which ship would win


Andromeda ascendet
Enterprise A to E(Startrek) Or
ancient or earth vessels from stargate
just thinking wich won would win from who


old ford never die they just get faster

reply

Andromeda would win easily if they were ready for a fight(they've got missiles, fighters, crew, etc.) They could get in trouble if someone beamed aboard, but it's not like that's never happened before.

If they just ran into each other the Enterprise would totally massacre the Andromeda, since they have replicators to build everything they need out of nothing.

Earth vessels from Stargate wouldn't stand a chance since they haven't got infinite supplies like the Enterprise and can't match Andromeda's firepower or agility.

reply

Who said Enterprise, or anything in ST universe, has infinite supplies and make stuff out of nothing?

Still a dumb argument.

reply

Correction:

The Federation ships in Star Trek don't actually have infinite supplies, but they can make stuff from the raw atomic components, with the same tech they use for the transporters. There was a voyager episode(Year of Hell) where Chakotay gave Janeway a replica of an antique watch for her birthday, and she tells him to recycle it because they can't spare the material.

reply

In that same episode there was an interesting ship with the power to erase stuff from history. So one shot from that ship and any other mentioned in this thread would disapear not only from present but from the past too making it unexistence.

"I think there is a difference between a work of art and an Oscar." Roger Corman

reply

[deleted]

Sorry buddy, I have no idea about the Andromeda's mechanics because the series was never aired on this country... I was just being the usual nerd and could not resist the mention of one of my favorite Voyager episodes...

But now that you mention it I would like to know why the Timeship's weapon would have no effect on the Andromeda. Is that ship protected by some kind of temporal shield?

"I think there is a difference between a work of art and an Oscar." Roger Corman

reply

[deleted]

Well Voyager survived because Janeway avoided it until she could amase a small army of ships to attacked it. If the Voyager would have face that ship alone the story would have being different... literally different.

"I think there is a difference between a work of art and an Oscar." Roger Corman

reply

[deleted]

If andromeda can avoid the ship's ray then nothing will happen to it. Voyager only survived because the ship self destructed so the reverse time eraser made everything the ship destroyed come back to existence... Is a pretty convolted story but very fun to watch. There was also another very powerfull ship from the world of Star Trek, a ship from the 29th century that controls time aberrations. Also the Maximazed Voyager from the last episodes has an unpenetrable shield that made the ship practically undestructible.

I loved Voyager

Still have no clue on how Andromeda work since I didnt saw the series... I see you liked pretty much, is it good like the Trek series or more like Babylon 5?

"I think there is a difference between a work of art and an Oscar." Roger Corman

reply

[deleted]

Wow looking for information on the series I see is based on Roddenberry's work. That make it a must watch for me. I loved every single Roddenberry's series I have seen. Star Trek of course in every incarnation (Except Enterprise which was very disapointing for me) and Earth: Final Conflict were great.

"I think there is a difference between a work of art and an Oscar." Roger Corman

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

The Death Star will win against all of the ships togather.

reply

Except an x-wing class starfighter it would seem.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

Ok, a fully constructed Death Star 2 with operational sheilds.

reply

Lets go ahead and throw in the Covenant ships from Halo.

-------------------------------------


(-_-)

reply

A Battlestar would win. Not only cause they look the most realistic and have the best effects but also because the galactica has edward james olmos.
so suck it up you all loose^^
hehe

Into ur hands i commend my spirit

reply

[deleted]

Yet, Andromeda manages to be the most boring spaceship ever. Contrast it with:

Moya
Galactica
Serenity

Each of those is about a hundred times more interesting.

My biggest problem with Andromeda is that you ever, ever get a sense of how it is put together.

reply

can i add future voyager with the borg killer technology to this list?

reply

While we are at it lets add ''The Last Strafighter'' that ship took out an armada :))

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

Obviously the andromeda would fail completely. No sheilds = dead ship. All you need is to make a nanite gun, releases nanites that kill harpers nanites then begin to eat away at the hull. Also they replicate and are unkillable except by other nanites, as by the rules of nanites (and no "emp" bs). Of course, it would take years for nanites to do that type of dammage but still.

Replicators then, thats a great enemy for andromeda.

The problem with Shields, however, is that ships seem to suffer internal damage even WITH them on (and more than just the inertial shock).


Anchient, Ori, or even Anubis should be able to beat Andromeda... Sheilds will do that you know.

As for trek? Nope, they got nothing. Trek ships are big, slow (you'd think they'd invent "impulse warp" already. Jump into warp for .0001s and rejump over and over) and mostly only have forward attack cannons. There's a small poop chute on enterprise, but not much else... get above or below it and you can take the ship down regardless of firepower (remember, damaging the sheilds damages the ship). And since the ships are so DAMN SLOW, a manuverable ship like andromeda, there's nothing that the feds can do.

