Personally, I thought the remake was okay as its own thing. It was entertaining, albeit not what you would call "quality." I think the real problem in how it differed from the original is that it completely missed the point of the original. Making the humans able to talk totally took away from the reason they were being treated like animals by the apes in the original (they couldn't talk, they were very simple minded and less human, therefore it made sense for the apes to think of them as inferior). In the remake, the humans were...well, just normal humans, which made it kind of pointless and nonsensical. It was fun in its own way though, if you turn your brain off and just enjoy for what it is.
The differences to the original 1968 film do indeed make it its own thing. Otherwise if it was just a copycat of the 1968 film, I don't think Tim Burton would've had any interest in doing it. And that, to me, is what makes the 2001 film worthy of watching and worthy of being apart of this bigger 'Planet of the Apes' franchise - because it's still its own thing.
And whatever you think the point of the 1968 film is - it doesn't necessarily have to be copied in the 2001 film. In the context of the 2001 story, it only makes sense for the humans to talk since the humans are offspring of the space station crew.
The fact that the apes could overthrow the humans - obviously it's a movie and it takes its liberties - but it's mentioned in the film that the monkeys are genetically enhanced. And when frustrated, they can act out violently. In an isolated environment and outnumbered, I suppose it's feasible for the apes to overthrow the humans. Especially as the apes seem to evolve very quickly over the years and become smarter and are physically stronger and more capable.
reply
share