fed up and left, whiche resulted in the former ones (both convinced Wolfe-afficionados) merrily insisting on fleshing out Wolfe-scripts into existence. Ratings continued to drop. So by the end of season 2 the studio appointed Robert Engels as new head-writer. And Sorbo went out and explained it again all to everyone asking.

Stentz / Miller were first glad about Robert Engels, then not. Over the course of season 3. they delivered very mixed bags of quality - which is understandable, seeing that they were spending most of their time lobbying their and Wolfe's cause with the fans. Engles himself was also delivering mixed bags of quality (even more mixed than S / M), which did not endear him with the fans, since HE was spending most of his time on writing confusing scripts and not communicating with them. While Sorbo went out and explained it all to... WEll, by now you know the drill.

Then Stentz and Miller left with a big and very vocal bang, complaining to the fans on how Sorbo had not fought for their cause with the studio, with Engels, publicly, etc. (In their heart of hearts they probably believed Sorbo was really Dylan Hunt.) And Sorbo went out... and so on and so forth.

In short: Sorbo became the spokesperson of every abrupt change the studio decided upon, as he was contractually bound to do. So the fans, helped along by many insinuations of Wolfe, Stentz and Miller who were roaming the fan boards, blamed it all on him.

reply

In short: Sorbo became the spokesperson of every abrupt change the studio decided upon, as he was contractually bound to do. So the fans, helped along by many insinuations of Wolfe, Stentz and Miller who were roaming the fan boards, blamed it all on him.
That makes the most sense with everything I've read on the subject. Thanks for the feedback!

Please stop.

reply

[deleted]

https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/7178z7/is_andromeda_any_good/dn8vtzw/

Early episodes are a little rough around the edges, but the first few seasons are overall quite enjoyable - great cast of characters and some cool worldbuilding and some genuinely thoughtful sci-fi. I've always really loved the concept of the Andromeda herself as a sentient A.I. that's both the ship and a robot avatar.
The other three seasons are a hodgepodge of a handful of really excellent episodes scattered among mostly forgettable fluff and an increasing emphasis on "Kevin Sorbo is the star of this show, damn it!" instead of the true ensemble that it was for the first two seasons.
I don't regret the time I spent with the first two seasons, but it's always going to be one that I regret not having gotten more of the good stuff. The characters and the worldbuilding deserved better.

reply