Let alone andromeda has fighters... what do you think a few shuttle pods are going to do? Seriously, Star Trek: TNG is awful. Enterprise is not a warship, it's not even close to one... the Defiant is an assault ship, but still not a warship.

And the defiant is still just a tiny little assault ship, and andromeda has TURRETS (Finally, LOGIC, big ships SHOULD have turrets, like the Flash Gordan turret barrage, not be frontal assault) No chance what so ever.

But take this into consideration, the commonwealth built how many of those ships? And HOW BADLY DID THEY GET BEAT? Thats right, they lost, andromeda lost... and a thousand year old ship is top of the line a thousand years later :p

reply

[deleted]

"Actually Andromeda (Season 1) takes place in 5161 AD... which is only 3161 years in the future."

You do realize that's 5161 "After Dillan"

reply

[deleted]

Vorlon Drednaught and Shadow Crab from Baylon 5 have a fair chance too, imho.

reply

[deleted]

From what i recall of Andromeda it's only real strength when compared to the other universe ships is one of range. Andromeda rarely seemed to engage other ships at anything like Star Trek or Stargate ranges, add to that the agility the ship had and it's going to be able to put up a fight for awhile.

As for the shield vs armor debate, of course shields are going to come out on top of just armor. It makes sense that the more levels of defense you have the longer you'll stay in a fight. But you shouldn't count out Andromeda for not having shields, it's hull after all could have been designed specifically to absorb certain levels of energy before failing. If that was above what a Trek ship could dish out with it's phasers, then yeah Andromedas hull would last for quite a long time.

Of course you then have Andromeda's weapons, which if i remember right it's main weapons were missles that relied only on it's kinetic energy to cause damage rather than having any type of warhead. I could be wrong though so put me straight on that. I'd say if you were to hit the shields of a Trek ship, and even a stargate ship, with enough of those missles your going to collapse them eventually and then begin to punch holes through the hull. Then again one photon torpedo could then destroy the Andromeda so it's end of the fight... Oh and nova bombs are usless in a straight up fight, that's been brought up in episodes before. They are able to cancel out gravity for a short time so it makes them perfect for firing into suns to cause them to go nova... Hence the name. Fire it at a ship and little if anything would really happen.

reply

[deleted]

B5 First One's ship has every chance. For example, Shadow Crab battleship posesed a unique ability to phase-shif/cloack and it's prime beam weapon could cut through any armor.

reply

[deleted]

OmegaPrimeJoe1 is crazy! Demanding proof about fictional ships on a fictional show!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

[deleted]

Thank you very much but please provide proof.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

[deleted]

Yes, that I'm a retard. Please provide proof of that.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

[deleted]

Wow! So there's a time limit on when you must stop posting on threads now is there? Thanks for clearing that up for this retard.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

[deleted]

Hey, no problems...I'm always happy to help people see what a big retard I am.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PsnxDQvQpw

reply

you're really bad at the internet

reply

The Battlestar Galactica.

reply

Everybody keeps mentioning about Nova Bombs with Andromeda. This is a mute point. Nova Bombs don't function like normal bombs. They don't actually blow stuff up. They destroy the bonds of gravity, thus destroying a star. The star then explodes, destroying everything near it.

As far as Trek syndrome goes, please point out specific incidents. I can recall no such incidents, when the Andromeda was getting her ass kicked that there wasn't a specific, plausible, reason that it was happening. In most cases, more advanced weaponry, such as PSP's.

As for which would win, I'd vote Andromeda or one of the Aura class Alteran vessels. Purely because their my favorite, nothing to do with tech or weapons or shields or anything like that.

reply

You misunderstand, the ppl in this thread want their favourite ship to win, therefore their favourite ship is better, and they will pull all sorts of convoluted "evidence" to support their ridiculous claims.

reply

neat thread.. i'm gonna see how many people i can piss off so i'll say that Sovereign (Mass Effect) is the strongest ship out there (but my personal favorite has to be the SR-2 Normandy (fully upgraded)). And the Normandy is also the most plausible(that seems to be an argument on this thread)

reply

The Defiant could easily crush Andromeda, as could any Enterprise or one of the Stargate Earth vessels with Ancient tech. As Andromeda has no shield, it has no way to stop them from beaming stuff aboard, like antimatter warheads.

In the case of the Defiant, it could decloak in transporter range and end the fight before it started.

reply

i think a ship with ancient shield/ ancient power source(zpm)/ best asgard hyper drives/and the fire power of the planet killer babylon 5 vorlon ship would be the winner... for me the beam weapon tech in the babylon5 series are the most powerful... especially those of vorlon and shadow vessels which have like billions of years of advancement(more so than stargate's ancients)

Look inside yourself and understand the universe

reply